• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

MAGA, the new "N" word for the democrats

Lest we forget the false accusation Trump made about Obama in 2012. By the way, did Donnie Boy find the real birth certificate yet?
🤭

Politics is one thing, what Obama/Biden did was treason.
 
How does that happen when the current president sees half of the population as the "enemy within"?

All the Democrat party has to do is cease the obstruction and work with President Trump.....that's all.
 
This is just bullshit.

Your side uses "woke" as a slur. Given that your side is responsible for the hate groups in the county, your side has no room to talk.

Lol, wut?
 
I have loved watching the "bitching" threads on DP since Trump won in November. It's been a Bitchfest of all Bitchfest's, lol. Delusional minds wholly focused on the hatred of one man is the epitome of seeing man purses full of Kleenex.....it's hilarious.
I'm glad you think so. I had just as much fun at the endless whinging by the MAGAverse over the last 4 years. I give the MAGAverse credit for commercializing their whinge-fest, because at least some folks made some money off the "Let's Go Brandon" merch. Those complaining about Trump just don't have that same instinct to capitalize off their whingers in the same way.

What is particularly hilarious to me in Trump's second go around is witnessing what the first administration should have been like. We complained about things back then not knowing that if he returned he would unleash so much idiocy it would make his first term look functional. The added trolling of political opponents is a nice touch though; it's great to see our tax payer dollars are funding internet trolls working in the administration.
 
The "n" word was applied to a born characteristic, skin color.

MAGA is applied based on words, beliefs, actions. Based on those things, MAGA is worthy of the belittling.

And unlike skin color...MAGA could try to change and do better.

Failed attempt at justifying bigotry.
 
Politics is one thing, what Obama/Biden did was treason.
Odd that none of them have been charged with anything. I look forward to the charges, though I hope the administration will have more competent attorneys than Pirro or their indictments will die with a grand jury.
 
Is this one of those things where I need to wear a red hat to get an M-word pass? What if I say MAGA without a hard-r at the end? How about if I only say MAGA when I'm singing rap songs at the karaoke bar? 😁

They also laughed at the "N" word.
 
It’s awful when people use a derogatory word to denigrate their political opponents, isn’t it?

What's an acronym which describes the Democrats?
 
Liberals are constantly coming up with new words or phrases. Remember when "racist" actually had meaning? Now they've had to move on to "priviledge", "white supremacist", and my favorite: "colonizer". Their attempts become more desperate. Now the're stuck on "fascist" and "nazi". Soon, there will be others as people just simply tune them out.

Gossipers have a short attention span.
 
Presidents and presidential nominees of late say terrible things about the other party or the nominee of the other party. We could find pages of examples and Clinton, Biden, Walz, and Harris would fill plenty of those pages!

The last week of the presidential campaign, and hoping to win it, the Harris/Walz campaign really revved up their froth especially against Trump's base. Posts on X also suggest the campaign broadly labeled Trump and his supporters as threats to democracy, with accusations of equating them to "Hitler" and "Nazis."
And Walz hasn't stopped.
 
I've actually heard justification on the "deplorables" remark such as "well maybe not quite 1/2" :rolleyes: . Hillary was the original TDS
Remind me when Clinton used "deplorables" in her campaign the same way Trump has with his "Radical left" and "enemy within" comments? She made this comment in one speech, while Trump ran with those descriptions throughout his campaign. I thought Clinton's description was daft back then even though she was making it about a subset of the Trump base. Trump has had no such filter.
 
The last week of the presidential campaign, and hoping to win it, the Harris/Walz campaign really revved up their froth especially against Trump's base. Posts on X also suggest the campaign broadly labeled Trump and his supporters as threats to democracy, with accusations of equating them to "Hitler" and "Nazis."
And Walz hasn't stopped.

Would you consider people who don't accept election results, and stage a violent protest to disrupt the certification of the election not a threat to democracy?
🤭
 
When it comes to putting down the other party and the full group of supporters of the other party, I'd argue Trump has been tame in comparison to the Dems. I also think we see evidence of that in election outcomes. Trump gained a significant, even surprising, percentage of groups voters who very traditionally and regularly vote Dem. That's not because Trump demeaned them, told them they were stupid, or told them their ethics and values were bad or missing because they had been voting Dem. He didn't put them down and criticize them in order to win their votes. He welcomed them.
The party of "**** your feelings" pretending they've been angels the whole time, Trump didn't offer to pay legal fees for folk who assured dissenters, didn't try to force campaign buses of the road, etc.?

There's no point trying to lie about it now, MAGA has been dividing since the start.
 
Right, but they are in the civilized world.
Are you *sure* you'd want to make ideologies a protected class? Something tells me the effect wouldn't be quite what you'd want.
 
Back
Top Bottom