I'm curious, are there any conspiracy theories that you don't buy into? The moon landings? JFK, Chemtrails, Bigfoot?
Unlikely, I buy into zero conspiracy theories. Oswald acted alone, Men landed on the moon, Chemtrails have been debunked and Bigfoot isn't real.If we could really discuss it in detail, it's highly likely that I buy into fewer conspiracy theories than you.
It seems you believe any conspiracy theory the government puts forth, and do not like to ask questions or gather facts.
Either way, it doesn't really matter.
How did those rather convenient peasants see through the 4000m almost total cloud cover that day then ?
Is there no theory too outlandish that you won't automatically push if it fits your weird anti western sensibilities ?
BellingCat is but a group supporting the official story. They don't work with facts, only disinformation.
The BBC footage I saw on Day 1 or 2, the one taken down so quickly, showed clear blue skies.
Belling cat were posting dashcam vids from passing cars, and pix and selfies from the BUK crews themselves as they traveled to and from the scene of their crime.
BellingCat is but a group supporting the official story. They don't work with facts, only disinformation.
The BBC footage I saw on Day 1 or 2, the one taken down so quickly, showed clear blue skies.
BellingCat is but a group supporting the official story. They don't work with facts, only disinformation.
The BBC footage I saw on Day 1 or 2, the one taken down so quickly, showed clear blue skies.
The real question is how long till Thoreau runs away from this thread. If he hasn't already. He has a habit of doing that in the CT section."Hardtalk" has been running an interview this week with a Russian functionary denying everything but his name... It'll be here soon if not already..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p004t1s0/episodes/downloads
That didn't take long at all.The real question is how long till Thoreau runs away from this thread. If he hasn't already. He has a habit of doing that in the CT section.
Simpleχity;1066370598 said:That didn't take long at all.
I think Thoreau72 is trying to pollute this thread with CT nonsense hoping a mod may come along and perhaps move the thread to the CT forum and out of the *Breaking News* limelight.
BellingCat is but a group supporting the official story. They don't work with facts, only disinformation.
The BBC footage I saw on Day 1 or 2, the one taken down so quickly, showed clear blue skies.
Unlikely, I buy into zero conspiracy theories. Oswald acted alone, Men landed on the moon, Chemtrails have been debunked and Bigfoot isn't real.
It showed nothing of the sort and I'm British and certainly saw exactly the same footage that you claim yoi did :roll:
This isn't the CT forum.The US Ministry of Propaganda.....
Speaking of things you claim are taken down. I can't help but notice you continue to ignore the photos I posted. Any particular reason for that.
Simpleχity;1066371813 said:This isn't the CT forum.
The US was not a member of the Dutch MH-17 inquiry.
:failpail:
Right, and Bill Clinton did not have sex with that woman, James Earl Ray killed MLK, and OBL was killed at Abbottabad. Pretty typical for an average american, believing so many things that are false.
Actually I happen to agree on the moon landings, and am neutral on the chemtrails thing.
No, unless the post was lost, I did respond to your photos this monrning. I noted that you picture of the wing you showed might have been reversed or something, but did not appear to be the same one I had seen 2 years ago and about which the Canadian fellow on the initial investigatory group commented. That one was the left wing upper surface, outboard section.
Yours this morning appeared to be the right wing.
Simply put gents, the reason the US media version was from "anonymous Pentagon sources" is because that's how they roll. Never assign a statement to an individual, and never back up a statement with facts or evidence. We are an exceptional country with an exceptional government.
Exceptionally deceptive and mendacious. :mrgreen:
Well my British friend, we will have to agree to disagree. I was paying attention since this happened, and still am.
The US Ministry of Propaganda pushed this story from the very beginning, and has never once even attempted to back up its claims against Russia with any facts or evidence. True, that is the American style these days, just as the Downing Street Memo suggested more than 10 years ago.
Well my British friend, we will have to agree to disagree. I was paying attention since this happened, and still am.
The US Ministry of Propaganda pushed this story from the very beginning, and has never once even attempted to back up its claims against Russia with any facts or evidence. True, that is the American style these days, just as the Downing Street Memo suggested more than 10 years ago.
Not to hijack this topic, but the ubiquity of citing Russia's veto of a UN security council resolution that would've set up an international tribunal to bring the perpetrators to justice as a strong indicator of complicity and wrongdoing caught my attention. The U.S vetoed numerous such attempts aiming to hold Israel accountable for its actions in the territories; does that mean the U.S backs state-sponsored terrorism and massive violations of international law?
No you invented a fantasy you now fully indulge
So the Americans did it then ?
BS
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?