Link
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Major Israeli settlement 'unlawful'
Quote from article:
"The issue is that the Arabs don't want the Jews here," she says, over cups of English tea.
She says it is immaterial how much land is offered as part of a potential peace deal; she cites the failure of the talks at Camp David at the end of the Clinton presidency.
The Arabs, she says, are not after a particular area of territory. "That's not what they want. They want us out."
And therein lies the rub, how can peace ever be established between Palestine and Israel?
Link
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Major Israeli settlement 'unlawful'
Quote from article:
"The issue is that the Arabs don't want the Jews here," she says, over cups of English tea.
She says it is immaterial how much land is offered as part of a potential peace deal; she cites the failure of the talks at Camp David at the end of the Clinton presidency.
The Arabs, she says, are not after a particular area of territory. "That's not what they want. They want us out."
And therein lies the rub, how can peace ever be established between Palestine and Israel?
While the Palestinians are being brainwashed by Hamas and its propaganda arm ... there will be no peace.
Hamas and its supporters, followers, and sympathizers need to be squashed.
Once the terrorist wing of Palestine is gone --- a generation free of islam-o-indoctrination can flourish. Then the disease of perverted Islam will begin to clear up.
Withdraw that support and let them duke it out.
Withdraw that support and let them duke it out
Anyne bother to look to see who declared the settlements 'unlawful'?
Israeli settlements on occupied territory are seen as illegal by the rest of the world. But now an Israeli human rights group is saying that even under Israeli law, one of the most significant and well-established settlements is unlawful.
The human rights group B'tselem has published a report in which it states that almost 60% of the settlement of Ofra has been built on land which remains in private Palestinian ownership
Israeli settlements on occupied territory are seen as illegal by the rest of the world
Lets see...Why side with one party when they both hate each other dearly?
Link
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Major Israeli settlement 'unlawful'
Quote from article:
"The issue is that the Arabs don't want the Jews here," she says, over cups of English tea.
She says it is immaterial how much land is offered as part of a potential peace deal; she cites the failure of the talks at Camp David at the end of the Clinton presidency.
The Arabs, she says, are not after a particular area of territory. "That's not what they want. They want us out."
Judy Kramer moved here in 1990 from England, with her husband and five children.
She has seen the settlement grow hugely. And she believes that all this land belongs to the Jewish people.
Both sides are terrorist States.
Then perhaps you should refrain from offering opinions that involve the deaths of millions?. . . I could care less at this point. . .
Both sides are terrorist States. The only reason why Israel has any clout is because of its U.S. support. Withdraw that support and let them duke it out. I could care less at this point. The region has devolved into savagery on both sides. Both sides are fraught with dishonest politicians who never keep their promises regarding peace, both sides are engaging in tactics that are illegal under international law (except no one can table a bill against Israel at the UN because the U.S. will veto it instantly), and both sides don't understand the meaning of compromise.
Why side with one party when they both hate each other dearly?
Laila said:Thats unfair on Palestinians so EU and world should arm and train Palestinians and then let them duke it out.
Oh, and by the way...
If it illegal to keep and then 'occupy' land you won in wartime -- where are the cries to liberate East Prussia from its Polish occupiers?
Lets see...
One side is an open, liberal, Western democracy, and the other side wants to destroy that open, liberal, Western democracy because it has the audacity to exist.
Seems pretty clear to me.
Says who?pure fantasy.
Because a treaty is required to transfer territory from one state to another. There was a treaty transferring East Prussia from Germany to Poland. There was no such treaty transferring Egyptian and Jordanian territory to Israel.
It is a violation of International Law to hold on to land taken in a war. Even the Israeli Supreme Court refer's to this land as "occupied territory".That land ... which was originally jewish property anyway, was technically under BRITISH CONTROL when it was given to them.
Any land taken after that in the 6 days War (which the Arabs started) is considered the spoils of war.
Israel was forced to defend herself from multiple attackers. Those attackers pulled out of ther areas in question during that conflict and therefore THEY ABANDONED THE LAND.
Learn to accept the fact that the land there DOES NOT belong to those countries anymore.
If not for a war started by the Egyptians and Jordanians, the ownership of that land would be IRRELEVANT.
Thanks.
I could not disagree more strongly. Israel, like any other sovereign state, has a right of self-defense. So long as it is being attacked by rockets, it has the same right enjoyed by every other sovereign state to defend itself against those responsible for the attacks on its civilian population e.g., Hamas. Self-defense is not the same thing as terrorism.
Lets see...
One side is an open, liberal, Western democracy, and the other side wants to destroy that open, liberal, Western democracy because it has the audacity to exist.
Seems pretty clear to me.
It is ironic that there are a flow of bills constantly against Israel made in the UN but nary a peep about Palestine, even when they engage in tactics and methods that are directly contrary to the very conventions which are created and enforced in the UN.
Israel on the other hand has made HUGE concessions in the past with land and property to the point of removing their own people at gunpoint. And yet you see no such concessions from the Palestine state other than cease fires (which aren't enforced). Instead of trying to make deals with Israel that would be profitable for their own people and economy they suicide bomb disco's. Even Palestine's neighbor states are fed up with their extremist crap. Its no secret why Egypt and Jordan closed their borders with actual 15ft metal and concrete barriers (which Hamas blew up) to Palestine when they feared that many would try to immigrate over.
That land ... which was originally jewish property anyway, was technically under BRITISH CONTROL when it was given to them.
Any land taken after that in the 6 days War (which the Arabs started) is considered the spoils of war.
Israel was forced to defend herself from multiple attackers. Those attackers pulled out of ther areas in question during that conflict and therefore THEY ABANDONED THE LAND.
Learn to accept the fact that the land there DOES NOT belong to those countries anymore.
If not for a war started by the Egyptians and Jordanians, the ownership of that land would be IRRELEVANT.
Thanks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?