- Joined
- May 6, 2020
- Messages
- 8,444
- Reaction score
- 1,488
- Location
- San Luis Obispo, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Never Trumper Frank Luntz conducted a focus group of undecided voters, who watched the debate jointly last night.
8 undecided voters indicated they would now vote for Trump, after watching the debate, and only 1 indicated he/she would vote for Biden.
Among the adjectives used to describe Biden's performance last night were the words "drunk" and "senile". Whereas many participants thought Trump was "presidential" and "poised."
The focus group members are all from different states.Good for them, a trump coalition. Are the 8 from the same state or are the 8 votes going to be split up across America?
The focus group members are all from different states.
We need to wait a couple days for more data. In terms of which candidate benefited from the debate.
Karl Rove, for what it's worth, believes that the debate may catapult Trump to victory.
Luntz has frequently contributed to Fox News as a commentator and analyst, as well as running focus groups during and after presidential debates on CBSN.[3] Luntz describes his specialty as "testing language and finding words that will help his clients sell their product or turn public opinion on an issue or a candidate."[4] He is also an author of business books dealing with communication strategies and public opinion.
2010 "Lie of the Year" award[edit]
Frank Luntz, not exactly one of my 'Go To Guys" when it comes to political consultation.Luntz was awarded the 2010 PolitiFact Lie of the Year award for his promotion of the phrase 'government takeover' to refer to healthcare reform, starting in the spring of 2009. "'Takeovers are like coups,' Luntz wrote in a 28-page memo. 'They both lead to dictators and a loss of freedom.'"[48] In an editorial response, the Wall Street Journal wrote that "PolitiFact's decree is part of a larger journalistic trend that seeks to recast all political debates as matters of lies, misinformation and 'facts,' rather than differences of world view or principles." The editors of PolitiFact announced "We have concluded it is inaccurate to call the plan a government takeover."[49]
Leaked tape from the University of Pennsylvania[edit]
On April 25, 2013, The American Spectator, a conservative news outlet, published a scathing article about Luntz entitled "The Problematic Frank Luntz's Stockholm Syndrome".
In fact, what Luntz has done is simply reveal the kind of thinking that goes on in the minds of too many on the right who, whether they realize it or not, have been intellectually and culturally bullied that there is some sort of 'right way'—'right' as in 'correct'—to think. Resulting in some conservatives who suffer from what might be called a political version of Stockholm Syndrome—where the captives identify with their captors.
Frank Luntz’s opinions are irrelevant.
Frank Luntz, not exactly one of my 'Go To Guys" when it comes to political consultation.
Karl Rove, for what it's worth, believes that the debate may catapult Trump to victory.
I mean, you all seem to worship Nate Silver, who gave Trump a 28% chance of winning in 2016, so anything is possible here.Karl Rove. Wasn't he the guy who went nuts on Fox on election night, 2012 because he just KNEW that Romney had won?
Yeah. That was him.
Luntz was funded by Les Wexner, the same dark villain who funded Jeffrey Epstein's sex ring. Wexner and Luntz are die-hard Zionists- that is the only political issue they appear to care about. Luntz' appearance as a never-Trumper was probably his attempt at gaining relevancy again. He's tied into the Epstein affair via Wexner, and should probably be investigated himself.
Frank Luntz, not exactly one of my 'Go To Guys" when it comes to political consultation.
Frank Luntz was not one of the focus group members.Luntz was funded by Les Wexner, the same dark villain who funded Jeffrey Epstein's sex ring. Wexner and Luntz are die-hard Zionists- that is the only political issue they appear to care about. Luntz' appearance as a never-Trumper was probably his attempt at gaining relevancy again. He's tied into the Epstein affair via Wexner, and should probably be investigated himself.
Yeah, okay, double down on making your point even less relevant by referencing a Fox News focus group conducted by Laura Ingraham and Raymond Arroyo.Frank Luntz’s opinions are irrelevant.
The opinions of the focus group participants are relevant.
And Luntz seemed a bit rattled by the fact that Biden performed so poorly with the focus group.
A Fox News focus group conducted by Laura Ingraham and Raymond Arroyo arrived at similar results. 2 undecideds in their group said the debate convinced them to vote for Biden, 7 or 8 said the debate convinced them to vote for Trump.
– Laura Ingraham, 2018 CPAC Address“Liberals are kind of like herpes. Just when you think you have it beat, they come back again. There’s no cure. You can only keep it at bay.”
I mean, you all seem to worship Nate Silver, who gave Trump a 28% chance of winning in 2016, so anything is possible here.
The jokes started when you all released a CNN poll of viewers' reactions to the debate.Yeah, okay, double down on making your point even less relevant by referencing a Fox News focus group conducted by Laura Ingraham and Raymond Arroyo.
Ho ho ho, ha ha ha.... keep the jokes coming!
Luntz is a crypto Trump shill. That's my take. Someone who worked on Les Wexner's propaganda campaigns to lie to Americans about circumstances that resulted in a war is not someone who I care to listen to. He should be in prison for treason along with about several hundred others.Frank Luntz was not one of the focus group members.
Their opinions are not his. He seemed irritated by their criticisms of Biden.
And seemed even more irritated when two focus group members referred to Biden as "drunk" and "senile".
The almighty 538 predicted Hillary would win lol.The Covid could not be heading for its third peak at a worse time for Trump and all his lickspittle Republican partners in crime.
All bow before the almighty 538, who no less a reliable source than RuebenSherr claims we all worship:
View attachment 67301065
The almighty 538 predicted Hillary would win lol.
I also notice that you seem glad that the Covid numbers are going up. Which is disturbing. No offense.
We’ve got Robert Cahaly of Trafalgar, who predicted 2016 spot on, predicting another Trump win.The almighty 538 predicted that Clinton had a 72% chance of winning. There's a difference.
And 2020 isn't 2016.
lol
Only 2 of the dozen members of the Fox focus group held Trump responsible for a single death.None taken, since we both know it is Trump who is responsible for tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths, not me.
/// not even liberals truly believe it. /// <---- You just lost the argument unless you can validate this unproven positive claim.Only 2 of the dozen members of the Fox focus group held Trump responsible for a single death.
This is a liberal talking point, not even liberals truly believe it. They are using this tragedy for political gain.
Only 2 of the dozen members of the Fox focus group held Trump responsible for a single death
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?