- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Messages
- 22,418
- Reaction score
- 9,918
- Location
- Alaska (61.5°N, -149°W)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
It is not really a good comparison unless you take population density into consideration. States like Montana and South Dakota, with very low population densities when compared to the other States are going to have a much more significant change in their statistics.Daddy0 wrote: "In reality only areas with high numbers of leftists and guns seem to be the problem."
- then I supplied a list of states with high homicide rates - states, except for Delaware and Maryland, which are controlled by the GOP
For some reason, certain persons responding to my post are apparently unable or incapable of seeing the problem with DaddyO's words.
Are you claiming that there are "areas with high numbers of leftists and guns" in the GOP-controlled states?
Gun ownership in the states named in the earlier post
Mississippi -- 55.8% of adults have guns at home.
Louisiana -- 53.1%
Alabama -- 55.5%
Missouri -- 48.8%
Arkansas -- 57.2%
South Carolina -- 49.4%
Tennessee -- 51.6%
Maryland -- 30.2%
Homicide increase rate in parenthesis followed by gun ownership rate
Montana (+83.8) -- 66.3%
South Dakota (+80.6) -- 55.5%
Delaware (+62.3) -- 34.4%
Kentucky (+61.0) -- 54.6%
For example, Alaska had a murder ratio per 100,000 of 5.7 in 2021, and a murder ratio per 100,000 of 9.6 in 2022. That is because the number of murders in Alaska went from 42 in 2021 to 70 by 2022. The smaller the population a State has the bigger the fluctuation from year to year.
Therefore, it is fair to say that neither Montana nor South Dakota will have the same murder ratio next year. It could get worse, or it could get better, but it will certainly change by a significant amount. Whereas that will not be the case in Delaware or Kentucky with their much larger population density.