March 2019 is the second hottest March on Record

[Sunsettommy]

Yes, the AGW advocates keep trying to find ways to get the word "warmest" into their headlines. By 2025 we may the seeing "Tenth Warmest Year" in a headline.

They keep pushing this dumb narrative since they want everyone to ignore the failed PER DECADE warming predictions/projections published by their god the IPCC.

 

[Threegoofs]

They keep pushing this dumb narrative since they want everyone to ignore the failed PER DECADE warming predictions/projections published by their god the IPCC.

Outside of denier bizarroworld, the per decade warming is about exactly as predicted.

 

[Jack Hays]

Outside of denier bizarroworld, the per decade warming is about exactly as predicted.

Another unlinked graph of no value.

 

[Threegoofs]

Another unlinked graph of no value.

Coming from someone who continually posted worthless links with no value, and who literally cannot judge the credibility of a link at all, I’m assuming this is a high compliment.

 

[Jack Hays]

Coming from someone who continually posted worthless links with no value, and who literally cannot judge the credibility of a link at all, I’m assuming this is a high compliment.

Nope. You're just continuing your practice of content-free posting.

 

[Bergslagstroll]

Yes, the AGW advocates keep trying to find ways to get the word "warmest" into their headlines. By 2025 we may the seeing "Tenth Warmest Year" in a headline.

How can you believe in global cooling, then you also believe that the "cooling" is so slow that you can have the tenth warmest year on record in 2025?

Especially since all the present ten hottest year on record have all been since 1998.

The 10 Hottest Global Years on Record | Climate Central

 

[Jack Hays]

How can you believe in global cooling, then you also believe that the "cooling" is so slow that you can have the tenth warmest year on record in 2025?

Especially since all the present ten hottest year on record have all been since 1998.

The 10 Hottest Global Years on Record | Climate Central

2016>2017>2018>. . . .

 

[Threegoofs]

2016>2017>2018>. . . .

No link. No standing.

 

[longview]

No link. No standing.

Choose your data set, they all say the same thing!

 

[Jack Hays]

Choose your data set, they all say the same thing!

Not to worry. He's just pouting because I called him on all his unlinked graphs.

 

[calamity]

104 degrees in Madrid: why Europe is so vulnerable to extreme heat

Oppressively hot weather has descended on Europe this week, with temperatures reaching 104 degrees Fahrenheit in cities like Madrid and records poised to be broken throughout the continent.

Public health warnings have been issued in Spain, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, and Switzerland.

 

[calamity]

It was 84 degrees near the Arctic Ocean this weekend as carbon dioxide hit its highest level in human history

Over the weekend, the climate system sounded simultaneous alarms. Near the entrance to the Arctic Ocean in northwest Russia, the temperature surged to 84 degrees Fahrenheit (29 Celsius). Meanwhile, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere eclipsed 415 parts per million for the first time in human history.

By themselves, these are just data points. But taken together with so many indicators of an altered atmosphere and rising temperatures, they blend into the unmistakable portrait of human-induced climate change.

...

In Koynas, a rural area to the east of Arkhangelsk, it was even hotter on Sunday, soaring to 87 degrees (31 Celsius). Many locations in Russia, from the Kazakhstan border to the White Sea, set record-high temperatures over the weekend, some 30 to 40 degrees (around 20 Celsius) above average. The warmth also bled west into Finland, which hit 77 degrees (25 Celsius) Saturday, the country’s warmest temperature of the season so far.

Que denial....

 

[flogger]

It was 84 degrees near the Arctic Ocean this weekend as carbon dioxide hit its highest level in human history



Que denial....

So what ? The Arctic has gone through much more dramatic events over recent millenia so why would a 'weekend' matter in the great scheme of things ?

 

[flogger]

How can you believe in global cooling, then you also believe that the "cooling" is so slow that you can have the tenth warmest year on record in 2025?

Especially since all the present ten hottest year on record have all been since 1998.

The 10 Hottest Global Years on Record | Climate Central

Given that natural warming and cooling episodes can last for many centuries why are you pegging the current very modest warming phase on us when nature has obviously had a far greater impact over recent millenia ?

(Kobashi 2011 Arctic ice core real world data)

 

[Bergslagstroll]

2016>2017>2018>. . . .

It is just silly of you talk about cooling then the five hottest year on reord have all been since 2014.

The 10 Hottest Global Years on Record | Climate Central

There 2019 is also on track for being warmer than 2018.

2019 On Track to Be Earth's Third Warmest Year on Record, NOAA Says | The Weather Channel

 

[Bergslagstroll]

Given that natural warming and cooling episodes can last for many centuries why are you pegging the current very modest warming phase on us when nature has obviously had a far greater impact over recent millenia ?

(Kobashi 2011 Arctic ice core real world data)View attachment 67258722

That isn't a correct graph over the last thousand year of global temperature. Also that.

Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.


Global Warming

Here you can read more how the recent warming is manmade and why it mathers to take action.

'"What we see isn’t good – impacts of climate change are in many cases larger in response to a half a degree (of warming) than we’d expected,” said Shindell, who was formerly a research scientist at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City. “We see faster acceleration of ice melting, greater increases in tropical storm damages, stronger effects on droughts and flooding, etc. As we calibrate our models to capture the observed responses or even simply extrapolate another half a degree, we see that it’s more important than we’d previously thought to avoid the extra warming between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius.”'

A Degree of Concern: Why Global Temperatures Matter – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

 

[flogger]

That isn't a correct graph over the last thousand year of global temperature.

This was taken from the Kobashi 2011 peer review study of Greenland ice cores and are real world observations unlike climate modelling which is almost entirely guesswork.

