• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

McCabe Admits to DOJ Seditious Conspiracy

srexob715 said:
Well sure, if you are ****ing stupid. Typed that out to not violate rule 6a...…….the word censor.
Click to expand...

Some Bolsheviks are just blind. Some are stupid. Some know what they are promoting and wickedly do it anyway.
 
Grokmaster said:
UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT LEFTOVERS of the Obama Swamp...were planning to remove the DULY-ELECTED POTUS for daring to EXERCISE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY...




McCabe Admits to DOJ Sedition, Discussed Illegal Removing the POTUS


Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, has claimed that there were meetings in the Justice Department following James Comey’s firing in which officials discussed whether it was possible to remove Donald Trump from the presidency using the 25th Amendment.

Correspondent Scott Pelley told CBS This Morning that McCabe made the admission during an interview with 60 Minutes. McCabe, who was named acting director of the bureau after Trump fired James Comey in May 2017, is currently promoting his new book The Threat.

McCabe is the first person who was involved in the meeting to claim that it happened on record—Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, previously denied a report from The New York Times that he discussed recruiting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment.



McCabe: DoJ Held Meetings to Discuss Removing Trump Under the 25th Amendment After Comey'''s Firing


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...
So stupid!:2rofll:
 
Rich2018 said:
So now it takes courage to follow an unprofitable course of action ?


I guess Trump must be a true hero then judging by the balance sheets of his businesses...
Click to expand...

Not that I accept your rather gross mischaracterization of those events, but exactly what would have been a profitable course of action?
 
Idiometer said:
In this case, he doesn't. His remark was based on a specific context, one given to him by a Fox News pundit, not the people who actually had a discussion about possible maybe invoking the 25th. Dershowitz seems to have been under the impression that they actually approached Pence and one or more cabinet secretaries, which is not the case. Like I said, he spoke out of turn without having the salient facts. It happens to the best of us. Dershowitz is a man, not a demigod.
Click to expand...

Dershowitz is 100% right. McCabe, Rosenstein, etc. have no legal business talking about invoking the 25th amendment or anything else. Also, the "specific context" is the one McCabe himself admitted to. It has nothing whatever to do with Fox. Besides, Dershowitz is only on Fox because the rest of the MSM doesn't want to have their bubble burst by actual points of law they cannot refute. Therefore, they don't want to listen to Dershowitz.
 
eohrnberger said:
It's one thing to discuss something, quite another to actually do something.

I've not been following that closely, but what steps to actually remove the sitting president on grounds of the 25th amendment were taken?
Click to expand...

Well, people might conspire to do lots of things without actually doing them. It's still a conspiracy. The fact that they were discussing it gives credence to the deep state claims people have been making all along vis a vis a remove Trump cabal operating at high levels.
 
veritas1 said:
Well, people might conspire to do lots of things without actually doing them. It's still a conspiracy. The fact that they were discussing it gives credence to the deep state claims people have been making all along vis a vis a remove Trump cabal operating at high levels.
Click to expand...

True. So you'd be fully reasonable to expect that the US AG would be filing conspiracy charges against all those who met and discussed this? Could be. Maybe. But I rather doubt that's going to happen. Frankly, it probably should happen, as a deterrent, so that it doesn't happen again in the future.

The evidence that's come out supporting a politically motivated anti-Trump 'Deep-State' cabal more than sufficiently supports the conclusion that it existed, and probably still exists today.

All those Deep-State nay-sayers, the same who've been gaslighting that there's Trump / Russian collusion to a large extent, now have 2 reasons hang their heads in shame, and survey what's left of their shattered credibility.
 
Grokmaster said:
Wrong as usual.


Do I need to EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?


If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

For a seditious conspiracy charge to be effected, a crime need only be planned,
Click to expand...

Ouch! That must have stung!
 
SonOfDaedalus said:
Trump is a traitor working for Russia. He was secretly negotiating a deal to build a tower in Moscow and maybe offer Putin a free penthouse. Trump is not acting in the best interests of the U.S. He's acting in his own financial best interest. How can you be so blind to that?
Click to expand...

You got any real evidence of that charge?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, they have the right and the authority to discuss any provision of the Constitution.

Sorry you're having such a hard time with this.

Another easy win
Click to expand...

