• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More bad Epstein news for Prince Andrew

joluoto

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 8, 2020
Messages
16,639
Reaction score
11,702
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive

Giuffre accuses 'entitled' Andrew in posthumous book


Giuffre's posthumous book is out. Prince Andrew is named to have had sex with her three times in totally innocent Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London, while she was a minor (trafficking of a minor right there). But no, Epstein didn't have any client, no sir, none at all, he was trafficking young girls and women to no one.

Well, more embarrasment for the already disgraced Prince. But he must be protected at all cost by the Crown apparently, and absolutely will not ever be charged with any crimes.
 
Well, more embarrasment for the already disgraced Prince. But he must be protected at all cost by the Crown apparently, and absolutely will not ever be charged with any crimes.

Isn't it "funny" how Prince Harry was castigated by the public and the mainstream "popular" newspapers like the Express, Mail and Sun for marrying a brown American woman and walking away from the Royalty while Andrew has apparently slept with underage girls and isn't facing anything like the same public vilification.

Sad world we live in where who you marry has more potential for outrage and British hatred than the age of the people you have sex with.
 

Giuffre accuses 'entitled' Andrew in posthumous book


Giuffre's posthumous book is out. Prince Andrew is named to have had sex with her three times in totally innocent Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London, while she was a minor (trafficking of a minor right there). But no, Epstein didn't have any client, no sir, none at all, he was trafficking young girls and women to no one.

Well, more embarrasment for the already disgraced Prince. But he must be protected at all cost by the Crown apparently, and absolutely will not ever be charged with any crimes.
He isnt someone who you would have a pint with. But what would you charfe him with ? I cant see where he has broken a british law. The age of consent is 16 in the UK.
 
Isn't it "funny" how Prince Harry was castigated by the public and the mainstream "popular" newspapers like the Express, Mail and Sun for marrying a brown American woman and walking away from the Royalty while Andrew has apparently slept with underage girls and isn't facing anything like the same public vilification.

Sad world we live in where who you marry has more potential for outrage and British hatred than the age of the people you have sex with.
I imagine its all about the image of the monarchy and producing heirs. I’d hate to be part of royalty
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bum
I imagine its all about the image of the monarchy and producing heirs.

That was Dianna's job as a brood mare. "Andrew" produced two kids with Sarah Ferguson so he has no excuse.

I’d hate to be part of royalty

I'd hate to be Andrew and Sarah Ferguson's kids - both parents heavily involved with Epstein. 🤮
 
Trafficking.

Anyhow, "Andrew" as he is now has just given up his royal titles.


Shouldn't allow him to get away with what he was up to.

He's given up his royal titles because the King told him he is giving up his royal titles.

It could get worse as William has always hated his guts. When he becomes monarch Andrew will be lucky to get a job cleaning up the horseshit at Windsor Great Park.

1000050337.webp

This is not enough. It's time for the UK Police to work with the FBI to investigate the allegations and if warranted charge him.
 
He's given up his royal titles because the King told him he is giving up his royal titles.

It could get worse as William has always hated his guts. When he becomes monarch Andrew will be lucky to get a job cleaning up the horseshit at Windsor Great Park.

View attachment 67593580

This is not enough. It's time for the UK Police to work with the FBI to investigate the allegations and if warranted charge him.
Andrew is frozen out and humiliated.

Quite the contrast with the royal treatment given to trump by his subservient politicos and his devoted MAGA cult.
 
Andrew is frozen out and humiliated.

Quite the contrast with the royal treatment given to trump by his subservient politicos and his devoted MAGA cult.
Trump is oing well out of the paedo game.
 
That was Dianna's job as a brood mare. "Andrew" produced two kids with Sarah Ferguson so he has no excuse.



I'd hate to be Andrew and Sarah Ferguson's kids - both parents heavily involved with Epstein. 🤮
I dont think hes broken the law.
 
This is not enough. It's time for the UK Police to work with the FBI to investigate the allegations and if warranted charge him.

If Giuffre was trafficked to the UK for sex, then yes. Otherwise, he should face American legal action.

I dont think hes broken the law.

He will have done in the US as she was under 18 at the time. Why do you think he's never been back to the US since the accusations despite being a huge golfing fanatic who used to take any trip he could involving golf (and now apparently - underage women)
 
"The New York Times" has been covering the way that the recent Epstein revelations have affected Prince Andrew. Here is one of the less exhaustive articles about him.
 
I dont think hes broken the law.
We know Epstein abused hundreds, maybe thousands of girls.

For that reason his victims are credible with regard to their accusations against him and his associates including Prince Andrew.
 
We know Epstein abused hundreds, maybe thousands of girls.

For that reason his victims are credible with regard to their accusations against him and his associates including Prince Andrew.
But as far as I understand that girl was 17 when he was fuxking her in Belgravis. That breaks no laws in the UK. Its a bit icky but not illegal. Even if he paid for her flight and hotel I cant see what laws he broke. And its unlikely the scumbag paid for anuthing.
The FBI are not interested and the current rehime certainly arent. Trump wont poke that nest
Starmer wont pursue this as it would harm his relationship with trump.
And there is an and to it. Money talks even in the grave.
 
We know Epstein abused hundreds, maybe thousands of girls.

