• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Majority of Americans want Biden to consider 'all possible nominees' for Supreme Court vacancy: POLL

tacomancer said:
@Schism tends to have a certain style which is low on logic or supportive arguments and high on rhetoric and evocative emotional language. If you just ignore the rhetoric and emotion, he at best just gets repetitive due to his lack of logical foundation keeping him from pivoting to better arguments.

He seems quite proud of this. At some point he might start deepening his skills but I suspect it will take a while.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one who is claiming that diversity involves favoritism, and that favoritism is not a part of discrimination.
 
Schism said:
I'm not the one who is claiming that diversity involves favoritism, and that favoritism is not a part of discrimination.
Click to expand...
Actually you are making that claim and them are trying to saddle me with it.

My argument is that Biden’s stance is increasing diversity which is good for America. I never once discussed diversity except to refute your attempts to saddle me with your reasoning.

Are you starting to confuse yourself?
 
TurtleDude said:
Prometeus called Trump's appointees "assholes". I proved it in the post above.
Click to expand...
all you did is prove how biased and dishonest your triggered post was by posting meltdowns like GRRRRRR hate America GRRRRRRRRR hate capitalism GRRRR hate gun rights LMAO

It makes it even more funny your posts deny it and dont even see it
wow this is awesome!!!! I love it
quick post again!

😂🍿
 
TurtleDude said:
your stupid posts are among the most hysterically childish on this board.
Click to expand...
See proven right again!!! hahahahahahahahaha
man this is so great!!!!
you have to love what this is doing to the usual suspects!
:ROFLMAO:🍿
 
AGENT J said:
YES!!! another unhinged triggered dishonest thread on this topic!!!!!
man this really has the usual suspect posting delusional meltdowns all over the place, I love it! LMAO
"Potus" isn't "hiring" anybody and theres no factual EEOC guidelines that are not being followed on this topic of the president nominating a candidate that he feels is qualified and the senate confirming or not
/topically uneducated, tinfoil hat false narrative, dishonest retarded claims in OP destroyed😂

also might as well bring over the other false claims from the two other hilarious thread since none of the nutters can ever answer them

What factual laws have been broken by the president on this issue?
what factual rights have been denied by the president on this issue?
what factually illegal acts have been done by the president of this issue?
what has the president done to make him factually racist and sexist on this issue?
what factually illegal discrimination has the president committed on this issue??
who has the president hired in this case that is factually not qualified, competent, and experienced???

Let us know!
:coffee:
Click to expand...
OUTSTANDING POST...
One of the finest I have seen on this forum...
Thank you very much Agent J... TheLOW
-Peace
 
tacomancer said:
Actually you are making that claim and them are trying to saddle me with it.

My argument is that Biden’s stance is increasing diversity which is good for America. I never once discussed diversity except to refute your attempts to saddle me with your reasoning.

Are you starting to confuse yourself?
Click to expand...
Left wing diversity

A black female who wants more government control
A gay white man who wants more government control
A latino gender fluid individual who wants more government control
an Asian woman who wants more government control
people who look different but all think the same
 
TurtleDude said:
Left wing diversity

A black female who wants more government control
A gay white man who wants more government control
A latino gender fluid individual who wants more government control
an Asian woman who wants more government control
people who look different but all think the same
Click to expand...
Sucks from your perspective I guess.
 
AGENT J said:
all you did is prove how biased and dishonest your triggered post was by posting meltdowns like GRRRRRR hate America GRRRRRRRRR hate capitalism GRRRR hate gun rights LMAO

It makes it even more funny your posts deny it and dont even see it
wow this is awesome!!!! I love it
quick post again!

😂🍿
Click to expand...
more dishonest childish bullshit. Everyone can see how off the rails your idiotic rants are
 
tacomancer said:
Actually you are making that claim and them are trying to saddle me with it.
Click to expand...

Nope, here is your quote:

tacomancer said:
Favoritism isn’t happening. Correcting past favoritism is what is happening and that is done by adding diversity which is increasing variety.
Click to expand...

Diversity is a good thing when it happens naturally and organically.

Not because to limit the pool of candidates to one single skin color/gender.

This is discrimination. It would also be true if POTUS said he's looking for a white male, to which you would be screaming "racism; discrimination!" and rightly so.
 
tacomancer said:
Sucks from your perspective I guess.
Click to expand...
Not at all, it helps my side in the long run. Biden is admitting that qualifications take a back seat to his pandering to certain constituencies
 
HangLow said:
OUTSTANDING POST...
One of the finest I have seen on this forum...
Thank you very much Agent J... TheLOW
-Peace
Click to expand...

careful . . . . the few here that make the Qanon, bigoted, and or spoonfeed false narratives type posts won't like you showing appreciation for facts and reality!
 
Schism said:
Nope, here is your quote:



Diversity is a good thing when it happens naturally and organically.

Not because to limit the pool of candidates to one single skin color/gender.

This is discrimination. It would also be true if POTUS said he's looking for a white male, to which you would be screaming "racism; discrimination!" and rightly so.
Click to expand...
Exactly, my quote supports my claim if not mischaracterizing or trying to saddle me with claims of discrimination. Thank you for proving my point.
 
TurtleDude said:
Not at all, it helps my side in the long run. Biden is admitting that qualifications take a back seat to his pandering to certain constituencies
Click to expand...
Good luck with that. People will forget this in 3 months
 
TurtleDude said:
more dishonest childish bullshit. Everyone can see how off the rails your idiotic rants are
Click to expand...
<Reads post>
<looks at author>
Sayj5RG.gif


proven right again!!
i love how facts make them post so angry, dishonest and triggered LMAO
😁🍿
 
Schism said:
Majority of Americans want Biden to consider 'all possible nominees' for Supreme Court vacancy: POLL


I would agree. I have no problem if Biden chooses a black woman for the post. But he needs to makes sure that choice is made from a pool of all available candidates regardless of skin color, ethnicity, or gender.

If the POTUS doesn't follow EEOC hiring guidelines, why should corporate America? How could a supreme court justice rule on an EEOC Discrimination suit if that justice was hired from a pool of other black females with no other choices considered outside of that demographic?

It just seems odd to me that democrats, liberals or moderates could support this. I would expect progressives and alt-left nutters to support.
Click to expand...
In 2016, the majority of Americans wanted Obama's nominee to get a hearing:

In an ABC News/Washington Post poll last week, Americans by 63 to 32 percent said the president’s nominee should get a hearing.

abcnews.go.com

ANALYSIS: What President Obama's Supreme Court Nomination Means for the 2016 Race

Obama's nomination is destined to become yet another issue in the 2016 race.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

Basically every poll on the subject in 2016 backed this.

How did that turn out?
 
tacomancer said:
Exactly, my quote supports my claim if not mischaracterizing or trying to saddle me with claims of discrimination. Thank you for proving my point.
Click to expand...

But you DO support discrimination if you support Biden choosing a SCJ from only a pool of black female candidates while excluding all the skin colors, genders, ethnicities.
 
Schism said:
But you DO support discrimination if you support Biden choosing a SCJ from only a pool of black female candidates while excluding all the skin colors, genders, ethnicities.
Click to expand...
Incorrect, I already pointed out that increasing diversity is the opposite of discrimination a couple of pages back.
 
it's just me said:
Yeah, who cares about qualifications?
Click to expand...
who said that?
oh wait nobody relevant to this topic . . . . . .another moronic sinful lie bites the dust again LMAO
:ROFLMAO:🍿
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom