• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Most of The World Could Be 100% Powered With Renewables by 2050

yes, we know you need to be told what to believe. We are critical thinkers though and know better than to believe their steershit.
LOL

Would you go to a guy who ‘really knows the science’ for your colorectal cancer or an oncologist?
 
90 percent of cars sold in cold and rural Norway are fully electric.


While at the same time the cost of electric cars continue to drop.

All based on false expectations. And is the Norwegian government subsidizing EVs like the US is?
 
Don't know. I did not work there, my brother did. Couldn't be much worse then the humidity outside, here in the deep south.
I don't know about that, here in Houston the Summer humidity almost always starts at 100%,
but by 3 pm the warmer air holds more water and the humidity drops to about 60%.
Inside where the temp does not change much it might always be near 100%.
ether that or the AC are working overtime to pull out the extra humidity, still likely better than battery devices.
 
All based on false expectations. And is the Norwegian government subsidizing EVs like the US is?

Yes Norway are subsidizing electric because of the social and economical benefits.


While investment in electric cars have lead to economy of scale and innovation so electric cars are becoming more competitive.
 
yes, we know you need to be told what to believe. We are critical thinkers though and know better than to believe their steershit.

I have shows that even fossil fuel companies and
Not at all. I have repeatedly said that there are several variables involved, but you and others are the ones only wanting to focus on CO2 and CH4.

you are the deniers of science.

This is what science have to say about climate change.


 
Who cares what the top people say of an organization. They know if they do not play ball, their people will not get the grants.

follow the money.
Because the grants go to valid scientific concepts.

Folllow the science.
 
Who cares what the top people say of an organization. They know if they do not play ball, their people will not get the grants.

follow the money.

You have provided no sources for those accusations against the scientific community.

While western politicians have had a very close and profitable relationship with fossil fuel dictators and fossil fuel companies. There this is a big reason for that action on climate change have been delayed for so long.




 
You have provided no sources for those accusations against the scientific community.

While western politicians have had a very close and profitable relationship with fossil fuel dictators and fossil fuel companies. There this is a big reason for that action on climate change have been delayed for so long.




It's human nature and how bureaucracies work. Follow the money. Follow the promotions. Being a suck-up is how you get ahead in many ventures of life.

You only provide propaganda. You are such a good little sheeple.
 
It's human nature and how bureaucracies work. Follow the money. Follow the promotions. Being a suck-up is how you get ahead in many ventures of life.

You only provide propaganda. You are such a good little sheeple.
This level of rationalization is beyond delusional.
 
This level of rationalization is beyond delusional.
This is how human nature operates. Are you not human? Don't you see it? Individuals all doing what is best for themselves.
 
This is how human nature operates. Are you not human? Don't you see it? Individuals all doing what is best for themselves.
Yes, and what’s best is not to ruin their stellar scientific credentials by lying.

Those who have no scientific credentials have no credentials, experience or education are free to lie though, so have at it.
 
Yes, and what’s best is not to ruin their stellar scientific credentials by lying.

Those who have no scientific credentials have no credentials, experience or education are free to lie though, so have at it.
I understand. You're scared I am right because you lack the education to counter my arguments rationally. What I don't understand if why you and others keep making a fool of yourselves by displaying your ignorance for everyone to see. If you cannot show why I am wrong with science, a wise person would remain silent instead of displaying such arrogant ignorance.
 
I understand. You're scared I am right because you lack the education to counter my arguments rationally. What I don't understand if why you and others keep making a fool of yourselves by displaying your ignorance for everyone to see. If you cannot show why I am wrong with science, a wise person would remain silent instead of displaying such arrogant ignorance.
Wait… WE accept virtually every scientific organizations statement and you think WE are making fools of ourselves? 😂🤣😂
 
Wait… WE accept virtually every scientific organizations statement and you think WE are making fools of ourselves? 😂🤣😂
Absolutely.

You are accepting what bureaucracies say.
 
And virtually every scientific review in scientific journals.
That's not true. They use modelling with unreasonable assumed values to get such results, then the pundits claim it is what will happen, when it starts as a nearly impossible scenario.
I think we all see who’s making a fool of themself here…:
Looking in a mirror I see.

I understand this stuff. You cave no credibility because you cannot exoplanet the simplest of it. I understand it and can explain how this science works.

You are just a useful pundit for the agenda. Explaining things you believe instead of can understand. Just like the media and journalists do.
 
That's not true. They use modelling with unreasonable assumed values to get such results, then the pundits claim it is what will happen, when it starts as a nearly impossible scenario.

Looking in a mirror I see.

I understand this stuff. You cave no credibility because you cannot exoplanet the simplest of it. I understand it and can explain how this science works.

You are just a useful pundit for the agenda. Explaining things you believe instead of can understand. Just like the media and journalists do.
It’s not true?

Show me a review on climate that doesn’t say it’s warming from GHG.

Oh right. You don’t read the science, you just pretend you do.

I can produce dozens. Can you find any?


 
It’s not true?

Show me a review on climate that doesn’t say it’s warming from GHG.
Your binary thinking shows how uneducated you are.

Not agreeing with how much warming they claim CO2 causes is does not bean I think it causes no warming.

Your binary thinking is a very clear indication of you lack to understand even the simplest parts of AGW.
Oh right. You don’t read the science, you just pretend you do.
I read it. I haven't filed this one away yet

1714242439344.webp

I can produce dozens. Can you find any?


I see you are too lazy to quote any of the body of it. Did you realize too late that these are just talking about other papers, and have no real research themselves?

1714243051073.webp

Do you really think you fool anyone smarter than you?
 
Your binary thinking shows how uneducated you are.

Not agreeing with how much warming they claim CO2 causes is does not bean I think it causes no warming.

Your binary thinking is a very clear indication of you lack to understand even the simplest parts of AGW.

I read it. I haven't filed this one away yet

View attachment 67506799


I see you are too lazy to quote any of the body of it. Did you realize too late that these are just talking about other papers, and have no real research themselves?

View attachment 67506801

Do you really think you fool anyone smarter than you?
LOL.

You don’t know what a review paper is!
God, that is such a self-own, and you’ll never realize it.

@Buzz- come check this out! It’s one for the ages! LOL

You also neglected to cite anything. Don’t you always wonder why they have little numbers in superscript in those papers after every fact?

And why a third of the paper is a bunch of authors, titles and numbers in a numbered list at the end?

🤣
 
Back
Top Bottom