• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mark Meadows: VP's Office 'in Total Disarray,' 'Not the End of Mass Exodus'

Oh she's a bully. Yes, I forgot how the men who support Trump are terrified of strong women without being able to hide from them behind Trump's skirt.

So Trump's office must have been like Indonesia when we look at how many people exited during his one term. In fact, I believe everyone but the troll Stephen Miller and Mitch McConnell's wife bailed on him. Amirite?

Get over Trump's loss. He doesn't even know you're alive, and if he did, he wouldn't piss on your head if it was in flames.

^^ Deflection with a twist of accusation.
 
It is a direct reflection of the leader and their ability to lead well whom they can get to follow them, or not. This is a truism.

That so many members of Harris' direct staff are quitting speaks directly to the point above, and clearly indicates she is a poor leader.
Apparently this wasn't a thing during the last administration, because we all know trump was a great leader. /sarc
 
Apparently this wasn't a thing during the last administration, because we all know trump was a great leader. /sarc
No leader is perfect. Some are certainly better than others. Those that create a toxic work environment really are towards the bottom.
 
6 deflections and counting.

The left will ignore the very problems they screamed about, and are still crying over in this thread, to hate Trump.

If it was a problem then, it's a problem now. Additionally, the problem that is showing up here is double standards.
deflections from what, exactly?


explain the crisis that we are ignoring
 
No leader is perfect. Some are certainly better than others. Those that create a toxic work environment really are towards the bottom.
yet you time and again defend the inappropriate actions of the fellow who resides at the bottom of the list of competent presidents
 
No one made up anything. Harris' staff has quit and the rumblings of a toxic work environment have been confirmed.

Houston, we have a problem, and she's one heartbeat away from the Oval Office.
Perhaps they got the memo that Kamala isn't going to be in the Oval Office, once everyone saw what a failure she's been.
 
A search articles citing a 'toxic work environment' didn't come up with any such claims fro the Trump administration.
Would seem that Harris is even below that. 🤷‍♂️
Do you really need a news article to convince you trump was toxic? There were dozens if not hundreds who left his administration, at least one called him a ****ing moron, and I'm sure many others said it under their breath.
 
Do you really need a news article to convince you trump was toxic? There were dozens if not hundreds who left his administration, at least one called him a ****ing moron, and I'm sure many others said it under their breath.
a google search of "trump toxic":
About 34,200,000 results (0.43 seconds)
yet we see acolyte-like posts such as this:
A search articles citing a 'toxic work environment' didn't come up with any such claims fro the Trump administration.
Would seem that Harris is even below that. 🤷‍♂️
those of us who believe anything tRump touches turns to shit are legion
be assured, the traitorous bastard is toxic
 
Do you really need a news article to convince you trump was toxic? There were dozens if not hundreds who left his administration, at least one called him a ****ing moron, and I'm sure many others said it under their breath.
a google search of "trump toxic":

yet we see acolyte-like posts such as this:

those of us who believe anything tRump touches turns to shit are legion
be assured, the traitorous bastard is toxic
Is the topic specifically a 'toxic work environment'? Or just you two's opinion about Trump?
I was under the impression it was the former.
If you want to continue on about the latter, do please carry on, and carry on, and carry on, as you're sure to do.
 
Is the topic specifically a 'toxic work environment'? Or just you two's opinion about Trump?
I was under the impression it was the former.
If you want to continue on about the latter, do please carry on, and carry on, and carry on, as you're sure to do.
your argument - an insipidly stupid one at that - pretends that a google search of tRump being toxic, which reveals over 34 MILLION hits, will not include references to a toxic white house during his regime

wear that hat proudly
 
your argument - an insipidly stupid one at that - pretends that a google search of tRump being toxic, which reveals over 34 MILLION hits, will not include references to a toxic white house during his regime

wear that hat proudly
Please re-read my post. Clearly you haven't or have completely missed it. Do please carry on, and carry on, and carry on, as you're sure to do.
 
Please re-read my post. Clearly you haven't or have completely missed it. Do please carry on, and carry on, and carry on, as you're sure to do.
be assured you will attempt to deflect from the stupidity found within your posts

such as a belief that 34 MILLION google searches for "tRump toxic" will include nothing about the toxicity of the white house during his disastrous regime
 
be assured you will attempt to deflect from the stupidity found within your posts

such as a belief that 34 MILLION google searches for "tRump toxic" will include nothing about the toxicity of the white house during his disastrous regime
Dude. 'Toxic workplace' is very specific.
You seem to be bound and determined to take it off into a TDS rant / circle jerk. Do please carry on, and carry on, and carry on, as you're sure to do.
 
I any reliable news source reporting this? Newsmax? :rolleyes:
 
Dude. 'Toxic workplace' is very specific.
You seem to be bound and determined to take it off into a TDS rant / circle jerk. Do please carry on, and carry on, and carry on, as you're sure to do.
what we can see from your post is that you do not believe he oversaw a toxic workplace in the white house
but then your posts also reveal you do not see a lot of things that are obvious when it comes to tRump
wear your hat proudly
 
*Yawn*, you didn't care when the Trump administration had more turnover of top officials than any administration in history, with most of the major roles being held by 3 or 4 different people, but you pretend to care about interns here? It's just not believable.

You lack the ability to criticize Harris and Biden on policy so you just focus on ridiculous stuff like this you read on blogs.
lol. You can ABSOLUTELY criticize Harris and Biden on policy. They've been TERRIBLE. In many ways, their outcomes are making the last guy look good.

Harris being unable to keep a staff is ANOTHER issue. She's becoming a big liability to Biden and the Democrat party. VP's should be relatively vanilla - helping their president, or at least not adding problems. If she doesn't calm things down, Biden may need to make a change in 2024.

The Democrat party is going to have to come up with a candidate for President after Biden. Harris is not the answer - no way can she carry the ticket.
 
what we can see from your post is that you do not believe he oversaw a toxic workplace in the white house
but then your posts also reveal you do not see a lot of things that are obvious when it comes to tRump
wear your hat proudly
Keep diverting from Harris' toxic workplace. You are doing really well at it (but everyone is seeing it too).

All I'm saying is that toxic workplace during the Trump administration doesn't come up in an Internet search as readily as Harris' toxic workplace.

Had that been an issue during that administration I'm sure the toxic leftist media would have taken joy over joys to flog it to death the same as they did with every other possible negative during that administration, the same they did with the 'Russia Collusion!' hoax, and innumerable others.

The obvious conclusion is that a toxic workplace during that administration is not nearly the issue of the Harris toxic workplace, the sample being the leftist media reporting as indexed by Internet search engines. This conclusion leads to the next that Trump wasn't as toxic a leader as Harris appears to be.

You are free, of course, to disagree (which I'm sure your TDS will make you), with either the methods, I'll grant you rather simplistic, or the conclusion, but the Internet search results do stand on their own. Why doesn't the Internet search terms of "toxic workplace AND Trump" produce the results for which you already have a confirmation bias for? I'll leave that for you to explain if you want, or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom