• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Megyn Kelly is tired that we can't celebrate blonde, blue eyed white people.

CaughtInThe

CaughtInThe

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
144,992
Reaction score
165,616
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Imagine being so desperate to be oppressed. That’s entitlement right there.



bafkreiggtyjylyvym3d4cr7wsxs55jgvg5ig66io7vmkurzwvj36f4ybnm@jpeg


Megyn Kelly turns 50: Where she's been, and where she is now
 
Assuming she is talking about the Jeans add, I get the frustration at the backlash it received, the backlash was not deserved.

Although she is probably just trying to stir the pot with that post.
 
Classic beauty and brains don't coexist under the left's dogma.
 
daeler said:
Assuming she is talking about the Jeans add, I get the frustration at the backlash it received, the backlash was not deserved.

Although she is probably just trying to stir the pot with that post.
Click to expand...
Of course she is. She is not driven by ideology but by money
 
SCrider said:
She is just cashing in on trumps racist followers. She knows how to keep them listening
Click to expand...
This has been going on ever since Nixon's southern strategy. The plutocracy in this country learned that they could play on racism to keep the plutocracy going. Powerful coalition there. Still going strong after all these decades.
 
The poor bleach bottle blonde has to work very hard to remain relevant and competitive with the younger women vying for media attention.
 
CaughtInThe said:
Imagine being so desperate to be oppressed. That’s entitlement right there.



bafkreiggtyjylyvym3d4cr7wsxs55jgvg5ig66io7vmkurzwvj36f4ybnm@jpeg


Megyn Kelly turns 50: Where she's been, and where she is now's been, and where she is now
Click to expand...

Are blond, blue-eyed white people somehow evil or less deserving of validation than people with other physical characteristics?
 
ataraxia said:
What oppression?
Click to expand...
That's a question for Megyn Kelly, as I didn't make any claims about that. I responded to what I quoted, no more no less.

My point was, if white people have fair and legitimate complaints about being oppressed today, the answer should not be "shut up you were privileged for centuries so you deserve it now!"
 
CaughtInThe said:
Imagine being so desperate to be oppressed. That’s entitlement right there.



bafkreiggtyjylyvym3d4cr7wsxs55jgvg5ig66io7vmkurzwvj36f4ybnm@jpeg


Megyn Kelly turns 50: Where she's been, and where she is now's been, and where she is now
Click to expand...

This whole genes thing is another example of the right creating a strawman and then ganging up on it.

I'm pretty sure that only a tiny minority of liberals have a problem with Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad.

Sydney Sweeney is beautiful because she has great genes. That doesn't mean that you have to have blue eyes or blonde hair. Sydney Sweeney is famous for her breasts not her blue eyes. This has nothing to do with race.

But the Right will jump on any comment by a liberal and make it seem like this is how all or most liberals think.

The right has had great success using the views of extreme liberals to label all liberals.
 
The issue didn't seem to be that she was blond, but that it came from superior genes.

I suppose that's a given for the likes of Megyn Kelly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom