• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

More than a dozen Medal of Honor recipients endorse former president (1 Viewer)

"Con-victions are meaningless to most people who are right leaning"...not the flex you think it is...:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
It was too partisan. Nothing fair. It was orgasmic for the left.
 
There are not typical military members. They are congressional Medal of Honor recipients. the best of the best.
You mean the ones he denigrated because the Medal of Freedom is better? What is the average age of these demented individuals?
 
His word against all the other aides who said they didn't hear that Trump comment.
Factcheck.org, Snopes.com
And what aids spoke up claiming he didn't say it? Name names.
 
Shall I remind you of that silly logic next time you quote a poll giving a democrap candidate or congress critter a slight lead. After all 700 to 1200 do not speak for the entire nation, right?
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
25 witnesses that were at the event where it's claimed he said it deny it. Debunked.
So you think Kelly made that up? That is virtually impossible. No one would even think such an abomination. It does sound like someone who said "he likes heroes that don't get captured" might say though. He cannot even imagine what selflessness is.
 
No, but they are useful tools when they choose to politicize the honor the nation has bestowed upon them.
That poster lied about Milley being fired by the rapey felon...he wasn't.
 
You mean the ones he denigrated because the Medal of Freedom is better? What is the average age of these demented individuals?

Uhhh...you just referred to MOH recipients as "demented individuals" while crying that Trump denigrates MOH recipients?

That might be one of the funnier things I'll read all week.
 
In the long run it's not just about Trump. What he was charged and convicted on was an alleged misdemaor over a non disclosure agreement in the lead up to the 2016 election. Bragg on his own upped it to a felony. If it were anyone else. prosecutors would have wasted no time on it. Bragg himself initially refused to prosecute it. If Trump had not planned to run for president in 2024, the case would never have been prosecuted. It waas politically driven lawfare set up in hiopes that it would tank his 2024 campaign. The point is that if the political establishment can do that to Trump, they can do it to anybody. It's opened up a Pandora's box that both parties will come to regret.
It wasn’t politically driven.
Trump committed felonies in NY.
He was tried and convicted.
He’s a felon. And a sexual abuser. And stole charity money from kids with cancer.

He’s the guy 40% of the country think is awesome and they wish they were just like him.
 
Trump cannot possibly screw over the military more than the left has already done. The left has kicked senior officers and senior NCOs out of the military, for refusing to go along with the gay agenda, DEI, trans agenda, and so much more. Our military has been emasculated by the crazy left. The Air Force and the Coast Guard have both stated clearly that they will continue replacing straight Christian white males with anything they can get their hands on. A Hezbollah terrorist has a better chance of getting into the Air Force academy than my son.
When did you serve?
 
Uhhh...you just referred to MOH recipients as "demented individuals" while crying that Trump denigrates MOH recipients?

That might be one of the funnier things I'll read all week.
Sorry but anyone that supports Trump must be demented. He is unfit to be President. He is a threat to our democracy like none other in history just like many in the military who worked with him said. You would think losing our democracy is amusing. You hate America and want a dictatorship under Trump.
 
All the MAGAs we post with here have families/friends/towns.

Their families/etc know that they support a rapist, traitor and guy who thinks soldiers are suckers.

I think many people in their families/etc have disowned them. They're probably lonely now.
 
25% of 60 living recipients not only endorsing Trump but putting it in the form of a signed letter is big. It was more then just a case of saying: "I will vote for Trump".
Oooooooo! A signed letter!!!!
 
What really get to libruls like you is that we do not consider Trump a convicted felon. It was a case of partisan lawfare, in effect election interference, over an alleged misdemeanor in the lead up to the 2016 election. I fully expect the convictions will be overturned either in the Appeals Court or the SCOTUS. And deep down, you probably believe the same.
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

"Lawfare" really means support of criminal activity.
 
The jury was partisan? Where is the proof of that?
I am saying the state jury pool in general was biased with the chronic news for all the time before they were selcted. Hard to say about the selected jury, but it is difficult to believe they ended up being unbiased.
 
"Milley's remark was reported by The Independent and other media outlets after it was included in legendary journalist Bob Woodward's new book, War.

"He is the most dangerous person ever. I had suspicions when I talked to you about his mental decline and so forth, but now I realize he's a total fascist. He is now the most dangerous person to this country," Milley, who was nominated by Trump to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 2018 and served in the role from 2019 to 2023, reportedly told Woodward."
 
I am saying the state jury pool in general was biased with the chronic news for all the time before they were selcted. Hard to say about the selected jury, but it is difficult to believe they ended up being unbiased.
Right you want military tribunals instead right? You want to end the rule of law and all our freedoms with it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom