• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Masks For The Wee One's And Not Me.

As usual liberals have no trouble acknowledging when a liberal politician makes a bone head move.
Would be very difficult not to. I guess Abrams thought she deleted it in time.
 
Do people in the public eye no longer have a PR crew that would vet shit like this? “Ma’am, we don’t think this is such a good idea”….it applies to either side of the political divide
 
Well actually people that live in more densely populated areas than Elks Snout Holler, USA do in fact wear masks in public to help fight transmission of disease. Are they all "daft"?
:rolleyes:
Yes . They are not listening to the science . Or does global science exclude your home area ?

Regardless , since when do you wear a dangerous mask to stave off the common cold ?

P.S. Probably could not find a big enough mask . Should have thrown a sheet over her .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
Seriously? You need this explained to you?

Abrams screeches for mask mandates....and yet SHE is posing for a picture MASKLESS in a room full of kids.
I'll write this slowly, finding an image of someone not wearing a mask.....is not equal to.....that individual rejecting the science of pandemic mediation.

It is a lot to digest for some folks, so take your time.
 
What was she thinking? She has since deleted it. An explanation will probably be forthcoming.

It's not like a mask was down around her chin. There's none in evidence. And she is certainly not socially distanced from her audience. Dumb move, considering how she has heaped criticism on Kemp for outlawing mask mandates in schools.
You imply "thinking" has anything to do with this?
 
Last edited:
I'll write this slowly, finding an image of someone not wearing a mask.....is not equal to.....that individual rejecting the science of pandemic mediation.

It is a lot to digest for some folks, so take your time.
There was zero reason or excuse for her to sit in a group of children, all forced to wear masks, and take HERS off for a photo (or not wear one at all)

That might be hard to digest - but try.
 
Tell me where it promotes it and we'll have a discussion.
Now you are moving the goalpost......and still not addressing the point
You're the only one triggered that I can see.
Say the guy who still cannot address the point after sips of beer.
I'm not sure I can recommend more.
 
I'll write this slowly, finding an image of someone not wearing a mask.....is not equal to.....that individual rejecting the science of pandemic mediation.

It is a lot to digest for some folks, so take your time.
Why did she not take time to avoid making a complete fool of herself ?

Did you take enough time before supporting a hypocrite whose only excuse is that they could not find a duvet big enough to cover her ?
 
I'll write this slowly, finding an image of someone not wearing a mask.....is not equal to.....that individual rejecting the science of pandemic mediation.

It is a lot to digest for some folks, so take your time.
Annnnnnnd still not getting it.

I doubt you'd get "it" if it came in a big box marked "It".
 
There was zero reason or excuse for her to sit in a group of children, all forced to wear masks, and take HERS off for a photo (or not wear one at all)

That might be hard to digest - but try.
I get that, she shouldn't have done it.....but thats not the argument at hand, it is the following equivocating that it represents her, or any other advocate of covid mediation, "rejecting the science".
It is absurd, but then that is what is considered "argument" from you and your ilk.
 
I get that, she shouldn't have done it.....but thats not the argument at hand, it is the following equivocating that it represents her, or any other advocate of covid mediation, "rejecting the science".
It is absurd, but then that is what is considered "argument" from you and your ilk.
It’s called being a hypocrite.

I’m sorry that you can’t understand that.
 
It’s called being a hypocrite.

I’m sorry that you can’t understand that.
I understand, you are going to make a claim that she has rejected science....based on a single point in time....and not defend your point.

The desperation.....so pathetic.
 
Back
Top Bottom