- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
1.) I'm not reading lists with capital letters. Let's try makingm a concise point.
2.) You're arguing against my logic. My logic is that there's nothing wrong with Greene publicly responding to Newman's video.
3.) Newman's kid doesn't mean she is allowed to bully people.
1.) translation you can't defend the lies you got caught posting LMAO
2.) hey look ANOTHER lie, can you quote me saying that? nope cause I didnt
3.) what factually bullying? you haven't proven any
So ill ask you AGAIN and I bet another dodge is posted
1.) Newman was attacking Greene's political position.
2.) Greene defended her views.
3.) The gender conversation isn't off limits just because someone has a LGBT child.
4.) You don't have to surrender to their bullying because the Twitterati will be mad.
1.)LMAO what "political" positions . . her sign says to trust the SCIENCE which makes her look complete stupid
2.) no she FAILED at defending her views she looks like the bigoted moron she is
3.) who said that? but its not good form to not only show your bigotry but know you are expressing it to a coworkers child along with a million other American families lol
4.) what factual bullying? There was none just two ladies acting unbecoming for elected leaders and then one making a complete ass of herself