Here is why (click to enlarge list)

C3: The Problem(s) With Climate Models: Top 50 Major Problems Causing All The Model Prediction Failures

Without these useless models there is no 'crisis' ..... period

 

[PoS]

That isn't a correct graph over the last thousand year of global temperature.

How do you know? Were you around for the last thousand years and recording the world's temperature?

 

[Jack Hays]

It is just silly of you talk about cooling then the five hottest year on reord have all been since 2014.

The 10 Hottest Global Years on Record | Climate Central

There 2019 is also on track for being warmer than 2018.

2019 On Track to Be Earth's Third Warmest Year on Record, NOAA Says | The Weather Channel

2016>2017>2018>. . . .

The verdict is not yet in for 2019. Note that the temperature anomaly fell​ from April to May. Even if the El Nino pauses cooling, it will resume in 2020.

UAH Global Temperature Update for May, 2019: +0.32 deg. C

June 3rd, 2019The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for May, 2019 was +0.32 deg. C, down from the April, 2019 value of +0.44 deg. C:

 

[Bergslagstroll]

This was taken from the Kobashi 2011 peer review study of Greenland ice cores and are real world observations unlike climate modelling which is almost entirely guesswork.

Here is why (click to enlarge list)

C3: The Problem(s) With Climate Models: Top 50 Major Problems Causing All The Model Prediction Failures

Without these useless models there is no 'crisis' ..... period

So no link to the study. Also you admitt that it is a local study for Greenland and not about historical global temperature like my link from NASA.

That there are today many ways to collect data both historical and present data.

"Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.

Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming."

Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Also climate models have been pretty accurate.

The First Climate Model Turns 50, And Predicted Global Warming Almost Perfectly

What Are Climate Models and How Accurate Are They?

That at the same time the evidence of the urgent need to reduce C02 emissions are so overwhelming that not only federal agencies under Donald Trump like NASA acknowledge it but also fossil fuel companies like Exxon have to acknowledge the need to dramaticly reduce C02 emissions.

Statements on Paris climate agreement | ExxonMobil

 

[longview]

That isn't a correct graph over the last thousand year of global temperature. Also that.

Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.


Global Warming

Here you can read more how the recent warming is manmade and why it mathers to take action.

'"What we see isn’t good – impacts of climate change are in many cases larger in response to a half a degree (of warming) than we’d expected,” said Shindell, who was formerly a research scientist at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City. “We see faster acceleration of ice melting, greater increases in tropical storm damages, stronger effects on droughts and flooding, etc. As we calibrate our models to capture the observed responses or even simply extrapolate another half a degree, we see that it’s more important than we’d previously thought to avoid the extra warming between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius.”'

A Degree of Concern: Why Global Temperatures Matter – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Yep! that is what the models predict,
IF the CO2 levels follow a track (RCP8.5) which they cannot, and
IF assumptions of CO2 forcing assumptions are correct, and
IF the assumptions of positive feedbacks are as high as assumed.
The reality is that RCP8.5 would be almost impossible.
One of the few actual measurements of CO2 forcing, came in ~30 lower than predicted.
To date there is no empirical evidence the the predicted amplified feedbacks even exists, much less exists
at a level high enough to allow 1.1 C of CO2 forcing to become 3 C or higher of ECS.

 

[Lord of Planar]

So no link to the study. Also you admitt that it is a local study for Greenland and not about historical global temperature like my link from NASA.

That there are today many ways to collect data both historical and present data.

"Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.

Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming."

Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Nobody should take anything in the Climate dot NASA dot gov link serious. Other NASA links are generally very good. Just not the climate dot nasa dot gov. This is a blogger level site, and not edited by experts.

Also climate models have been pretty accurate.

The First Climate Model Turns 50, And Predicted Global Warming Almost Perfectly

Yes, only the old climate models, before the agenda took hold.

What Are Climate Models and How Accurate Are They?

Oh....

Another blog.

Don't you complain about blogs?

Why is this one better?

Is it because it fits your confirmation bias?

have i ever told you how much I hate hypocrisy, as do most other intelligent people?

That at the same time the evidence of the urgent need to reduce C02 emissions are so overwhelming that not only federal agencies under Donald Trump like NASA acknowledge it but also fossil fuel companies like Exxon have to acknowledge the need to dramaticly reduce C02 emissions.

Statements on Paris climate agreement | ExxonMobil

Do you know why Exxon et. al. have agreed with the "climate change" agenda? It's because the predict participation in such endeavors will give them almost unlimited tax breaks, and even subsidies, making a profit from tax payers, rather than paying taxes if they play the game right.

Do you really want to subsidize such large corporations?

 

[longview]

2016>2017>2018>. . . .

The verdict is not yet in for 2019. Note that the temperature anomaly fell​ from April to May. Even if the El Nino pauses cooling, it will resume in 2020.

UAH Global Temperature Update for May, 2019: +0.32 deg. C

June 3rd, 2019The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for May, 2019 was +0.32 deg. C, down from the April, 2019 value of +0.44 deg. C:

I think the El Nino events are a constructive interference pattern, and peak when everything lines up.
We simply do not know all the contributing frequencies yet!

2016 and 1998 were large peaks, with other El Nino years being minor peaks.
This is superimposed on a slight warming trend, which itself could be coming to an end.

 

[Media_Truth]

I think the El Nino events are a constructive interference pattern, and peak when everything lines up.
We simply do not know all the contributing frequencies yet!

2016 and 1998 were large peaks, with other El Nino years being minor peaks.
This is superimposed on a slight warming trend, which itself could be coming to an end.

Yeah, sure. Let us know when those temps get back to the 1980s levels.

 

[longview]

Yeah, sure. Let us know when those temps get back to the 1980s levels.

View attachment 67259264

Why would getting back to 1980's levels be part of the equation I described?
The mentioned superimposed warming is still there!