• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Managing Muscovite ("russian") uluss dissolution. Maps , statistic, history

Litwin

Litwin

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
33,607
Reaction score
5,193
Location
GDL/Sweden
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Managing Muscovite ("russian") ulus dissolution. Maps , statistic, history . its clear that liberation for oppressed is near just in 2-3 years
which of these counters have the best chance to succeed?

cfe0d5ade2a69da61067e11846384249.jpg


"Russia’s ongoing attacks on Ukraine and its persistent subversion of Western states demonstrates that Washington and Brussels have failed to restrain Moscow’s imperial ambitions.

Engagement, criticism and limited sanctions have simply reinforced Kremlin perceptions that the West is weak and predictable. To curtail Moscow’s neo-imperialism a new strategy is needed, one that nourishes Russia’s decline and manages the international consequences of its dissolution.

Russia is more fragile than it appears, and the West is stronger than it is portrayed. Under the regime of Vladimir Putin, which will soon enter its third decade, the country has transitioned from an emerging democracy to an unstable authoritarianism.

Although Moscow has failed to modernize its economy to be globally competitive, the Kremlin excels in one domain — disinformation — through which it portrays the country as a rising power on a level with the U.S.

In reality, Russia is a declining state that disguises its internal infirmities with external offensives. Russia’s economy is stagnating. According to World Bank statistics for 2017, Russia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita ranks 62nd in the world.

Even the defense budget is shrinking and barely reaches a tenth of the U.S. Through a combination of low fossil fuel prices, infrastructural decay, pervasive corruption and Western financial sanctions, state revenues are declining, living standards are falling, social conflicts are intensifying and regional disquiet is mounting. "
Managing Russia's dissolution | TheHill
 
According to mathematician Georgiy Malinetsky,[3] there are some possible reasons for the collapse of Russia:

the big difference between the income levels of different social strata;
strong economic gap between different regions of Russia;
the complexity of communications between different regions of the country, which are the result of infrastructure underdevelopment;
breakdown of generations;
strengthening of existing schisms in a religious, cultural and national context;
strengthening of the power of local regional leaders;

Dissolution of Russia - Wikipedia

This topic was actively discussed by E. Kholmogorov, G. Kasparov, M. Leontiev, P. Svyatenkov, K. Remchukov, K. Rodionov, A. Eliseev, I. Prokopenko, G. Gref, M. Kalashnikov, M. Remizov, M. Delyagin, A. Fursov, G. Malinetsky, V. Solovey, S. Kurginyan, A. Prokhanov, N. Narochnitskaya, V. Averyanov, V. Tretyakov, I. Yakovenko, D. Medvedev[1].
 
Your article is from January of 2019.
 
Litwin said:
Managing Muscovite ("russian") ulus dissolution. Maps , statistic, history . its clear that liberation for oppressed is near just in 2-3 years
which of these counters have the best chance to succeed?

cfe0d5ade2a69da61067e11846384249.jpg


"Russia’s ongoing attacks on Ukraine and its persistent subversion of Western states demonstrates that Washington and Brussels have failed to restrain Moscow’s imperial ambitions.

Engagement, criticism and limited sanctions have simply reinforced Kremlin perceptions that the West is weak and predictable. To curtail Moscow’s neo-imperialism a new strategy is needed, one that nourishes Russia’s decline and manages the international consequences of its dissolution.

Russia is more fragile than it appears, and the West is stronger than it is portrayed. Under the regime of Vladimir Putin, which will soon enter its third decade, the country has transitioned from an emerging democracy to an unstable authoritarianism.

Although Moscow has failed to modernize its economy to be globally competitive, the Kremlin excels in one domain — disinformation — through which it portrays the country as a rising power on a level with the U.S.

In reality, Russia is a declining state that disguises its internal infirmities with external offensives. Russia’s economy is stagnating. According to World Bank statistics for 2017, Russia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita ranks 62nd in the world.

Even the defense budget is shrinking and barely reaches a tenth of the U.S. Through a combination of low fossil fuel prices, infrastructural decay, pervasive corruption and Western financial sanctions, state revenues are declining, living standards are falling, social conflicts are intensifying and regional disquiet is mounting. "
Managing Russia's dissolution | TheHill
Click to expand...

