Addressing your Lozier version of PP's report and comparing it to their actual report:
First off what is Lozier trying to prove about PP by comparing 2024 statistics to 2013. The demographics, the politics, the economy and the laws have changed radically since 2013 It would be astounding if PP statistics didn't change. Why 2013, anyway.And yes abortions have gone up because of the changes in demographics etc. Abortion used to be 3% of PP's services now they are 4%.
Lozier complaines about PP's adoption rate . It's about .7%. Here's what Family Research Council says about the adoption rate of crisis pregnancy centers. Keep in mind that adoption is one of the major anti-abortion solutions to unplanned pregnancy
"The rates of adoption at pregnancy resource centers are extremely low. Although no formal statistics exist, spot-checking adoption rates at larger centers indicate that adoption rates commonly are below 1 percent."
The adoption rates of the two organizations are about the same. Lozier knows its readers aren't going to check statistics.
In reporting PP finances, Lozier again states the facts as if they were unusual and unethical if not illegal. Like Lozier's salary report they don't tell you what other organizations are doing. PP has revenues of about $2B every year. What they don't tell you is that 34% of PP revenue is private donations and bequests; 17% comes from personal payment for private services. Abortion payments are part of that 17% along with private payments for the many other services of PP. And 37% comes from comes from government payment for services (but not abortion) for Medicaid patients and grants to do studies on women's reproductive health. 10% is Other. Go to PP's 33 page full annual report and audit if you want to find out what Other is. Almost no financial information is posted by crisis pregnancy centers (cpc). However the Guardian reports that "Anti-abortion facilities raked in at least $1.4bn in revenue in the 2022 fiscal year, the year Roe v Wade fell – a staggering haul that includes at least $344m in government money, according to a memo analyzing the centers’ tax documents that was compiled by a pro-choice rights group and shared exclusively with the Guardian."
Additionally "From 1995 to 2024, researchers found, states collectively put more than $1 billion into backing these centers. Some used state funds while others repurposed Temporary Assistance for Needy Families money. Specifically since Roe’s fall in 2022, state funding has risen: $489 million was allocated in the last two years, as 19 states poured funding into anti-abortion centers.
The centers, which are not regulated as health facilities, offer services like free ultrasounds or diapers, and typically attempt to discourage people from terminating their pregnancies.
19thnews.org
The amount of private donations from anti-abortion organizations is not available nor are individual donations. Care Net Inc. is the major corporation running cpc. for Catholic and evangelical groups. They have to report financial data: They had revenues of over $5.B. Their treasurer's salary is $1, 431,976/year. Their secretary's is $983,574/year. The CEO/president is also a trustee and makes only $50,000. It would seem that the gasping over salaries should be about those of cpc 's which are run like a franchise.
Lozier is not an honest or ethical organization. And we haven't even mentioned what they do to scientific fact about abortion.
The Charlotte Lozier Institute is one of the easiest anti-abortion organizations to prove wrong.