• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Most American Wealth is Inherited

veritas1 said:
Running from your previous specious claims won't save you. Maybe bring in the first string. You're too easy.
Click to expand...

Claiming I'm running from anything is yet another lie. Thanks again.
 
veritas1 said:
You could even, you know, like find it and read it.:lol:
Click to expand...

I searched for it and couldn't find it. So, I'm sure you'll want to link directly to it. That couldn't be a lie, too, could it? I mean it would really be foolish to lie about something like that in the middle of a compilation of all your lying, right? Or, could it have been this one: Former British leader defends Biden Ukraine scenario - POLITICO or this one: Ukraine reviews case into company that employed Biden's son - POLITICO which contains this sentence:
Though the timing raised concerns among anti-corruption advocates, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either the former vice president or his son.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Condor060 said:
Communism at its finest. No billionaire or multi millionaire is going to leave 90% of their money to the US government. They would simply leave the US. In droves.

Family owned businesses that have been in the US for decades would sell off their assets and take their money off shore. No farmer would devastate his family simply by dying.

This is nothing but the thought process of the jealous entitled Liberal who has no clue about financial infrastructure. Totally clueless as to ramifications of such only to try and get someone else's money because they think they can't make any money because billionaires horde it all.

So when Dave Thomas died (Owner of Wendys) the entire chain of stores would be sold off so they could pay 99% of that money to the government? Thats the most idiotic thing posted on these boards.
Click to expand...

Wendy's is a publicly traded company. So upon his death, they would have had to either pay the tax rate or sell of a share of his stocks in the business to pay the taxes. But the franchises either way would still be owned by the publicly traded company.
 
veritas1 said:
Running from your previous specious claims won't save you. Maybe bring in the first string. You're too easy.
Click to expand...
"verita1"? Yoo-hoooooooo. Wherefore art thou? It was just starting to get fun and then you're gone--right after accusing me of running away, too. Bad timing, eh? I'm sure you're out there searching for that Politico article because you definitely would want me to see that, right?
 
snakestretcher said:
So you don't want the 1% paying their share. Interesting. Oh, and it's 'you're' not 'your'. Isn't US education great!
Click to expand...

They pay their share and that of roughly 3k other Americans

And you are absolutely right about the education system, we should definitely trust the government that created that program to handle all our wealth, earned or not
 
digitusmedius said:
So, you're just passing along lies which is lying by proxy. You're sort of destroying yourself here, ver, and that makes me feel I'm taking unfair advantage of a defenseless opponent.
BTW, I'd love to read that article. Care to link to it?
Click to expand...

I'm not going to link it. If you're that interested you can go find it. If you think it's inaccurate you can take it up with Politico.
 
digitusmedius said:
I searched for it and couldn't find it. So, I'm sure you'll want to link directly to it. That couldn't be a lie, too, could it? I mean it would really be foolish to lie about something like that in the middle of a compilation of all your lying, right? Or, could it have been this one: Former British leader defends Biden Ukraine scenario - POLITICO or this one: Ukraine reviews case into company that employed Biden's son - POLITICO which contains this sentence:
Click to expand...

Here you go. I wouldn't want you to have another meltdown so I found this in like 4 seconds.:lol:

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
 
calamity said:
They can redistribute it for things we need: education, infrastructure, healthcare, etc.

Why would you oppose good things so that billionaires can hoard their cash? I do not understand poor people defending billionaires. Correct.
Click to expand...

Billionaires are NOT hoarding cash.
 
digitusmedius said:
I can see why you didn't want to link to it. You lied that it had something to do with democrats conspiring with Ukrainians when it's really about the criminal activity of Manafort.
Click to expand...

:lamo

I see you didn't even read it.


Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country. Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


Utterly hilarious. Dismissed.
 
veritas1 said:
:lamo

I see you didn't even read it.


Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country. Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


Utterly hilarious. Dismissed.
Click to expand...

During the campaign your Dear ****bag said he wasn't sure he'd support Ukraine if he were to be president (that was mentioned by one of the witnesses today, btw). That, was Putin, the puppetmaster, talking of course and of course that outraged the brave Ukrainians who were fighting the Russians and among whom 11,000 of their soldiers had already died. They had every right to openly express their anger toward your Dear ****bag and express a wish for Clinton to win. That is entirely legal. What they did not do is give any "thing of value" in any form to the Clinton campaign. Congratulations on yet another one of your lies and spectacular fails.
 
digitusmedius said:
During the campaign your Dear ****bag said he wasn't sure he'd support Ukraine if he were to be president (that was mentioned by one of the witnesses today, btw). That, was Putin, the puppetmaster, talking of course and of course that outraged the brave Ukrainians who were fighting the Russians and among whom 11,000 of their soldiers had already died. They had every right to openly express their anger toward your Dear ****bag and express a wish for Clinton to win. That is entirely legal. What they did not do is give any "thing of value" in any form to the Clinton campaign. Congratulations on yet another one of your lies and spectacular fails.
Click to expand...

You're so utterly full of crap, it's amazing. The Dems were colluding with Ukraine as the article clearly spells out. Whether that collusion was ultimately successful is totally irrelevant. They also colluded with Russians to construct the phony dossier. These are FACTS to which you are allergic as you are to anything which exposes Democrat hypocrisy and misdeeds. You're an ideological drone gladly swallowing the swill your MSM masters ladle down your throat. No wonder you guys are going to get the crap kicked out of you. If those two guys presented today are the best that Comrade Schiff and his apparatchiks can come up with, then this thing is even deader than we imagined. Sorry, the Soviet style show trial is going to fail. Better luck next time.:lol:
 
veritas1 said:
You're so utterly full of crap, it's amazing. The Dems were colluding with Ukraine as the article clearly spells out. Whether that collusion was ultimately successful is totally irrelevant. They also colluded with Russians to construct the phony dossier. These are FACTS to which you are allergic as you are to anything which exposes Democrat hypocrisy and misdeeds. You're an ideological drone gladly swallowing the swill your MSM masters ladle down your throat. No wonder you guys are going to get the crap kicked out of you. If those two guys presented today are the best that Comrade Schiff and his apparatchiks can come up with, then this thing is even deader than we imagined. Sorry, the Soviet style show trial is going to fail. Better luck next time.:lol:
Click to expand...

Wow, a whole paragraph of lies there. You're in high gear cleaning your Dear ****bag's toilet now.
 
calamity said:
Actually, the stats suggest the opposite: most rich people today did not earn it. They were born into it. So, by extrapolation, poverty is a generational thing.
Click to expand...

The solution would then be for those who cannot afford to support themselves to cease having children until which time they can afford to provide for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom