- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 45,404
- Reaction score
- 11,746
- Location
- Olympia Wa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-...-justice-department-over-russia-probe-n834431WASHINGTON — Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort filed a lawsuit against Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the U.S. Justice Department in federal court on Wednesday, arguing that the federal probe that charged him is operating outside the law.
.
.
.
Manafort's lawsuit claimed that Mueller should not have scrutinized his lobbying work and tax filings in 2014 in connection to a probe into the 2016 election. The lawsuit also reveals that Manafort voluntarily met with Justice Department prosecutors and FBI agents in 2014 to discuss his overseas lobbying work.
The court filing asks that a federal judge place an injunction on Rosenstein, Mueller and the Justice Department to restrict them from performing their duties.
So he met with the FBI and Justice Department then, they gave him the OK, and then decided to turn around and prosecute him. Reminds me of when Jeff Sessions got advice from the FBI about how to disclose his meetings with Russians, they advised him that he didn't have to disclose, and then they retroactively leaked info so that he'd recuse himself.The lawsuit also reveals that Manafort voluntarily met with Justice Department prosecutors and FBI agents in 2014 to discuss his overseas lobbying work.
So he met with the FBI and Justice Department then, they gave him the OK, and then decided to turn around and prosecute him. Reminds me of when Jeff Sessions got advice from the FBI about how to disclose his meetings with Russians, they advised him that he didn't have to disclose, and then they retroactively leaked info so that he'd recuse himself.
That's quite hyperbolic...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-...-justice-department-over-russia-probe-n834431
He should be right, and he might find a judge to rule in his favor, but the work of THE HATCHET MAN (My term for Mueller..which I claim is the real job he was hired to do)) will not be impeded by those lower judges I spect, and I cant imagine SCOTUS getting in his way now that they are primarily a political body rather than a legal body.
Not that far off target?!
Your statement looked hyperbolic to me.'That's quite hyperbolic...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-...-justice-department-over-russia-probe-n834431
He should be right, and he might find a judge to rule in his favor, but the work of THE HATCHET MAN (My term for Mueller..which I claim is the real job he was hired to do)) will not be impeded by those lower judges I spect, and I cant imagine SCOTUS getting in his way now that they are primarily a political body rather than a legal body.
People have said muller was going outside the scope of his investigation and so do a lot of other people.
And all of those people are idiots.
The guy got caught violating a slew of laws, and now his defense is the body that investigated him doesn't have the authority to do so. Good luck with that argument, I guess, but it's hard to imagine how Mueller could look into ties between senior members of the campaign with Russia, Russia collusion, etc. without, as step 1 or 2 of 100 or more, following the money trail, and that trail led straight to the crimes he's charged with. It's not like he's been charged with cavorting with prostitutes or having consensual sex with an underling or something, but having large and very significant financial ties with the country that allegedly tried to influence our election.
If anything, looks like he's trying to build a case for a possible Trump pardon, by spreading the idea in public than his prosecution is somehow illegitimate. It might work with Trump lemmings, but not with anyone else I suspect.
Publicity stunt.
Quite a few of them are law makers.
The guy got caught violating a slew of laws, and now his defense is the body that investigated him doesn't have the authority to do so. Good luck with that argument, I guess, but it's hard to imagine how Mueller could look into ties between senior members of the campaign with Russia, Russia collusion, etc. without, as step 1 or 2 of 100 or more, following the money trail, and that trail led straight to the crimes he's charged with. It's not like he's been charged with cavorting with prostitutes or having consensual sex with an underling or something, but having large and very significant financial ties with the country that allegedly tried to influence our election.
If anything, looks like he's trying to build a case for a possible Trump pardon, by spreading the idea in public than his prosecution is somehow illegitimate. It might work with Trump lemmings, but not with anyone else I suspect.
Last act of a very,very desperate man. He must no longer be relying on being part of a mass pardon package.
And those law makers are idiots.
Not really. There is nothing there.
Mueller?s probe doesn't end with a bang, but with a whimper | TheHill
It has been a year and nothing has been found.
ThIs poor attempt to unseat a duly elected president has to stop.
The FBI is already embarrassed enough over the new findings of the clinton emails.
They really should stop while they have some credibility left.
That's quite hyperbolic...
Quite a few of them are law makers.
Mueller?s probe doesn't end with a bang, but with a whimper | TheHill
So are you abandoning the argument that Mueller is operating outside the law?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?