There are no "Muscovite Ulus".

Using obsolete terms makes you look rather silly.
 
Litwin said:
what has changed in Muscovy since 1706?
Click to expand...

Well in 1721 the Russian Empire was officially established. It was effectively dissolved in 1917 with the bulk of Russian territory and population falling under the dominion of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which would eventually include the Caucuses, the Baltics, and Central Asia. In 1991 the USSR was dissolved and replaced with the Russian Federation, while the states of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. Among these the Russian Federation is considered the sole legal inheritor of the USSR's legacy and assets.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Well in 1721 the Russian Empire was officially established. It was effectively dissolved in 1917 with the bulk of Russian territory and population falling under the dominion of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which would eventually include the Caucuses, the Baltics, and Central Asia. In 1991 the USSR was dissolved and replaced with the Russian Federation, while the states of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. Among these the Russian Federation is considered the sole legal inheritor of the USSR's legacy and assets.
Click to expand...

no it was not, Muscovy was just 1 of 15 independent states, according Marxist - satanic - atheist " constitution " . thats why many M imperialists hate ussr so much

wrong again, according Maskal "Constitutional Court "

"“Russia doesn’t carry on [the Soviet Union’s legal system] in law, but replaces a state that was once created illegally, requiring it to reckon with the consequences of its activities, including political repression,” Aranovsky wrote.

“This makes succession — with the transfer of the Communist Soviet regime’s commitments to repressive and terrorist acts to Russia — disputable,” he continued.

Judge Aranovsky added that he doesn’t believe that Russia should give up its membership in international bodies. Russia inherited its UN Security Council seat from the U.S.S.R. in 1991."
 
Last edited:
Litwin said:
no it was not, Muscovy was just 1 of 15 independent states, according Marxist - satanic - atheist " constitution " . thats why many M imperialists hate ussr so much

wrong again, according Maskal "Constitutional Court "

"“Russia doesn’t carry on [the Soviet Union’s legal system] in law, but replaces a state that was once created illegally, requiring it to reckon with the consequences of its activities, including political repression,” Aranovsky wrote.

“This makes succession — with the transfer of the Communist Soviet regime’s commitments to repressive and terrorist acts to Russia — disputable,” he continued.

Judge Aranovsky added that he doesn’t believe that Russia should give up its membership in international bodies. Russia inherited its UN Security Council seat from the U.S.S.R. in 1991."
Click to expand...

None of what you posted changes the facts in post #8

Can't Lithuania afford history books?
 
Litwin said:
no it was not, Muscovy was just 1 of 15 independent states, according Marxist - satanic - atheist " constitution " . thats why many M imperialists hate ussr so much
Click to expand...

What?

"“Russia doesn’t carry on [the Soviet Union’s legal system] in law, but replaces a state that was once created illegally, requiring it to reckon with the consequences of its activities, including political repression,” Aranovsky wrote.

“This makes succession — with the transfer of the Communist Soviet regime’s commitments to repressive and terrorist acts to Russia — disputable,” he continued.

Judge Aranovsky added that he doesn’t believe that Russia should give up its membership in international bodies. Russia inherited its UN Security Council seat from the U.S.S.R. in 1991."
Click to expand...

Again, what?
 
Jredbaron96 said:
You're not making any sense.
Click to expand...

read this Russia Should Drop ‘Terrorist’ Soviet Legacy, Judge Says - The Moscow Times

"“Russia doesn’t carry on [the Soviet Union’s legal system] in law, but replaces a state that was once created illegally, requiring it to reckon with the consequences of its activities, including political repression,” Aranovsky wrote.

“This makes succession — with the transfer of the Communist Soviet regime’s commitments to repressive and terrorist acts to Russia — disputable,” he continued.

Judge Aranovsky added that he doesn’t believe that Russia should give up its membership in international bodies. Russia inherited its UN Security Council seat from the U.S.S.R. in 1991."
 
Litwin said:
read this Russia Should Drop ‘Terrorist’ Soviet Legacy, Judge Says - The Moscow Times

"“Russia doesn’t carry on [the Soviet Union’s legal system] in law, but replaces a state that was once created illegally, requiring it to reckon with the consequences of its activities, including political repression,” Aranovsky wrote.

