- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No one has said that....That is a strawman argument by definition.
You are just so cute with your "thats a lie" comments. :lamo
Even Cal Rerucha, the prosecutor who had pushed for the death sentence for McKinney and Henderson, would later concede on ABC’s 20/20 that “it was a murder that was driven by drugs.”
Did you?
The Avocate still calls it a hate crime
DRUG related. Not gay bashing, not because he was gay...high on meth. Or...perhaps you have a countering statement from the prosecutor?Because the perp was high on meth
SWEEEEET...do tell where I say ALL gay people should not be trusted.Actually, VanceMack said that
Because the perp was high on meth
Thats because 'he lies'...And was also a casual lover of the victim, whom also was a user of meth...I see drugs more to blame than the meme of homophobia that you seem to think was the reason.
"Kind of".....:laughat: Sangha
DRUG related. Not gay bashing, not because he was gay...high on meth. Or...perhaps you have a countering statement from the prosecutor?
And was also a casual lover of the victim, whom also was a user of meth...I see drugs more to blame than the meme of homophobia that you seem to think was the reason.
Who..the perpetrator, the accomplice, the victim, all of the above? And since the prosecutor did not say "because of drugs and he was gay", I guess that means....YOU LIE!Because he was gay.
Who..the perpetrator, the accomplice, the victim, all of the above? And since the prosecutor did not say "because of drugs and he was gay", I guess that means....YOU LIE!
:lamo
The Advocate makes the allowance that it may be because the PERPETRATOR suffered from SELF HATRED...making it a 'type of hate crime', not an anti gay hate crime. You are intentionally misrepresenting their comments. THEY manage to view the book and situation in an unbiased manner. You...do not. You...lie.Yes, there are different kinds of hate crimes
This murder was a hate crime. Even the Advocate says so, even though you have repeatedly lied about the Advocates position on this matter
Quote offered...and all you have to do is counter it. Or keep making your statements without foundation. You know...lying.The prosecutor didn't say "because of drugs" either
OK...Im fine with the "tigger" anti-gay component. Now...how often have you seen pro gay individuals excuse and justify their across the board intolerance of anti-ssm types (people you accept as NOT anti-gay but rather people with a different belief system than yours) with cute little slogans like "I have no requirement to be tolerant of your bigotry!"? More than a few? Said it yourself maybe?
The Advocate makes the allowance that it may be because the PERPETRATOR suffered from SELF HATRED...making it a 'type of hate crime', not an anti gay hate crime. You are intentionally misrepresenting their comments. THEY manage to view the book and situation in an unbiased manner. You...do not. You...lie.
That is, of course, a kind of hate crime — just not as straightforward as the one we’ve embraced all these years.
Yes, there are different kinds of hate crimes
This murder was a hate crime. Even the Advocate says so, even though you have repeatedly lied about the Advocates position on this matter
Quote offered...and all you have to do is counter it. Or keep making your statements without foundation. You know...lying.
THEY manage to view the book and situation in an unbiased manner.
You are changing the context of what the Advocate said...They clearly were using "kind of" as in reaching to justify and continuing to advocate for the LGBT community as a whole...They were not saying that the crime itself was actually a hate crime...IOW, they were just saving face at that point in the article.
That is, of course, a kind of hate crime — just not as straightforward as the one we’ve embraced all these years.
You have countered nothing. You...lie.No, all you have offered is a butchered quote and even that has been countered.
The Advocate says that it is a hate crime, even if the author is right.
You are intentionally misrepresenting their comments
Good question. You see..."The Advocate" is a pro gay website. The article IN The Advocate is written by a man that is gay, and happens to be the editor in chief of "Out" magazine. Oh...but I suppose it is POSSIBLE he is just filled with self hatred and self loathing and THAT is why he gave it a 'fair' review'...And how do you know this? How do you know they are viewing it in an unbiased manner?
You have countered nothing. You...lie.
BTW..how are you coming on that whole "Actually, VanceMack said that" lie? YoU DO know the original comment was made by TNE and HE attributed it to J-Mac...right? You cant even keep your own lies straight. Of course..."you lie" constantly, so that MUST be hard to keep track of them all.
And how you are representing the quote is, of course a kind of lie - just not as straight forward as the one you've embraced all these years....:laughat: Sangha
That is, of course, a kind of hate crime — just not as straightforward as the one we’ve embraced all these years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?