• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Lord" Representative Charles Boustany

Perhaps because your style is partisan in nature. Seriously, what does anything that you posted show? what is it supposed to mean exactly?

Partisan in nature? Didn't know the republicans owned conservatism exclusively and democrats liberal exclusively. Now this is a false assumption by many. Both parties have their centrists and moderates so now how exactly does posting information as I see news that comes up in the news cycle? Again its a failure of an assumption to think an ideology belongs to one party or the other.

If you're thinking partisan look at Rev or Apbst if you want the other side look at the actual liberals on this forum. Thus far Rev has asked me to condemn the unions and I did for their activity at the town halls throwing people out and going to a meeting where they arent from the district. I condemned the democrats for booing bush at the state of the union. Now rev doesn't condemn both sides I actually have. So if he wants to continue pushing his opinion and not debate the topic he should announce it instead of just coming in every topic I'm in to try to personal attack me based on his own opinion.
 
Better idea, how about you post your actual ideas and what not, so we don't mistake you for an activist Liberal, that your current posts, and past obamablogging clearly shows you as.... :2wave:

You still haven't shown my views since you seem to claim I'm a "liberal". Then again if being as far to the right as you come across then anything I guess is liberal to you.
 
Partisan in nature? Didn't know the republicans owned conservatism exclusively and democrats liberal exclusively. Now this is a false assumption by many. Both parties have their centrists and moderates so now how exactly does posting information as I see news that comes up in the news cycle? Again its a failure of an assumption to think an ideology belongs to one party or the other.

If you're thinking partisan look at Rev or Apbst if you want the other side look at the actual liberals on this forum. Thus far Rev has asked me to condemn the unions and I did for their activity at the town halls throwing people out and going to a meeting where they arent from the district. I condemned the democrats for booing bush at the state of the union. Now rev doesn't condemn both sides I actually have. So if he wants to continue pushing his opinion and not debate the topic he should announce it instead of just coming in every topic I'm in to try to personal attack me based on his own opinion.


So look to liberals to see who is non partisan... :lol: Classic....
 
You still haven't shown my views since you seem to claim I'm a "liberal". Then again if being as far to the right as you come across then anything I guess is liberal to you.




You're right, my bad, it's often centrists start inane topics like this about right wingers, threads about people in wheel chairs getting yelled at by town hall protestors, and blog on Obama's activism website.... :roll:
 
You're right, my bad, it's often centrists start inane topics like this about right wingers, threads about people in wheel chairs getting yelled at by town hall protestors, and blog on Obama's activism website.... :roll:

Right wingers? Actually republicans you make the assumption all republicans must be conservatives. A woman getting yelled at in a town hall meeting isn't a partisan issue. Again you seem not to know the difference in ideologies. Where are my social and economic positions to determine my ideology Rev? You're basing this on your opinion. Debate the topic?
 
Right wingers? Actually republicans you make the assumption all republicans must be conservatives. A woman getting yelled at in a town hall meeting isn't a partisan issue. Again you seem not to know the difference in ideologies. Where are my social and economic positions to determine my ideology Rev? You're basing this on your opinion. Debate the topic?


You tell me, all we have to go by is your rabid attacks on republicans, and tea party peoples, and your obama blog...


3 for you being a raging lefty.....
 
Alright rev I got an idea why don't you tell me where I stand on social and economic issues since you seem to know so much about the various labels that apply to people. Here's your chance. Either that or stop trolling and debate the actual topic




This is not something I would do, I simply go by your posts, and your obama blogging to note, that in my and most peoples opinion I venture to guess, you sir, are no "centrist"
 
Only if it concerns state law. Doctors are sued on a federal level all the time, therefore it would only make sense to have tort reform on a federal level.

I am not necessarily buying that. Years ago I worked for a large plaintiffs law firm and all the medical malpractice cases they ever were involved in were at the state level.

Even the Heritage Institute said the same thing:

Since the problems of medical malpractice are problems of state law, solutions must rest ultimately in changes in state law. The states remain the best laboratories for tort reform, particularly for medical malpractice claims that involve parties only from within a given state. Congress should strongly encourage states to reform their destructive medical malpractice system in ways that are consistent with the constitutional principle of federalism.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/wm502.cfm
 
Last edited:
You tell me, all we have to go by is your rabid attacks on republicans, and tea party peoples, and your obama blog...