You keep claiming "wins", yet you have ZERO. It appears you need to look up the word.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! It's fun to watch people spew the same dishonest crap, desperately hoping that it might someday, somehow, magically come true.

Trump cannot fire Comey if it was for corrupt purposes, and he's admitted at least twice in public that it was.

Why do you love corruption and crime?
Click to expand...

Why do you continue to spew the same dishonest crap?
 
Now that enough of the scandal has finally come out . . .
The tale we’ve been told for more than two years—that Donald Trump’s campaign team, possibly even the candidate himself, colluded with the Kremlin to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election—has been exposed as a lie. Various investigations into this alleged conspiracy are coming up empty and the accomplices are trying to change the subject. Even more pathetically, some still are clinging to the farce, desperate to salvage whatever still remains of their already sketchy credibility.

To describe it as a witch hunt, the president’s preferred term, is too generous. The American public has witnessed a seditious attempt by powerful interests garrisoned throughout our political complex to overthrow a sitting U.S. president. The orchestrated and failed coup has exceeded the routine combat of our two-party system, where out-of-power partisans disrupt and agitate the other side. No, this has been a full scale insurrection that has violated the boundaries of law, normalcy, and civility in an unprecedented way.

Both Democrats and Republicans have been complicit. The national news media have acted as hatchet men. Influential public officials, operating both inside and outside of government, have aided the stratagem. One of the main culprits just revealed—no, bragged—how a handful of corrupt bureaucrats plotted unlawfully to remove the president from the Oval Office based on the fantastical scheme.

It’s the kind of treachery that is supposed to animate banana republics or Soviet-style regimes—not our country.

And now that the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed this week that their two-year investigation—which involved the interrogation of 200 witnesses and a review of 300,000 documents—will find no evidence of collusion, the aftermath of this scandal is coming into view. How it plays out is anyone’s guess at this point, but one thing is evident: There is deep rage at what has happened not just to this president but to this country—and people want answers.
After the Coup is Gone
Click to expand...

Yes, there was, and probably still is, an anti-Trump Deep State.
Yes, the plotting unlawfully to remove a president is akin to banana republics or Soviet-style regimes.
And yes, I suspect that it leads all the way to the top of the previous administration.
 
eohrnberger said:
Now that enough of the scandal has finally come out . . .


Yes, there was, and probably still is, an anti-Trump Deep State.
Yes, the plotting unlawfully to remove a president is akin to banana republics or Soviet-style regimes.
And yes, I suspect that it leads all the way to the top of the previous administration.
Click to expand...

Agreed. ^^^^^^^
 
Tanngrisnir said:
It's OK that you cannot back up your claim.

I expected nothing else.
Click to expand...

And you'll get nothing else. You have become a doorstop on this forum. Your unsubstantiated "win" claims are predictable, and so far 100% wrong. A waste of time.
 
Grokmaster said:
UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT LEFTOVERS of the Obama Swamp...were planning to remove the DULY-ELECTED POTUS for daring to EXERCISE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY...




McCabe Admits to DOJ Sedition, Discussed Illegal Removing the POTUS


Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, has claimed that there were meetings in the Justice Department following James Comey’s firing in which officials discussed whether it was possible to remove Donald Trump from the presidency using the 25th Amendment.

Correspondent Scott Pelley told CBS This Morning that McCabe made the admission during an interview with 60 Minutes. McCabe, who was named acting director of the bureau after Trump fired James Comey in May 2017, is currently promoting his new book The Threat.

McCabe is the first person who was involved in the meeting to claim that it happened on record—Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, previously denied a report from The New York Times that he discussed recruiting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment.



McCabe: DoJ Held Meetings to Discuss Removing Trump Under the 25th Amendment After Comey'''s Firing


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...

Well we all know who leaked the story to the NYT claiming Rosenstein had suggested wearing a wire and discussing the 25th amendment. It was McCabe. That doesn't come as any surprise. After all, isn't that what got him fired? And after his interview he has already walked back some of his comments.

McCabe is in a lot of legal trouble and his book sales are needed to pay his legal fees. His interview was by design to influence a pool of potential jurors. But there's a new sheriff in town by the name of Barr. McCabe's ass is grass and Barr is the lawnmower.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom