- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 31,052
- Reaction score
- 22,257
- Location
- US of A
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Simpleχity;1066363291 said:I told you over a year ago that this day would come, and then the lies would be exposed for all to see.
Well that day is here, and every major print/online paper in the world is driving a stake into Moscow's lies, subterfuge, and conspiracy theories.
Why was the launcher moved into Russia, after the shoot down?
You are probably one of the most gullible people I have ever met. You fell for that nonsense that's nukes were used to bring down the twin towers.For those able to see through the bull**** propaganda, and for those knowledgeable of the ways of the Pentagon over the decades, the lies were exposed and obvious from the very beginning.
Never once did the US and NATO present any facts or evidence to support their claims. No satellite info, no radar info, nothing at all but hints and allegations from "anonymous sources".
You and the media may be gullible enough to believe well known liars, but I am not.
I'm not sure that even happened. So far nobody has proved that a BUK was fired there, much less that its launcher was moved.
Why did the left wing upper surface have a bullet crease, and why was that photo so quickly removed? Why was the BBC piece with the testimony of the peasants regarding climbing fighters so quickly removed? Why was Carlos the Spaniard controller's Twitter account so quickly removed, and where did he go? Why was the routing and altitude assignment for the flight changed in Kiev airspace, and who was responsible? Why has Kiev kept all that ATC stuff secret for all these years?
Because they have something to hide--the same reason most people keep things secret.
Oh boy. Another Thoreau fairy tale about something being pulled from the Internet. Don't you remember what happened last time you tried this nonsense in the thread talking about the san bernardino shooting. Remember what happened there.
And just because you think something looks like a bullet hole or a bullet crease does not mean that is what it is. In fact I would be willing to bet that it isn't. And with your track record it's a pretty safe bet.
I am not even claiming there was a crease. Judging by your lack of honesty in previous posts I wouldn't be surprised if there never even was one to begin with.Good--show me the picture of the crease across the top surface of the outboard left wing. And after you show it to me, send a copy to the NATO gang. They are so interested in the facts I'm sure they will greatly appreciate it. :lamo
I am not even claiming there was a crease. Judging by your lack of honesty in previous posts I wouldn't be surprised if there never even was one to begin with.
Oh there was, and there were dozens of other rounds impacted the left side of the cockpit. The airplane took serious and fatal cannon fire from at least one fighter, the same fighters described by peasants on the ground and shown by the Russian radar provided to the international community within days of the incident.
Neither you nor the Pentagon nor anybody else can provide any evidence at all of a BUK launch. They have not even tried to prove the official charges, because those charges CANNOT be proved.
Sure I am supposed to just take your word for it. As many times as you have been wrong or been caught telling fairytales.
So tell me if there was such obvious proof it was not a missile that brought down the plane why exactly is Russia not proving it. They could give the west a major black eye and prove their innocence. You don't think there were Russian Intel folks that saved those mystery images you claim were taken down from the net. You think none of the pro Russia rebels took photos of the wreckage while they were there.
And why exactly are the Maylasian members of the investigation team going along with this seeing as you claim it was shot down by the US as payback for that kangaroo court that no one cared about.
The level of silliness in your claims just proves how gullible you are. There is virtually nothing you won't fall for as long as it either makes the US look bad or Russia good. It's really rather pathetic.
Russia and Malaysia understand full well how corrupt the west is. The damage has been done, the people are dead and the sanctions were applied against Russia right after it happened.
As William Casey noted, the success of any disinformation program will be judged when everything the American people believe is false. Just like JFK, MLK, 911 and the Gulf Of Tonkin, the disinformation applied against the American people have been very successful. You are a perfect example of that.
Oh there was, and there were dozens of other rounds impacted the left side of the cockpit. The airplane took serious and fatal cannon fire from at least one fighter, the same fighters described by peasants on the ground and shown by the Russian radar provided to the international community within days of the incident.
Neither you nor the Pentagon nor anybody else can provide any evidence at all of a BUK launch. They have not even tried to prove the official charges, because those charges CANNOT be proved.
So they could easily prove their innocence and expose the west for being corrupt but they simply choose not. Only to a CT true believer does that make any type of sense.
So tell me how are they keeping all the investigators, all the international media, all the local people that were at the crash site and all the rebels that were there from exposing the truth. Only in CT fairytale land does that make sense
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Pentagon didn't investigate or write the JIT Report.For those able to see through the bull**** propaganda, and for those knowledgeable of the ways of the Pentagon over the decades, the lies were exposed and obvious from the very beginning.
No sir, they cannot easily prove their innocence, not at all. The western propaganda machine is far superior to anything the Russians might say. They were not invited to the NATO process.
They provided radar information within days, but the western media rolled over that, insisting that "anonymous sources" at the Pentagon were superior to any radar data from the area.
I guess you really have no reference point to understand what a kangaroo court is? No surprise.
Simpleχity;1066370365 said:The Pentagon didn't investigate or write the JIT Report.
The Dutch government did.
Is the Dutch government now also part of your ever-widening conspiracy theory?
Simpleχity;1066370369 said:MH17 Investigation Says All Evidence Points to Russia
Flight MH-17 Investigation Points To Missile From Russia
MH17 shot down by missile from Russia, over 100 people being investigated: Dutch inquiry team
Open-Source Activists Vindicated After Latest MH17 Report Blames Russia
MH17 – Potential Suspects and Witnesses from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade
MH17 air crash probe prompted secret missile tests in Finland
How Russia Has Obscured the Facts In the MH17 Investigation
Putin Sets His Disinformation Trolls on the MH17 Investigators
Russian hackers harassed journalists who were investigating Malaysia Airlines plane crash
Russian separatist rebel who flipped proved key witness to Joint Investigation Team
MH17: The tragedy in pictures
Vladimir Putin’s Outlaw State
Vladimir Putin, War Criminal
Simpleχity;1066370365 said:The Pentagon didn't investigate or write the JIT Report.
The Dutch government did.
Is the Dutch government now also part of your ever-widening conspiracy theory?
LOL, that's like saying Bill Clinton didn't write the report, Hillary did. :lol:
No sir, they cannot easily prove their innocence, not at all. The western propaganda machine is far superior to anything the Russians might say. They were not invited to the NATO process.
They provided radar information within days, but the western media rolled over that, insisting that "anonymous sources" at the Pentagon were superior to any radar data from the area.
I guess you really have no reference point to understand what a kangaroo court is? No surprise.
Oh there was, and there were dozens of other rounds impacted the left side of the cockpit. The airplane took serious and fatal cannon fire from at least one fighter, the same fighters described by peasants on the ground and shown by the Russian radar provided to the international community within days of the incident.
Neither you nor the Pentagon nor anybody else can provide any evidence at all of a BUK launch. They have not even tried to prove the official charges, because those charges CANNOT be proved.