• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Litigation Coalition Forming to Confront Trump Administration Policies

Credence

Credence

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
17,856
Reaction score
29,043
Location
Long Island NY
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent

​

Democracy 2025. Let's go

​

Litigation Coalition Forming to Confront Trump Administration Policies​


A coalition of over 280 organizations has announced what it says is a multimillion-dollar legal initiative to challenge policies from the incoming Trump administration. The coalition, "Democracy 2025,” includes legal, advocacy, and policy groups to "disrupt far-right attacks on the American people," according to its website.

According to a press release by the coalition, Democracy 2025 is spearheaded by Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy organization to promote "transparent and accountable governance.” The coalition says more than 800 individuals are involved, including "litigators, strategists, advocates, academics, policy experts, and faith leaders."

The coalition said it will use its litigation fund to "ensure swift and effective responses to any executive actions deemed harmful or unlawful."

https://thefederalnewswire.com/stor...ing-to-confront-trump-administration-policies


Link to Democracy 2025 online...
 
"We are the resistence!" is so 2016.


How dispairing it must be knowing that even if liberals manage to successfully challenge a Trump administraion policy before their beloved 9th circuit court that it has no chance of being upheld by the conservative supreme court. Just has to suck all the wind out of you.

*sigh*

Our poor idiot liberal friends have nothing to look forward to except one crushing defeat after another. You sort of have to feel sorry for them. Of course after a good amount of side slapping laughter.
 
dmpi said:
They don't even try to hide lawfare anymore. Now they put it on a pedestal and proudly show it off.
Click to expand...
Citizens challenging their government in court is lawfare? Citizens have every right under the Constitution to challenge the legality of government actions.
 
Callen said:
Citizens challenging their government in court is lawfare? Citizens have every right under the Constitution to challenge the legality of government actions.
Click to expand...
You mean what they did to Trump?! If it's happening to you I bet you would change your tune.
 
dobieg said:
"We are the resistence!" is so 2016.


How dispairing it must be knowing that even if liberals manage to successfully challenge a Trump administraion policy before their beloved 9th circuit court that it has no chance of being upheld by the conservative supreme court. Just has to suck all the wind out of you.

*sigh*

Our poor idiot liberal friends have nothing to look forward to except one crushing defeat after another. You sort of have to feel sorry for them. Of course after a good amount of side slapping laughter.
Click to expand...
Is it now the rights position that a government should not be challenge? Really?
 
Pick the one word that doesn't describe Democrat's current emotional state.

1.) Despondent
2.) Clock tower unhinged
3.) HAPPY!!!
4.) Clinically depressed
5.) Clinically insane
 
dmpi said:
You mean what they did to Trump?! If it's happening to you I bet you would change your tune.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to relitigate all that but legally challenging the ACTIONS of a government is much different than prosecuting an individual for alleged criminal acts.

Do you really want a government to go unchecked when they ignore the Constitution? Did you feel that way when RW groups went after student loan forgiveness or the other 70 some suits against Biden. What about the over 30 times the Obama Administration was sued for their policies or actions?
 
dmpi said:
My life is too short to be talking to someone who just woke up from a four year nap.
Click to expand...

:ROFLMAO: Typical response when one does not or cannot explain their position.

Trump was charged in some cases based on Grand Jury recommendations.
Trump lost a civil trail
Trump had the document case thrown out not because of the evidence but because the Judge Cannon ruled the Special Council was not hired properly.
etc.
 
We have complete control of government and the Supreme Court and all of a sudden the Left wants us to play nice after 8 years of hoaxes, impeachments, ridiculous criminal prosecutions of their political opponents and slanderous comparisons to Hitler, fascists and whatever else those nickel heads could come up with.

We say,...Nah.

Have a nice day now!
 
Callen said:
Is it now the rights position that a government should not be challenge? Really?
Click to expand...
Not at all they should continue to ignore the will of the people and fight for the policies that cost them the election. Right on Callen!
 
Credence said:

​

Democracy 2025. Let's go

​

Litigation​

Click to expand...

All the litigation in the world did not save democracy, it is time to go to war.
They've been thirsting for it for a decade anyway.