For that reason his victims are credible with regard to their accusations against him and his associates including Prince Andrew.
So damning were Andrew's communications with Epstein--all that "We'll have fun" stuff. I hope that Prince Harry has the heads-up now that his dukedom too can be held in abeyance. I will give credit to Andrew for just one thing: Unlike his equally stupid, entitled, and arrogant nephew, he has never betrayed his family. He too could make millions with a tell-all, but he won't. I think he agreed to this to protect his daughters' HRHs and so King Charles will get off his ass about the Royal Lodge in exchange for his future and permanent quiet invisibility.
 
But as far as I understand that girl was 17 when he was fuxking her in Belgravis. That breaks no laws in the UK. Its a bit icky but not illegal. Even if he paid for her flight and hotel I cant see what laws he broke. And its unlikely the scumbag paid for anuthing.
The FBI are not interested and the current rehime certainly arent. Trump wont poke that nest
Starmer wont pursue this as it would harm his relationship with trump.
And there is an and to it. Money talks even in the grave.
Who was the scumbag?
 
So damning were Andrew's communications with Epstein--all that "We'll have fun" stuff. I hope that Prince Harry has the heads-up now that his dukedom too can be held in abeyance. I will give credit to Andrew for just one thing: Unlike his equally stupid, entitled, and arrogant nephew, he has never betrayed his family. He too could make millions with a tell-all, but he won't. I think he agreed to this to protect his daughters' HRHs and so King Charles will get off his ass about the Royal Lodge in exchange for his future and permanent quiet invisibility.
We need rid of all of them.
 
I will give credit to Andrew for just one thing: Unlike his equally stupid, entitled, and arrogant nephew, he has never betrayed his family.

Hmmmm... when Harry is caught up in a case around a mass abuser of underage women and abusing his power and influence I might agree with you but I recall you and I have had very different opinions about Harry and his desire to walk away from the life of an entitled Royal.
 
Hmmmm... when Harry is caught up in a case around a mass abuser of underage women and abusing his power and influence I might agree with you but I recall you and I have had very different opinions about Harry and his desire to walk away from the life of an entitled Royal.
He wants all the perks with none of the responsibilities, though; hence, he continues to bleat about his IPP status and squander his money while David Sherborne (and others) continue laughing all the way to the bank.

I believe that the Palace did an extraordinary PR job in protecting Harry for many years--creating the war hero myth and covering up who-knows-what. Rumors abound at ARRSE. I won't repeat them, but I expect some of them to be confirmed.

Of course, given his drug-addled state, which he freely discusses in Spare, perhaps he will write a sequel or two of his grotesquely "curated"* memories. The world already knows that he put his mum's face cream on his todger and thought of her. What more does the world need to know?
*Prince Harry: "Whatever the cause, my memory is my memory, it does what it does, gathers and curates as it sees fit, and there's just as much truth in what I remember and how I remember it as there is in so-called objective facts."
 

Giuffre accuses 'entitled' Andrew in posthumous book


Giuffre's posthumous book is out. Prince Andrew is named to have had sex with her three times in totally innocent Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London, while she was a minor (trafficking of a minor right there). But no, Epstein didn't have any client, no sir, none at all, he was trafficking young girls and women to no one.

Well, more embarrasment for the already disgraced Prince. But he must be protected at all cost by the Crown apparently, and absolutely will not ever be charged with any crimes.
Apparently, there is much more to come. Check the Daily Mail's headlines--more from the memoir and an exclusive on a second woman who was trafficked.
 
Rumors abound at ARRSE.

I've been a non-posting member of ARRSE for years and you'll see everything from Enoch Powell hero worship right through to a very rare few socialist leaning posters.
There are also a great many ex services who worked with Harry who say different about the rumours you've read.

Anyhow, this thread's about Andrew who I feel has actually done things far more detrimental to the image of the Royal Family than any of the other family bar Edward VIII and his nazi tendencies.
 
I've been a non-posting member of ARRSE for years and you'll see everything from Enoch Powell hero worship right through to a very rare few socialist leaning posters.
There are also a great many ex services who worked with Harry who say different about the rumours you've read.

Anyhow, this thread's about Andrew who I feel has actually done things far more detrimental to the image of the Royal Family than any of the other family bar Edward VIII and his nazi tendencies.
Yes, I'm familiar with how diverse ARRSE is; I know two vets, both women, who post there.

Sadly, and I do admire the late QEII, Andrew was her weak spot, and she left a mess for King Charles to clean up. More scandalous information is now emerging, and there are calls for Andrew to exiled abroad. This is so...sordid.

But it's also a distraction, isn't it, from the prospect of Nigel Farage as the new PM?
 
"We have to remember at the heart of all this is not really the royal family at all - it's
the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and Virginia Giuffre being one of them."

Well said Jenny Bond.

It seems the London Police force is looking into whether Andrew used his position to try and dig up some dirt about Giuffre when he was first accused.
 
But as far as I understand that girl was 17 when he was fuxking her in Belgravis. That breaks no laws in the UK. Its a bit icky but not illegal. Even if he paid for her flight and hotel I cant see what laws he broke. And its unlikely the scumbag paid for anuthing.
The FBI are not interested and the current rehime certainly arent. Trump wont poke that nest
Starmer wont pursue this as it would harm his relationship with trump.
And there is an and to it. Money talks even in the grave.
What is the legal age of consent in Britain??
 
Back
Top Bottom