No, I'm just mocking the ridiculous way you're trying to deflect from the fact the speech was plagiarized and the fact you denied it was plagiarized. The fact you don't see it doesn't surprise me.
You're the one who did not tell the truth about denying plagiarism. And you're the one who accused others of not wanting to talk about the speech, only to proceed to show no interest in talking about the speech when I offered to do so.
I find your reply here amusing, for multiple reasons. You're doing everything you can to distract from the fact I completely dismantled you in this thread, but you still want to defend your ego, so you post nothing of consequence. You don't try to defend your position, because you know your position is indefensible.
Fat chance of that happening.
I know. It's amazing really...I freely admit I have an enormous e-ego, but when I'm wrong, I own up to it. Some people can have their mistakes put directly in front of their face, and they'll still deny it happened. It's like when a criminal is caught on camera doing something illegal, and you can clearly identify the criminal, but they still deny it's them. It's simply mind-blowing.
How do you "accidentally" write someone else's words down and include them in a speech? How does one "accidentally" do that? The speechwriter admitted she wrote down quotes of Obama that Melania gave her and then included them in the speech. The speechwriter knew where the quotes came from and still included them without credit. There's no way to accidentally do that.
