• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liz Cheney hints Jan 6 committee may hold more public hearings

ouch

ouch

Air Muscle
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
10,185
Reaction score
8,886
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Well, I suppose hearings could still take place into Nov. :unsure:





1665863080304.webp

“It’s not necessarily the last day of the hearings,” she told the audience.

“I think we have felt it is very important that the investigation be conducted in a way that is rigorous and disciplined and responsible,” she added.

“That has meant collecting evidence from many, if not all, because of course some people took the Fifth (Amendment) or some people refused to appear, but collecting evidence from all those around the central figure on January 6 before we issued a subpoena for him.”
 
ouch said:
Well, I suppose hearings could still take place into Nov. :unsure:





View attachment 67418214

“It’s not necessarily the last day of the hearings,” she told the audience.

“I think we have felt it is very important that the investigation be conducted in a way that is rigorous and disciplined and responsible,” she added.

“That has meant collecting evidence from many, if not all, because of course some people took the Fifth (Amendment) or some people refused to appear, but collecting evidence from all those around the central figure on January 6 before we issued a subpoena for him.”
Click to expand...
shrug...

Sure...let them have their lame duck fun. It won't change anything.
 
Well, of course, Ms. C. would love the committee to be permanent.

That nobody has become a somebody thanks to the media.
 
TheParser said:
Well, of course, Ms. C. would love the committee to be permanent.

That nobody has become a somebody thanks to the media.
Click to expand...
That "nobody" was in the discussion as a near-future GOP VP or Prez nominee less than 2 years ago.

...until she blasphemed against the orange lard and master.

Do these words just fall out of your brain randomly, or were they supposed to be in that order?
 
ouch said:
If VP Pence would as well, I could also see this going into overtime.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. The FVPOTUS is busy campaigning for election deniers several states. He won't do anything to taint his GOP creds for a 2024 nomination.
 
Mycroft said:
Sure...let them have their lame duck fun. It won't change anything.
Click to expand...
I actually have to agree. The DOJ will still indict DJT. Myself, I would like for the extra innings by the Jan6 Committee be spent on revealing their findings on a few Congress Critters.
 
ouch said:
I actually have to agree. The DOJ will still indict DJT. Myself, I would like for the extra innings by the Jan6 Committee be spent on revealing their findings on a few Congress Critters.
Click to expand...
There won't be any indictment. There's no evidence to support one.

The dog and pony show's narrative is not enough. Besides, the narrative isn't for the DOJ. It's for the useful idiots.
 
Mycroft said:
There won't be any indictment. There's no evidence to support one.

The dog and pony show's narrative is not enough. Besides, the narrative isn't for the DOJ. It's for the useful idiots.
Click to expand...
Yup. Pretty much.
 
Mycroft said:
There won't be any indictment. There's no evidence to support one.
Click to expand...
There's a slight chance that you may be correct, but mostly unlikely unless someone scares AG Garland to get cold feet.


1665866433236.webp
During an appearance on MSNBC on Saturday morning, former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade emphatically stated that she believes Attorney General Merrick Garland will files charges against Donald Trump and then singled out a specific criminal act that will be the basis for the indictment.


Asked by the MSNBC host what would be the easiest charge to file against Trump, she claimed his attempts to get former Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of the 2020 presidential election has all the hallmarks of a slam-dunk case.
 
Mycroft said:
There won't be any indictment. There's no evidence to support one.

The dog and pony show's narrative is not enough. Besides, the narrative isn't for the DOJ. It's for the useful idiots.
Click to expand...
He is talking about the classified docs. Doj will indict him for that and there is plenty of evidence to convict him
 
eohrnberger said:
My thinking exactly. The 1/6 House political circus is, thankfully, coming to an end, and also thankfully being largely ignored, which is already more than deserves.
Click to expand...
It would behoove you to actually watch it, before pretending it isn't happening.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
And then after the GOP takes the House in the midterms, They will hold hearings and ask the questions the 1/6 committee intentionally avoided. Perhaps we will find out who really incited the 1/6 riot.
Click to expand...
And then you woke up, and Mom made you Oatmeal.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
And then after the GOP takes the House in the midterms, They will hold hearings and ask the questions the 1/6 committee intentionally avoided. Perhaps we will find out who really incited the 1/6 riot.
Click to expand...
And of course they will find all of the missing trump ballots from the 2020 election, then re-instate trump into office, imprison Biden and his entire administration
at Guantanamo while awaiting execution. Then they can go down to Dallas to await the arrival of JFK Jr. so he can take his rightful place as VP, replacing Pence, who failed miserably at the job on 1/6.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
And then after the GOP takes the House in the midterms, They will hold hearings and ask the questions the 1/6 committee intentionally avoided. Perhaps we will find out who really incited the 1/6 riot.
Click to expand...
If Republicans take the House people will pay attention to them, but only in the way that people can't help but slow down to look at a traffic accident.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
And then after the GOP takes the House in the midterms, They will hold hearings and ask the questions the 1/6 committee intentionally avoided. Perhaps we will find out who really incited the 1/6 riot.
Click to expand...
Whom do you suspect incited it? I remember a heavy set reddish-haired guy speaking to a crowd, blaming VP Pence and telling people they would lose their country if the didn’t act. Then someone gave them Trump banners and they stormed the Capitol, some chanting “Hang Mike Pence.” So I suspect the red head —and suspect his hair as well.

But I am open to other theories. What’s yours?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom