- Joined
- Dec 5, 2009
- Messages
- 23,580
- Reaction score
- 18,051
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You're making a fool of yourself.
This is hilarious...you think you really have something here? Interesting. I guess if someone in sports says, "We're going to beat their (the other team's) ass!" to you it actually means they are going to be swatting them on the behind a lot.
Keep steering, though. You're only digging yourself deeper.
See post #13. They already have started paying for it.
Introduction: The provision of the Patriot Act, Section 326 -the "know your
customer" provision, compelling financial institutions to demand identity
documents before opening accounts or conducting financial transactions is a
fundamental element of the outline below. That section authorized the
executive branch to issue detailed regulations on the subject, found at 31 CFR
130.120-121. It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-
10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year
after year. There are several ways to compel Mexico to pay for the wall
including the following:
Visa fees: Even a small increase in visa fees would pay for the wall. This
includes fees on border crossing cards, of which more than 1 million are
issued a year.
Our border is being breached daily by criminals. We must build a wall & deduct costs from Mexican foreign aid!
So you're already not counting things like....
Ford Cancels $1.6 Billion Mexico Plant, Invests $700M in Michigan | Fortune
Why?
Is that a yes or no for you?
That's all you have is a typo? :lamo
Trump was conning some rubes by saying that Mexico would pay for a wall. He got them to chant it over and over like a nursery rhyme. I don't think "yes" / "no" applies.
Seriously, what it meant to me is that Trump would never ask me to pay for it. But asking me to pay for it is what Trump is now trying to do. He lied. His cult lied when they repeated his lie.
Because Trump is not getting (or even demanding) one dime of "pay for" in his Great Wall Of Trump (GWOT) 'budget' bill.
That is most likely the reason Trump has not declared a "national emergency" which would "repurpose" existing funds to build the GWOT. If he did so then we the sheeple could see exactly what federal spending allocations Trump feels were less important than building (small portions of?) the GWOT and how much per mile the GWOT actually costs.
You don't see McConnell explaining that $5.7B is being taken from federal programs A, B and C to be used instead for funding the GWOT - it is simply being "funded" by additional deficit spending which republicants constantly pretend to oppose.
Because Trump is not getting (or even demanding) one dime of "pay for" in his Great Wall Of Trump (GWOT) 'budget' bill.
That is most likely the reason Trump has not declared a "national emergency" which would "repurpose" existing funds to build the GWOT. If he did so then we the sheeple could see exactly what federal spending allocations Trump feels were less important than building (small portions of?) the GWOT and how much per mile the GWOT actually costs.
You don't see McConnell explaining that $5.7B is being taken from federal programs A, B and C to be used instead for funding the GWOT - it is simply being "funded" by additional deficit spending which republicants constantly pretend to oppose.
I just gave you an example and you ignored it. Why?
The levels of belligerence from Trump and his supporters on this point is so deranged it's beyond imagination.
Like anyone believed there was going to be a ceremony where a giant cheque like a Lottery Winner was going to be handed over to Trump while the angels sang.
lol. i love easy debates.
See post#13. They are already paying for it.
Probably because it’s ridiculous.
#13?
That was something about Ford. If Mexico is already paying for it why is Trump shutting down the government to get money to pay for it?
:inandout:
Why do you say that?
How can any Trumpkin with a sound mind defend Trump on this issue when it is so crystal clear he absolutely said Mexico would pay for the wall and even told Hannity in an interview they could write a check?
oh wait - I think I just answered my own question.
Never mind.
You love continue to embarrass yourself by thinking it meant a literal check? See post #28 as you're even mocked by anti-Trumpers as basically being "no one".
Right, right...and how was it related to Mexico? I want to see if you'll ignore that point a second time.
Do you even know what Mexico is?
"GWOT"?
I'm not sure you can use that yet. The "global war on terror" hasn't been terminated.
It's a ****ing joke, don't let them drag you into this clown show of a debate, it's ridiculous and it's a bad joke.
Answer the question.
How many people took that to mean that Mexico would write a literal check for the wall and not getting that through other means (e.g. trade agreements, tariffs, lower illegal immigration, stopping jobs from being outsourced to Mexico, ect)?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?