• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Many Security Deadlines Missed Since 9/11

scottyz

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration has missed dozens of deadlines set by Congress after the Sept. 11 attacks for developing ways to protect airplanes, ships and railways from terrorists.

A plan to defend ships and ports from attack is six months overdue. Rules to protect air cargo from infiltration by terrorists are two months late. A study on the cost of giving anti-terrorism training to federal law enforcement officers who fly commercially was supposed to be done more than three years ago.

"The incompetence that we recently saw with FEMA's leadership appears to exist throughout the
Homeland Security Department," said Mississippi Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (news, bio, voting record), top Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee. "Our nation is still vulnerable."

Congress must share the blame for the department's sluggishness in protecting commerce and travel from terrorists, according to other observers.

Lawmakers piled on deadline after deadline for reports, plans and regulations while the department, created after the 2001 attacks, had to integrate 22 agencies with 170,000 workers and cope with terrorist threats and hurricanes.
"There's a lack of adult leadership on both sides," said James Carafano, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "The department just doesn't have its act together," he said. "Some of these deadlines are unrealistic."

The first response to the Sept. 11 hijackings was to prevent terrorists from taking over airliners with weapons and crashing them into buildings.

It became clear that more needed to be done after suicide bombings of railways in Madrid, Spain, and London, on a tanker near Yemen and on airplanes in Russia.

So Congress set more deadlines for more security measures.

Some were met. Many were not.

A law signed by
President Bush on Nov. 25, 2002, set a July 1, 2004, deadline for ships and ports to tighten security amid fears that terrorists might smuggle nuclear weapons in a cargo container.

The Coast Guard largely accomplished the undertaking. But much still remains undone: A report on how a grant program for shippers and ports would work is more than a year late; a report on cargo container security is eight months overdue; a national security plan for marine transportation is well past its April 1 due date.

Rep. Harold Rogers (news, bio, voting record), chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees Homeland Security spending, was unhappy because the TSA missed a March 17 deadline for a plan to deploy bomb-detection machines at airports.

Rogers, R-Ky., put a provision in the Homeland Security spending bill, signed into law Oct. 18, that withholds $5 million from the department until it submits such a plan.

Some security deadlines have been met, especially those set soon after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Within nine weeks of the hijackings, lawmakers ordered a federal work force to take over airport security, many more air marshals and the creation of the TSA.

Congress set 33 deadlines; a press release went out each time one was met.

One of the biggest deadlines was met with great fanfare when the TSA announced on Nov. 19, 2002, that it had replaced private airport screeners with a government work force.

The next year, then-TSA chief James Loy told Congress they had met "100 percent of the aviation screening mandates."

The TSA does not make those kind of announcements any more.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051030/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/security_deadlines
 

Calm2Chaos

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
3,967
Reaction score
7
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
scottyz said:

We are not allowed to actively and effectively protect and or secure our airlines or railways. What it takes to actually bring minimal safety to these and other mass transit centers is scoffed on and berated. If your not allowed to use your most powerful evidence and proof to protect you, your going to continue to be a walking target. The liberals rallying behind the ACLU are going to make sure that the target on our backs stays squarley in place.
 

gordon

Banned
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
the USA is one of the safest countries in the world yet since the debut of the cold war It has been your own GOVT.
that has instilled the fear in you

starting with DUCK AND COVER
then came DUCT TAPE AND PLASTIC
now there is a color code system
it is ratcheted up and down when ever a diversion is needed
Bush is backed into a corner I expect another anouncement anyday

If bush was serious about protecting the country why in the world is the mexican border wide open
If 2000 iraqians lined up along the border at 1 mile intervals all carrying explosives how many would get through i wonder
it has all been a farce to devide and conquer the American people
if you truely want to be safe tell your govt to stop all covert opps against other countries, respect all of your treaties, and cease all military actions against the civilians of IRAQ.
who knows after that Americans may be able to travel around the world without getting a knife in their back mabe in 1000 years
And some wonder why they hate you
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom