• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lynn's Raytheon cash ties run deep

RightinNYC

Girthless
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
25,893
Reaction score
12,484
Location
New York, NY
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Lynn's Raytheon cash ties run deep - Kenneth P. Vogel - Politico.com


This is a pretty identical situation to that of Cheney - he had Halliburton stock options that vested after he was already in office, and had received several payouts before then. The only difference is that all of Cheney's stock was in a blind trust, and he donated it all to charity. I'm curious to see whether Lynn is accused of being a tool for Raytheon for the next 4 years.
 
Not surprising in the slightest. If a big enough stink isn't raised by Obama's political opponents (who, by the way, partake in the same kind of actions), then he'll be accepted.
 
Not surprising in the slightest. If a big enough stink isn't raised by Obama's political opponents (who, by the way, partake in the same kind of actions), then he'll be accepted.

I'm still waiting for the stink to be raised by Obama's political supporters.
 
From what I can tell this appoinment doesn't violate the rules:

 
I'm still waiting for the stink to be raised by Obama's political supporters.

Some will oppose the move and others will rationalize it.

From what I can tell this appoinment doesn't violate the rules:

"working on issues they previously were involved with". Raytheon is a defense contractor. The Pentagon has contracts with Raytheon. Lynn was lobbying for Raytheon.

EDIT:

White House

This is what is blatantly violated, which is why they are trying to seek an exception for him.
 
Last edited:


I still don't see the violation but I do think it will happen. I don't think it is the wisest choice in appointments either.
 
Last edited:
I still don't see the violation but I do think it will happen. I don't think it is the wisest choice in appointments either.

How on earth can you not see it?

1. Lynn was a Raytheon lobbyist.
2. The Department of Defense has contracts with Raytheon.
3. The deputy secretary of defense has the ability to:

4. That is a direct violation of the aforementioned executive order.

Of course, I could also argue that since the DoD is a past client of Raytheon, Lynn would be violating the order by "participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my... former clients."
 


I think it will be violated. Just appointing him is not a violation though. If he never has contact with Raytheon there will be no violation. That is not going to happen though.
 
Who cares if the appointment violates the EO or not? The EO can modified any time he wants to modify it.

The real issue is Obama abandoning a core political principle, i.e., bringing change to Washington by appointing new players and rooting out sorporate lobbyists.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…