Less to do with the recent election and everything to do with the nonstop litany of threats and the agenda being formed to deliver on those threats.
A political party (Republicans) decided a long time ago that no opposition should be tolerated, and they are now openly attacking the constitutional provisions for the republic that make up our republican system of governance.
 
DrewPaul said:
Not at all they should continue to ignore the will of the people and fight for the policies that cost them the election. Right on Callen!
Click to expand...
Such nonsense. Yes Trump won but that does not mean Trump has carte blanche to defy the Constitution nor does it mean everyone who voted for him loves every thing he does. My bet is a huge number of people who voted for him are aghast at his choice for AG and Secretary of Defense. I also would bet a large number would oppose the use to the military to round up migrants.

Trump didn't win because voter's thought people were mean to him. He won because they were frustrated with inflation and fed up with the Biden Administration.
 
Callen said:
Such nonsense. Yes Trump won but that does not mean Trump has carte blanche to defy the Constitution nor does it mean everyone who voted for him loves every thing he does. My bet is a huge number of people who voted for him are aghast at his choice for AG and Secretary of Defense. I also would bet a large number would oppose the use to the military to round up migrants.

Trump didn't win because voter's thought people were mean to him. He won because they were frustrated with inflation and fed up with the Biden Administration.
Click to expand...
We would not have to use the military if the sanctuary cities followed the law. Law Enforcment would be used to help border patrol round up those here with no documentation. If it were up to me and the law changed, any mayor or governor would be arrested and prosecuted for aiding and abetting known criminals. Trump also won the election because of the problem of illegal immigration.
Trump is at least getting his programs signed into law. The liberal cities just decided to defy the law all on their own. The Obama admin should have put a stop to it in the beginning, but all he did was speak out against it to get praise from Republicans.
How is Trump defying the Constitution? He is allowed to pick anyone he wants for his cabinet. I think the AG might be shot down. He will pick another.
 
Raven484 said:
We would not have to use the military if the sanctuary cities followed the law. Law Enforcment would be used to help border patrol round up those here with no documentation. If it were up to me and the law changed, any mayor or governor would be arrested and prosecuted for aiding and abetting known criminals.
Click to expand...
Local law enforcement is paid by local taxpayer to enforce the laws of their communities, not federal law. If the Feds want them to enforce federal law the need to fund them to do that

Raven484 said:
Trump is at least getting his programs signed into law.
Click to expand...
He is ? I think you're way ahead of yourself on that !
Raven484 said:
How is Trump defying the Constitution? He is allowed to pick anyone he wants for his cabinet. I think the AG might be shot down. He will pick another.
Click to expand...
Not yet, but he has signaled he wants to bypass Constitutional "advise and consent" and official security checks. Then there is the notion of deploying the military against civilians. The power the right is willing to cede to the government is shocking and totally contrary to conservative principles.
 
Callen said:
Such nonsense. Yes Trump won but that does not mean Trump has carte blanche to defy the Constitution nor does it mean everyone who voted for him loves every thing he does. My bet is a huge number of people who voted for him are aghast at his choice for AG and Secretary of Defense. I also would bet a large number would oppose the use to the military to round up migrants.
Click to expand...
I agree, Trump won the I despise Trump on a personal level but will hold my nose and vote for him anyway voters. A large number would support it also.

Trump didn't win because voter's thought people were mean to him. He won because they were frustrated with inflation and fed up with the Biden Administration.
Click to expand...

And because many on the left were fed up with Biden's border policies. This despite Trump winning in 2016 on that very issue...listen to these folks who were left leaning.



They don't like Trump but they know he'll change course on immigration policy.
 
dmpi said:
They don't even try to hide lawfare anymore. Now they put it on a pedestal and proudly show it off.
Click to expand...
To bad we need to defend our democracy from dictatorship.
 
Lovebug said:
To bad we need to defend our democracy from dictatorship.
Click to expand...
Still going with that line...I guess its all you have left.
 
dobieg said:
We have complete control of government and the Supreme Court and all of a sudden the Left wants us to play nice after 8 years of hoaxes, impeachments, ridiculous criminal prosecutions of their political opponents and slanderous comparisons to Hitler, fascists and whatever else those nickel heads could come up with.

We say,...Nah.

Have a nice day now!
Click to expand...

These are lies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom