• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Live discussion of Robert Mueller's testimoony today - hopefully respectful

HumblePi said:
LOL! I created the thread in such a rush this morning that I haven't noticed until five minutes ago that I misspelled 'testimony'.

Laughing-animated-blonde-woman-giphy.gif
Click to expand...

I saw it when I first saw your thread. I chuckled. Moony.
 
Fletch said:
Then impeach him. Democrats wont because they dont have the evidence and they dont have the goods.
Click to expand...

Why bother??? He is now crushed in the court of public opinion
 
Craig234 said:
And Republicans are corrupt, dishonest scum, far worse. It's like the difference between the police officer who lets the mayor off for rape to save his job, wrongly - and the mayor who commits the rape and threatens the officer's job. Of course, 96 Democrats - nearly half the party - just DID vote to pursue impeachment. And, there are other reasons for Democrats to resist impeachment now. ZERO Republicans voted to uphold the rule of law.
Click to expand...

You keep blaming the republicans. Dems control the House. They dont need a single republican vote to impeach Trump. Yet they are not going to do it. Why? There are only two possibilities 1) they dont have the votes 2) they dont have the guts.
 
Fletch said:
You keep blaming the republicans. Dems control the House. They dont need a single republican vote to impeach Trump. Yet they are not going to do it. Why? There are only two possibilities 1) they dont have the votes 2) they dont have the guts.
Click to expand...

Dude. Who controls the Senate? Duh
 
Fletch said:
No hes not. The Mueller testimony was a complete bust. Its over. You just dont know it yet.
Click to expand...

I love it. Dig in. The entire world now knows trump is a criminal. But fight back. It's better that way. Lol
 
vegas giants said:
Dude. Who controls the Senate? Duh
Click to expand...

Doesnt matter. You want him impeached? The dems can do that. If they have the evidence, they can present it at the trial. They wont because they lack the guts
 
Threegoofs said:
LOL.

It is kinda closed if you mean Trumps team was doing all it could to coordinate with Russia.

Just because they were incompetent doesn’t mean they were not willing and eager.

It’s sad that one can just dismiss the evidence and pretend it’s no big deal.
Click to expand...

It does say very plainly that they didn't indict the trump tower team not because they weren't doing anything illegal but because they didn't think they could prove that they knew it was illegal.

Which makes manafort's immediately leaving very interesting.

Because he certainly would know considering his line of work.
 
Fletch said:
Doesnt matter. You want him impeached? The dems can do that. If they have the evidence, they can present it at the trial. They wont because they lack the guts
Click to expand...

No need to. Trump is dead in the water now.


It's like kicking a dog. Lol
 
ajn678 said:
Not a single person that is being honest would call this a grand slam for the Democrats.
Click to expand...

Not a single person that is being honest would call this a base hit for the Democrats
 
HumblePi said:
I don't know, from what Robert Mueller said, there's still ongoing investigations that involve Roger Stone and Michael Flynn. He didn't go into any detail.
Click to expand...

In the indictment of Roger Stone, Mr. Mueller states that when the Wikileaks dump occurred, Stone was asked by the Trump campaign to find out if Wikileaks had any more information. Stone himself had to reach out to find people who could reach out to Wikileaks.
No conspiracy.
 
Athanasius68 said:
But there wasn't. Since there was no crime, it must be assumed the president was exercising his lawful authority.
Click to expand...

Have you considered trump was worried that Mueller would unearth something else as he turned over stones?

Y'all act as if trump hasn't been sanctioned twice since being elected. Once for trump university and once for charity abuse.

You behave like we're assaulting the character of a paragon of virtue.
 
What if...? said:
Have you considered trump was worried that Mueller would unearth something else as he turned over stones?

Y'all act as if trump hasn't been sanctioned twice since being elected. Once for trump university and once for charity abuse.

You behave like we're assaulting the character of a paragon of virtue.
Click to expand...

if Mueller was fired....someone would have replaced him....
 
What if...? said:
Have you considered trump was worried that Mueller would unearth something else as he turned over stones?

Y'all act as if trump hasn't been sanctioned twice since being elected. Once for trump university and once for charity abuse.

You behave like we're assaulting the character of a paragon of virtue.
Click to expand...

You guys are reaching...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom