- Joined
- Jul 31, 2014
- Messages
- 4,230
- Reaction score
- 1,605
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
If we're both paying, why would you be able to say I can't use them?Yep, and I pay more than you for these roads, then should I say that you shouldn't be able to travel them?
If we're both paying, why would you be able to say I can't use them?
I don't think we're arguing the same point anymore.Your point if I have it right is the old progressive saw, "I didn't build that"...So, if you want to say that my usage should be based on taxation paid, as a truck driver, I pay far more than you do for them...So, I should get more say right?
I don't think we're arguing the same point anymore.
Yep, and I pay more than you for these roads, then should I say that you shouldn't be able to travel them?
You may pay more than one individual car owner but you do far more damage to that piece of asphalt than he does too. One 18 wheeler does as much damage to the roads as 9600 cars.
That sounds like you're looking for a private interstate system that you can build entirely on your own finances.Well, simple...Take all the cars off my interstate.
That sounds like you're looking for a private interstate system that you can build entirely on your own finances.
Let me know how that goes.
So we'll need checkpoints at every offramp to ensure that drivers are:I have one, it's called the interstate system...Maybe you should look into why exactly it was built in the first place...That would be for interstate commerce...That is what I do....
Geeezz.. more of this nonsense
Us vs them, rich vs poor, 1 percent vs the 99 percent.
Its all bull ****.
Purposely divisive leftist perpetuatjions to push an agenda built on envy, and the false narrative of " disparity ".
All because they have absolutely nothing substantial to run on. Their policies can't stand on their own merits so they invent these class struggles.
Trying to rope in the useful idiots who actually think Government should be the final arbiter of whats " fair " and " equitable ".
So we'll need checkpoints at every offramp to ensure that drivers are:
A) traveling between states
B) engaging in commerce while traveling to another state
Ask your teacher tomorrow after homeroom...I don't have the patience to deal with your level of remedial need.
You're claiming that you're the king of the freeways and no one else should be allowed in your castle.
You're also claiming I have a juvenile understanding of the issue.
I see this as mildly ironic.
Private business didn't create the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.
Private business didn't create the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.
I scrolled through the first five paragraphs of hunter gatherers engaging in free commerce without interference by a socialist state. If your source had something relevant to the conversation I'd assume it'd be easily found in the article you'd link otherwise you'd cut and paste the specific parts that support your argument.You didn't even read the article did you?....:roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?