“This makes succession — with the transfer of the Communist Soviet regime’s commitments to repressive and terrorist acts to Russia — disputable,” he continued.

Judge Aranovsky added that he doesn’t believe that Russia should give up its membership in international bodies. Russia inherited its UN Security Council seat from the U.S.S.R. in 1991."
Click to expand...

The opinion of a single judge doesn't really invalidate all of history.
 
Chief researcher, Institute of philosophy RAS V. Shevchenko when evaluating review articles O. Yu. Maslova "the Collapse of Russia in the early XXI century in the statements of contemporaries," notes that it contains a large collection of articles of authors on the theme of disintegration of Russia — from the diehard supporters of the idea that the collapse of Russia is almost inevitable and has already begun to supporters of the idea of artificial and deliberate attempts of the collapse of the country[1].

The main reason for the disintegration processes and the possible collapse of Russia according To V. Shevchenko's review work "the Future of Russia: Strategies for philosophical understanding" is the lack of a national idea or project (such as communism in the USSR) that would unite all the people of Russia. Russian statehood is in a transitional state, in which all processes have become more active: both integration and disintegration[1].

Accompanying reasons for the possible collapse of Russia in the work of V. Shevchenko are listed: xenophobic sentiments ("Russia for Russians"), the desire of the ethnic groups in Russia to separatism, the transformation of national republics into full-fledged States[1].

In a report to the Izborsky club, a group of analysts led by A. Kobyakov named the lines of division in modern Russian society that could potentially lead to the collapse of the state: socio-economic inequality, interethnic relations, alienation of elites from the people, and opposition of the "creative class" to the rest of society[1].

Culturologist I. Yakovenko believes that the main reason for the disintegration processes is the uneven process of market modernization in different regions of Russia, which increases the economic isolation of these regions from each other. Yakovenko identifies the following regions into which, in his opinion, the Russian Federation may break up: North and South of Russia, Siberia, the North Caucasus and the intercontinental border[1].

In V. Shevchenko's article, the opinion is given that the disintegration has actually already begun, and its signs are: legal extraterritoriality, displacement of persons of a non-titular nation in national republics from the state apparatus, and radicalization of Islam[1].
 
Litwin said:
Chief researcher, Institute of philosophy RAS V. Shevchenko when evaluating review articles O. Yu. Maslova "the Collapse of Russia in the early XXI century in the statements of contemporaries," notes that it contains a large collection of articles of authors on the theme of disintegration of Russia — from the diehard supporters of the idea that the collapse of Russia is almost inevitable and has already begun to supporters of the idea of artificial and deliberate attempts of the collapse of the country[1].

The main reason for the disintegration processes and the possible collapse of Russia according To V. Shevchenko's review work "the Future of Russia: Strategies for philosophical understanding" is the lack of a national idea or project (such as communism in the USSR) that would unite all the people of Russia. Russian statehood is in a transitional state, in which all processes have become more active: both integration and disintegration[1].

Accompanying reasons for the possible collapse of Russia in the work of V. Shevchenko are listed: xenophobic sentiments ("Russia for Russians"), the desire of the ethnic groups in Russia to separatism, the transformation of national republics into full-fledged States[1].

In a report to the Izborsky club, a group of analysts led by A. Kobyakov named the lines of division in modern Russian society that could potentially lead to the collapse of the state: socio-economic inequality, interethnic relations, alienation of elites from the people, and opposition of the "creative class" to the rest of society[1].

Culturologist I. Yakovenko believes that the main reason for the disintegration processes is the uneven process of market modernization in different regions of Russia, which increases the economic isolation of these regions from each other. Yakovenko identifies the following regions into which, in his opinion, the Russian Federation may break up: North and South of Russia, Siberia, the North Caucasus and the intercontinental border[1].

In V. Shevchenko's article, the opinion is given that the disintegration has actually already begun, and its signs are: legal extraterritoriality, displacement of persons of a non-titular nation in national republics from the state apparatus, and radicalization of Islam[1].
Click to expand...

He is speaking of RUSSIA.

Not your mythical Muscovite Ulus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom