Microsoft will give away software to guard U.S. voting machines

[haymarket]

I've read it. Can you cite specific part to which you are referring? How Russian interfered?

asked and answered

 

[haymarket]

It is it my responsibility to report My financial information. You made a claim that I wasn't paying for the services of the government provided base. Prove it?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

I never made that claim and when challenged, you were impotent to produce such a claim.

Yes - when you make a claim and it is challenged, it is your responsibility to back it up with proof.

 

[Beowulf]

asked and answered

But the part you cited doesn't say anything about how Russian interfered.

 

[Beowulf]

It is it my responsibility to report My financial information. You made a claim that I wasn't paying for the services of the government provided base. Prove it?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

I believe the appropriate response is: "Asked and answered."

 

[haymarket]

But the part you cited doesn't say anything about how Russian interfered.

The Mueller Report has over 150 pages about Russian interference in the election. But you want to wallow in willful ignorance and not read it while you pretend you can discuss the subject at the same time.

 

[Beowulf]

The Mueller Report has over 150 pages about Russian interference in the election. But you want to wallow in willful ignorance and not read it while you pretend you can discuss the subject at the same time.

I just told you that I read it.

The part you cited doesn't say anything about how Russian interfered.

 

[Conservative]

I never made that claim and when challenged, you were impotent to produce such a claim.

Yes - when you make a claim and it is challenged, it is your responsibility to back it up with proof.

You did indeed and the worst thing about you is you cannot admit you are wrong, total immaturity on your part. Over 111000 posts and not once have you admitted being wrong. you are truly a legend in your own mind. I posted your quote and still you refused to acknowledge it. You are an example of the intellectual bankruptcy of liberalism

 

[Conservative]

The Mueller Report has over 150 pages about Russian interference in the election. But you want to wallow in willful ignorance and not read it while you pretend you can discuss the subject at the same time.

150 pages and you cannot give a couple sentences to support your claims. Russia didn't force people to vote for Trump, Hillary did and the people are getting their just reward.

 

[Beowulf]

You did indeed and the worst thing about you is you cannot admit you are wrong, total immaturity on your part. Over 111000 posts and not once have you admitted being wrong. you are truly a legend in your own mind. I posted your quote and still you refused to acknowledge it. You are an example of the intellectual bankruptcy of liberalism

But he does use the word "impotent" fairly frequently, so that's something.

 

[Beowulf]

150 pages and you cannot give a couple sentences to support your claims. Russia didn't force people to vote for Trump, Hillary did and the people are getting their just reward.

Nobody has shown evidence of ballot-stuffing by Russian.

 

[haymarket]

I just told you that I read it.

The part you cited doesn't say anything about how Russian interfered.

If you actually did read it - then you did not comprehend what you read since you are asking about what the Report contains. Your own protestations betray your own questions to which you already should have the answers if you really did read the report.

 

[haymarket]

Nobody has shown evidence of ballot-stuffing by Russian.

I know of nobody in any position of responsibility has ever claimed there was. It is senseless for you to even make such a statement since it is not not nor ever was the issue.

 

[Beowulf]

If you actually did read it - then you did not comprehend what you read since you are asking about what the Report contains. Your own protestations betray your own questions to which you already should have the answers if you really did read the report.

Actually, I'm asking about what you stated:

The Report makes it very very very clear that Russian interfered in the election and they helped Trump.

How did the report make it very very very clear that Russian interfered in the election?

 

[Beowulf]

I know of nobody in any position of responsibility has ever claimed there was. It is senseless for you to even make such a statement since it is not not nor ever was the issue.

Right. No no ballot-stuffing, as you admit. No interference with the election.

 

[haymarket]

150 pages and you cannot give a couple sentences to support your claims. Russia didn't force people to vote for Trump, Hillary did and the people are getting their just reward.

Its all in the report. Among other sources which detail the same sad events.

But just for you - here is a Cliffs notes summary of the Russian interference - complete with over 500 pages of footnotes so you can check each claim out yourself.

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

[Beowulf]

The Report makes it very very very clear that Russian interfered in the election and they helped Trump.

There's no way that they were able to gain access to the voting machines across the country.

 

[Conservative]

But he does use the word "impotent" fairly frequently, so that's something.

I don't think that poster has a clue what is being posted, over 111K posts and not one memorable one, just lies and distortions

 

[haymarket]

Right. No no ballot-stuffing, as you admit. No interference with the election.

That is a ridiculous post as the last sentence openly and utterly disagrees with the conclusion of the Mueller Report and our own intelligence services and numerous Congressional investigations.

You have reduced yourself to not even making sense with such statements.

 

[Beowulf]

I don't think that poster has a clue what is being posted, over 111K posts and not one memorable one, just lies and distortions

Apparently the Russians are very involved in US social media. Go figure.

 

[Beowulf]

That is a ridiculous post as the last sentence openly and utterly disagrees with the conclusion of the Mueller Report and our own intelligence services and numerous Congressional investigations.

You have reduced yourself to not even making sense with such statements.

So are you saying that there was ballot-stuffing by the Russians?

 

[Conservative]

Its all in the report. Among other sources which detail the same sad events.

But just for you - here is a Cliffs notes summary of the Russian interference - complete with over 500 pages of footnotes so you can check each claim out yourself.

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections - Wikipedia

No, that doesn't get it, Russia didn't force me to vote for Trump, Hillary did. your idea of interference is nothing more than leftwing rhetoric and arrogance that prevents you from admitting that you are wrong and interference in your opinion is propaganda in the real world. Hillary lost get over it.

 

[haymarket]

So are you saying that there was ballot-stuffing by the Russians?

A reticulated cranistan indifrates estalinguism.

 

[Conservative]

So are you saying that there was ballot-stuffing by the Russians?

Haymarket doesn't really have a clue over 111,000 posts all partisan and none accurate. no laws broken

 

[Beowulf]

A reticulated cranistan indifrates estalinguism.

Agreed. There was no ballot-stuffing. There was not any interference with the electoral process.

 

[Beowulf]

Haymarket doesn't really have a clue over 111,000 posts all partisan and none accurate. no laws broken

I've met many looters over the years. I am no longer surprised.