Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
Undoubtedly!Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
That seems the be the latest talking point from the leftist. They talk about it all the time. Problem is when you ask them how they are planning on paying for it they don't want to talk about that.
That seems the be the latest talking point from the leftist. They talk about it all the time. Problem is when you ask them how they are planning on paying for it they don't want to talk about that.
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
That seems the be the latest talking point from the leftist. They talk about it all the time. Problem is when you ask them how they are planning on paying for it they don't want to talk about that.
Undoubtedly!
I was on this bandwagon well before it became fashionable. Before some on this forum were born, and that's not an exaggeration.
TRhat's completely false. Bernie explains how it's all paid for in great detail.:shrug:
“Capitalistic price and quality controls”?
Now the question is how it's paid for,
Bernie is a communist so in the end everyone ends up very very poor if not starving to death. Ever heard of Cuba/Florida, East/West Germany? We have already run that experiment, 120 million died, but because our liberals are so perfectly illiterate we have to do it over and over again.
Your posts illustrate an astounding, unique and complete misunderstanding of politics in general.:roll:
:
???? at 20% of current price it would be very very easy to pay for
Well how exactly do you get there?
Your posts illustrate an astounding, unique and complete misunderstanding of politics in general.:roll:
Judging from your postings to date, you're simply not qualified to speak on the subject, AT ALL, yet, here you are....:roll:
ever see a conservative who thinks a personal attack is better than substantive reply?? What does that teach us about liberalism? It's based in ignorance!
NO, you simply know almost NOTHING about the subjects you spout on about.:roll:
“Capitalistic price and quality controls”?
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
If so why are you so afraid to present your best example? What did we learn from your liberal fear?
You're steeped in ignorance
Obviously if true you would not be so afraid to present your best example and look really smart? What did we learn from your liberal fear? Ever see a conservative who has to run from a debate?
Notice the way liberalism looks legitimate when presented by the MSM but when pressed to explain it you immediately see how worthless and ignorant it is?
Why does everyone have to be on Medicare? If people have coverage, why cant they stay on it. If people have pre-existing conditions, let them go on Medicare. Whats wrong with that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?