• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liz Cheney hints Jan 6 committee may hold more public hearings

You mean the guy who was kicked out of BLM long before the insurrection? That guy?
It's fascinating how the cultists seamlessly transition from claiming Trump's words did and could not influence the insurrectionists to claiming the insurrectionists were TOTALLY incited into their behavior by random guys at the insurrection.

*and these random guys are NEVER part of their fetish groups or the Trump collection of high cult priests, naturally

It's like they live a snapshot existence, where no thought they have influences the next thought they have. Very bizarre.
 
Or perhaps the democrats they subpoena all take the 5th and play the delay game just as Trump and his goons have been doing for 2 years. When done correctly, it can take 18-24 months before the SCOTUS orders someone to testify. And then they just display the middle finger just as Trump has.
Yep. Why should Dems play any nicer than Pubs.
 
It's fascinating how the cultists seamlessly transition from claiming Trump's words did and could not influence the insurrectionists to claiming the insurrectionists were TOTALLY incited into their behavior by random guys at the insurrection.
Rank tribalism. There is no honor or clear thought in MAGAland.
 
A "former" person's opinion is irrelevant.
Yet, it's one strong insight by a well experienced 'former' US Attorney bringing to light her opinion about what we should expect at the DOJ.
 
Nope. It was a protest that the left with prior planning incited into a riot.
You can't really believe that. It's just not possible to pretzel a mind into that shape.
 
You mean the guy who was kicked out of BLM long before the insurrection? That guy?
They did not kick him out, they just tried to disassociate him as he was more radical then they preferred. He was still by his own choice a blm ACTIVIST. Ask his brother.
 
But then according to the FBI and the Capitol Police, the riot was planned at least two weeks prior. The suggestion that Trump incited it with his speech is just TDS narrative.

Why was the BLM activist caught inside the capitol inciting violence and vandalism? Do you think Trump sent him? How many others were planted and incited. I was not there, howerver I want the entire truth, not just what the 1/6 witchhunt committee wants us to hear.
The incitement began during a debate between Trump and Biden when Trump said to the Proud Boys, "Stand Back and Stand By". He followed that up with the famous tweet where he said, "Be There, Will be Wild".

You do realize that within a day or two, The Proud Boys had t-shirts with the "Stand Back and Stand By" logo. They were also the first ones to breach the police lines at the capitol. They testified at their seditious conspiracy trials that they were acting on Trump's orders, whether true or false, Trump incited the riot.

Within a few weeks, the DOJ will have at least 12 guilty pleas and convictions for seditious conspiracy and multiple other felonies for the same bunch. This will open the door for indictments to start flowing for the higher ups in the conspiracy chain.

I honestly can't say whether or not Trump will be indicted as well. But so many lawyers, prosecutors and even judges (D & R) have come out and said they believe charges can and should be brought against Trump. At this point, it's pretty overwhelming. Trump was involved and led the multiple coup plots.

The only thing worse than indicting Trump is not indicting Trump. If his morons want to revolt with political violence, then so be it. We are all ready for it. They will be stamped out like the filthy **** roaches they are.
 
Last edited:
Yet, it's one strong insight by a well experienced 'former' US Attorney bringing to light her opinion about what we should expect at the DOJ.
And you can rest assured she still has friends on the inside.
 
May be wrong, but I doubt there is much else to present in a manner that changes anyone else's mind (including anyone at the DOJ.)
 
That "nobody" was in the discussion as a near-future GOP VP or Prez nominee less than 2 years ago.

...until she blasphemed against the orange lard and master.

Do these words just fall out of your brain randomly, or were they supposed to be in that order?
Thanks. I had no clue what he meant after a double and triple take.

Not last hearing == permanent committee

#3 Republican House member == nobody

Random or not, the issue is cognitive reality (IMO.)


Cool chart. Easy to understand.

cognitive-bias-descriptions.jpg
 
They did not kick him out, they just tried to disassociate him as he was more radical then they preferred. He was still by his own choice a blm ACTIVIST. Ask his brother.
Why would I care? Do you think I take your conspiracy theory seriously?
 
Says a librul who probably bought into the Steel Dossier/Russian Collusion hoax.
Says a Marxist commie fascist.

Why would I care what a Marxist commie fascist thinks?
 
Well, I suppose hearings could still take place into Nov. :unsure:







“It’s not necessarily the last day of the hearings,” she told the audience.

“I think we have felt it is very important that the investigation be conducted in a way that is rigorous and disciplined and responsible,” she added.

“That has meant collecting evidence from many, if not all, because of course some people took the Fifth (Amendment) or some people refused to appear, but collecting evidence from all those around the central figure on January 6 before we issued a subpoena for him.”
These "hearings" started out as a bad joke and now, with the revelation that Pelosi actually (conveniently) had a film crew with her on the 6th to document her heroism and leadership, it has turned into overt melodrama. It's like a Russ Meyer film but without the boobs.
 
My thinking exactly. The 1/6 House political circus is, thankfully, coming to an end, and also thankfully being largely ignored, which is already more than deserves.
Whom do you speak for?
 
These "hearings" started out as a bad joke and now, with the revelation that Pelosi actually (conveniently) had a film crew with her on the 6th to document her heroism and leadership, it has turned into overt melodrama. It's like a Russ Meyer film but without the boobs.
Well, no normal person believes any of that.
 
I don't care what you take seriously. You do not matter.
Well, you're always welcome to stop spreading propaganda. Then I won't counter your propaganda.
 
Says a Marxist commie fascist.

Why would I care what a Marxist commie fascist thinks?
Your side supports ANTIFA and BLM. Antifa is a violent anarchist group. BLM is a self professed marxist orgnaization. And chances are that you at some level support Bernie Sanders. For all practical purposes, he is a communist. Same with his groupie AOC which I would bet you also support.
 
Back
Top Bottom