3 for you being a raging lefty.....

Raging lefty? So posting about Mark Foley being on the radio makes me a lefty... um okay. Me pulling up information on Boustany somehow makes me a lefty. Yeah you make sense. Attacks on tea party peoples? Wait didn't the right claim not all tea party people are righties? But moderates, democrats, etc. So are you saying all tea party people are righties?

There's nothing rabid about the discussion except with what you're doing. Again regarding the New Jersey town hall you keep leaving out the bit where my complaint was that they were attacking people who were even on their own side because they sounded intellectual you keep skipping over that part. You know the part where they had no idea who they were even shouting down.

Are you going to debate the topic or continue flaming?
 
This is not something I would do, I simply go by your posts, and your obama blogging to note, that in my and most peoples opinion I venture to guess, you sir, are no "centrist"

So you don't go by economic or social issues when figuring out ideology you just go with whatever you pull out of your head? Again you seem confused that ideology doesn't belong to any one party. Again will you debate the topic or continue flaming?
 
so tell me how is a guy who starts threads like this, and blogs for Obama, a "Centrist"?

Blogs for Obama? I wrote one blog a year ago. I also wrote on other politicians websites. Again you don't seem to know the difference between an ideology and a party. Care to debate the topic or continue flaming?
 
Raging lefty? So posting about Mark Foley being on the radio makes me a lefty... um okay.


Not what I said, Lie #13 today.


Me pulling up information on Boustany somehow makes me a lefty. Yeah you make sense. Attacks on tea party peoples? Wait didn't the right claim not all tea party people are righties? But moderates, democrats, etc. So are you saying all tea party people are righties?


No comment about your Obama activism?


There's nothing rabid about the discussion except with what you're doing. Again regarding the New Jersey town hall you keep leaving out the bit where my complaint was that they were attacking people who were even on their own side because they sounded intellectual you keep skipping over that part. You know the part where they had no idea who they were even shouting down.

Are you going to debate the topic or continue flaming?



meh, to me it shows real character to put forth honest opinions, and it is a show of cowardice and fear, to hide behind the word soup you put forth to avoid honest debate.


You bore me now
 
Blogs for Obama? I wrote one blog a year ago. I also wrote on other politicians websites. Again you don't seem to know the difference between an ideology and a party. Care to debate the topic or continue flaming?



Links? WE can get to the bottom of your centerdness pretty easy with your claim here. :lamo
 
Not what I said, Lie #13 today.

You don't seem to even know what you say at this point just more flaming by you.



No comment about your Obama activism?

Obama activism? I posted a blog on a politicians website. I don't remember going to any rallies, knocking on doors, collecting donations. Then again you seem to know what everyone does on DP.




meh, to me it shows real character to put forth honest opinions, and it is a show of cowardice and fear, to hide behind the word soup you put forth to avoid honest debate.

Avoid honest debate? You're showing your entire lack of character right now. Every thread I've started this week you seem to come in and instead of debating the topic you want to flame me. Yeah lets talk about character Rev. Only when a mod comes in and posts a warning do you get back on topic.
You bore me now

Yeah take a nap then. Your old record playing is getting tiresome you refuse to have a debate but instead flame.
 
How about we debate the actual topic instead of flaming? Can't post the old links to joe's campaign site he changed it.




I already did, you did not respond to my on topic posts. this topic is dead on arrival.....


And note, I have demonstrate your far left tendencies, and when you had the opportunity to prove the Good Reverend wrong, you cut and ran. :2wave:
 
I already did, you did not respond to my on topic posts. this topic is dead on arrival.....


And note, I have demonstrate your far left tendencies, and when you had the opportunity to prove the Good Reverend wrong, you cut and ran. :2wave:

I've already proven the reverend wrong enough today. When you said I wouldn't condemn the democrats, when you didn't know that idiotry was a word, when you refused to debate and instead flame. When did you post to me on topic? Your first reply in this thread was a flame. I get awfully tired of proving your partisan hackery rev
 
Last edited:
I've already proven the reverend wrong enough today. When you said I wouldn't condemn the democrats, when didn't know that idiotry was a word, when you refused to debate and instead flame. When did you post to me on topic? Your first reply in this thread was a flame. I get awfully tired of proving your partisan hackery rev




More lies, what s this, #15? :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom