• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More child grooming

Simpletruther

DP Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
19,310
Reaction score
3,652
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed

Simulated sex in front of kids at a theme park.

Pretty disgusting.

But, if parents who were there object, shut your stupid mouths and suckit up.

You get in bed with these people you will get dirty. You should know that by now. Unless this was some secret till the last minute, you have no excuses for being there if you don't like it.
 
isnt there way higher instances of child rape within the homosexual community?
 
This is why these culture wars go off the rails, you get these events where some idiot takes things too far doing something in front of kids most realize is over the line and you end up with a backlash where everyone politically has to side with the performer or the audience.

We should not be here. If we are using drag queens to make a point by having kids see all this then you are by default admitting child grooming.
 
The baptists press has an obvious religious bias. Try something with facts.

In recent days, Family Research Council (FRC) president Tony Perkins has used the emerging scandal surrounding former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) to promote a falsehood about gay men -- that they are more likely than straight men to sexually abuse children, based on the claim that homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex abuse cases. In fact, a 1995 study released by the American Psychological Association found that “gay men are no more likely than heterosexual men to perpetrate child sexual abuse”; the argument that homosexuals are overrepresented in such cases is based on what John Hopkins University psychiatrist Frederick Berlin has described as the “flawed assumption” that men who abuse young boys are also attracted to grown men.


On October 2, Perkins issued a statement on what he claimed was “the real issue” in the Foley scandal -- the purported “link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse”; the statement was uncritically reported by the San Francisco Chronicle in an October 3 report on the scandal. Similarly, on the October 3 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews failed to challenge the claim by Perkins that “there's clear research that shows that homosexual men are more likely to abuse children than straight men.” Perkins's claim appears to be based on an article on the Family Research Council's website by Timothy J. Dailey, a senior research fellow at the FRC's Center for Marriage and Family Studies, which asserts that there is a “disturbing connection” between homosexuality and pedophilia because “homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses” whereas homosexuals make up only “1 to 3 percent of the population.”
 
The baptists press has an obvious religious bias. Try something with facts.



every study has a bias lol

if you believe otherwise I got some beach front property in nevada to sell ya
 
every study has a bias lol

So cite another source with the opposite bias.

You may be willing to be deceived, in support of your own radical beliefs, why should anyone else play that game? We have no wish to spend time reading, only to be worse informed than we were before.
 
Couldn't help but to notice the adults in the audience who appear to be applauding and cheering? Ugh
 
I guess the Baptist Press isn't going to discuss the disturbingly high incidence of child molestation by church ministers that we see in the news every week??
 
I guess the Baptist Press isn't going to discuss the disturbingly high incidence of child molestation by church ministers that we see in the news every week??
More than 700 cases were known to a secret document uncovered at the Southern Baptist Church.

In response to an explosive investigation, top Southern Baptists have released a previously secret list of hundreds of pastors and other church-affiliated personnel accused of sexual abuse.


The 205-page database was made public late Thursday. It includes more than 700 entries from cases that largely span from 2000 to 2019.


Its existence became widely known Sunday when the independent firm, Guidepost Solutions, included it in its bombshell report detailing how the Southern Baptist Convention's Executive Committee mishandled allegations of sex abuse, stonewalled numerous survivors and prioritized protecting the SBC from liability.


Executive Committee leaders Rolland Slade and Willie McLaurin, in a joint statement, called publishing the list "an initial, but important, step towards addressing the scourge of sexual abuse and implementing reform in the Convention."


Top Southern Baptists stonewalled and denigrated sex abuse victims, report says

Religion


Top Southern Baptists stonewalled and denigrated sex abuse victims, report says


"Each entry in this list reminds us of the devastation and destruction brought about by sexual abuse," they said. "Our prayer is that the survivors of these heinous acts find hope and healing, and that churches will utilize this list proactively to protect and care for the most vulnerable among us."


Church officials kept a private list of abusers, an investigation found​


The Guidepost report, released after a seven-month investigation, contained several explosive revelations. Among them: D. August Boto, the committee's former vice president and general counsel, and former SBC spokesman Roger Oldham kept their own private list of abusive ministers. Both retired in 2019. The existence of the list was not widely known within the committee and its staff.
 
The baptists press has an obvious religious bias. Try something with facts.



Your “study” seems to be using a rather odd definition of homosexual if a sex act between two males (regardless of their ages) is not considered to be (clear evidence of) homosexuality. Stating that an adult male didn’t commit a homosexual act by having sex with a male minor if that adult male also had sex with adult women isn’t a scientific fact, it’s simply an opinion.
 
Your “study” seems to be using a rather odd definition of homosexual if a sex act between two males (regardless of their ages) is not considered to be (clear evidence of) homosexuality. Stating that an adult male didn’t commit a homosexual act by having sex with a male minor if that adult male also had sex with adult women isn’t a scientific fact, it’s simply an opinion.
The fact that some people choose to abuse children doesn't tell you anything about their sexual orientation. If a man sexually abuses a male child, that doesn't mean that he is homosexual. It means that he is a child abuser.
 
Your “study” seems to be using a rather odd definition of homosexual if a sex act between two males (regardless of their ages) is not considered to be (clear evidence of) homosexuality. Stating that an adult male didn’t commit a homosexual act by having sex with a male minor if that adult male also had sex with adult women isn’t a scientific fact, it’s simply an opinion.
Did you read this?

However, in a July 2002 report, USA Today noted numerous experts in psychotherapy, psychiatry, and child sex abuse who argued that figures showing “male pedophiles are more likely to molest boys than girls” are not evidence that gay men are more likely to abuse children than straight men, because they conflate men who abuse boys with gay men.
 
The fact that some people choose to abuse children doesn't tell you anything about their sexual orientation. If a man sexually abuses a male child, that doesn't mean that he is homosexual. It means that he is a child abuser.

stretch post of the day lol
 

Simulated sex in front of kids at a theme park.

Pretty disgusting.

But, if parents who were there object, shut your stupid mouths and suckit up.

You get in bed with these people you will get dirty. You should know that by now. Unless this was some secret till the last minute, you have no excuses for being there if you don't like it.
Doesn't seem to be very age appropriate nor venue appropriate. Poor judgement on both of these decisions.
 
This is why these culture wars go off the rails, you get these events where some idiot takes things too far doing something in front of kids most realize is over the line and you end up with a backlash where everyone politically has to side with the performer or the audience.

We should not be here. If we are using drag queens to make a point by having kids see all this then you are by default admitting child grooming.
Of course. But they will double down. It's "healthy" for kids to have knowledge blah blah blah.
 

Simulated sex in front of kids at a theme park.

Pretty disgusting.

But, if parents who were there object, shut your stupid mouths and suckit up.

You get in bed with these people you will get dirty. You should know that by now. Unless this was some secret till the last minute, you have no excuses for being there if you don't like it.
I start threads all of the time about adult men who groom and then rape and or sodomize little kids. How come you never participate? These are actual rapes.

And tons of these adult men are from the church. How come you have no opinion on that?
 
The fact that some people choose to abuse children doesn't tell you anything about their sexual orientation. If a man sexually abuses a male child, that doesn't mean that he is homosexual. It means that he is a child abuser.

Nonsense. How can a person engaging in a sexual act with someone of the same sex (regardless of age) not be considered homosexuality (aka exhibiting homosexual behavior)?
 
Back
Top Bottom