• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Looking Forward to new technologies

Robertinfremont

Photo of me taken in the Army 1963
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
30,122
Reaction score
3,395
Location
Meridian, Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
One thing I enjoy about Dr. Judith Curry is she is a devout optimist.

She will inform you in her blog site things for you to know.
So in the spirit of good will, let's begin with her discussion of new technologies.

Energy

The 2010s were the wind and solar decade. We observed stunning declines in the cost of both, although total deployment of wind and solar remains small—in 2019, wind and solar represented less than 9 percent of utility-scale electricity generation in the US. In the 2020s, cost declines will likely stall—wind and solar are already pretty cheap, so the declines of the past decade are not reproducible. Deployment, on the other hand, will accelerate.

Mass deployment of wind and solar will bring challenges. These sources are highly intermittent. When the wind suddenly stops blowing—which happens—we need a way to quickly make up the deficit. Each of the three electricity grids in the continental US—east, west, and Texas—has to remain in supply-demand balance every second of every day. We can use grid storage to smooth out some of the bumps, but storage remains expensive. To reach a grid powered entirely by today’s renewables, we would need storage at a price of $20 per kWh (with caveats).

That storage doesn’t all have to come from batteries, but let’s talk about batteries for a bit. Using Tesla’s grid-scale Powerpack as data, a 232 kWh battery today costs $125,793. That is a price of over $542/kWh. Through innovation, that pricetag will come down over the course of this decade, but improvements on the supply side could easily get swamped by increases in demand. After all, this decade will also include a huge shift toward electric vehicles, which I will discuss below. When demand outpaces supply, prices tend to stay high, even when there is impressive innovation.
 
One thing I enjoy about Dr. Judith Curry is she is a devout optimist.

She will inform you in her blog site things for you to know.
So in the spirit of good will, let's begin with her discussion of new technologies.

Energy

The 2010s were the wind and solar decade. We observed stunning declines in the cost of both, although total deployment of wind and solar remains small—in 2019, wind and solar represented less than 9 percent of utility-scale electricity generation in the US. In the 2020s, cost declines will likely stall—wind and solar are already pretty cheap, so the declines of the past decade are not reproducible. Deployment, on the other hand, will accelerate.

Mass deployment of wind and solar will bring challenges. These sources are highly intermittent. When the wind suddenly stops blowing—which happens—we need a way to quickly make up the deficit. Each of the three electricity grids in the continental US—east, west, and Texas—has to remain in supply-demand balance every second of every day. We can use grid storage to smooth out some of the bumps, but storage remains expensive. To reach a grid powered entirely by today’s renewables, we would need storage at a price of $20 per kWh (with caveats).

That storage doesn’t all have to come from batteries, but let’s talk about batteries for a bit. Using Tesla’s grid-scale Powerpack as data, a 232 kWh battery today costs $125,793. That is a price of over $542/kWh. Through innovation, that pricetag will come down over the course of this decade, but improvements on the supply side could easily get swamped by increases in demand. After all, this decade will also include a huge shift toward electric vehicles, which I will discuss below. When demand outpaces supply, prices tend to stay high, even when there is impressive innovation.
And concurrent with those developments, our use of electricity has been becoming more and more efficient by leaps and bounds. Just compare the costs associated with running an old-style CRT television with the cost of contemporary flat screens. Or the difference between LED lighting and incandescents. And that barely scratches the surface. Smarter homes which turn lights on and off based on usage, for example. More efficient insulation to reduce heating and air conditioning costs. The energy issue is being tackled from both sides - supply and demand.
 
And concurrent with those developments, our use of electricity has been becoming more and more efficient by leaps and bounds. Just compare the costs associated with running an old-style CRT television with the cost of contemporary flat screens. Or the difference between LED lighting and incandescents. And that barely scratches the surface. Smarter homes which turn lights on and off based on usage, for example. More efficient insulation to reduce heating and air conditioning costs. The energy issue is being tackled from both sides - supply and demand.

This spin is exactly what I encourage. I happen to understand all salient terms so wait for more by the ⬆ ⬆ ⬆ author to back up his own assertions.

He should have compared the costs of the CRT vs Flat screen.
He should have compared the costs of the LED to the incandescents.

America has a enormous stock of old homes that are not equipped for LEDs.

The home I live in is fully equipped for LEDs as well as our TV sets are all Flat Screen.
I pay 50% of the cost of energy and report my bill goes up virtually every month to pay for our costs. We also have the latest best rated HVAC system available managed by computers.
 
This spin is exactly what I encourage. I happen to understand all salient terms so wait for more by the ⬆ ⬆ ⬆ author to back up his own assertions.

He should have compared the costs of the CRT vs Flat screen.
He should have compared the costs of the LED to the incandescents.

America has a enormous stock of old homes that are not equipped for LEDs.

The home I live in is fully equipped for LEDs as well as our TV sets are all Flat Screen.
I pay 50% of the cost of energy and report my bill goes up virtually every month to pay for our costs. We also have the latest best rated HVAC system available managed by computers.
And I suspect your insulation is up to par, also?
 
Back
Top Bottom