- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 9,594
- Reaction score
- 2,072
- Location
- France
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
This random resource randomly provided by the Australian embassy in France, randomly pointed out by someone in France who appears to be a reincarnated figure of note from the 18th century.
I'm aware it's an official source of info provided by the Australian embassy in Paris.The source is NOT random. The list was compiled by the Australian embassy in Paris. (The English-speaking doctors are accredited and fully part of the French National Healthcare System.)
The listing is thus useful to the English-speaking community in France that would need medical attention.
Your remark is stoopidly inconsiderate ...
You know, most of the time in a debate forum its customary to add at least a sentence of your own commentary when starting a thread. This isn't a lazy link sharing site and nobody has anything here to discuss.
I'm aware it's an official source of info provided by the Australian embassy in Paris.
But it's presented here without context, which makes it random in my book.
I mean, I assume you had a reason for posting it.
I mean, I assume you had a reason for posting it.
It lacked an explanation for why this information was presented.The entry was informational. What's wrong with that?
I'm perfectly fine with you posting it, I'm just confused by the lack of information as to why.Why should it not be posted?
Do you live in France? Have you ever been to a doctor in France with an illness? Do you understand that treating an illness without delay is capital to its remedy? And that understanding what your illness may be is also central to its cure?
No? Then, aside from the blabbering, evidently you don't know what you are talking about ...
I learn a bit more of it all the time. Plus it keeps changing.Look up the word "informational".
Where did you learn English ... ?
You've made no point, taken no position, and provided zero basis for discussion. Are you just completely lazy or did you think this was a viable debate topic? Make a point.The entry was informational. What's wrong with that?
There are PLENTY of notifications on this site.You've made no point, taken no position, and provided zero basis for discussion. Are you just completely lazy or did you think this was a viable debate topic? Make a point.
Notifications telling us what your point is and why you started this thread? No, I haven't received any such notifications. Why don't you tell us what the basis of discussion is.There are PLENTY of notifications on this site.
You just happen to be blind them. (Or, is it just plain ignorance?)
Yawwwwnnnnnnnn .....
Notifications telling us what your point is and why you started this thread? No, I haven't received any such notifications. Why don't you tell us what the basis of discussion is
I'm aware it's an official source of info provided by the Australian embassy in Paris.
But it's presented here without context, which makes it random in my book.
I'm aware it's an official source of info provided by the Australian embassy in Paris.
But it's presented here without context, which makes it random in my book.
I mean, I assume you had a reason for posting it.
Most other developed countries control costs, in part, by having the government play a stronger role in negotiating prices for healthcare. Their healthcare systems don’t require the high administrative costs that drive up pricing in the U.S. As the global overseers of their country's systems, these governments have the ability to negotiate lower drug, medical equipment, and hospital costs. They can influence the treatments used and patients’ ability to go to specialists or seek more expensive treatments. Consumers may have fewer choices, but costs are controlled.
In the U.S., a lack of political support has prevented the government from taking a larger role in controlling healthcare costs. The Affordable Care Act focused on ensuring access to healthcare but maintained the status quo to encourage competition among insurers and healthcare providers.
Now that the costs related to COVID-19 threaten to swamp both the healthcare system and government budgets, the time for change may be at hand.
I really don't think you know how debate forums work. Is your English that horrible?Blah, blah, blah and more blah.
You are not an English-speaking person who resides in France and would like to have a English-speaking doctor ...
PS: You got "rabid" right ... !
I'm aware the healthcare system in the US has problems, as I've avoided even approaching health care due to a partially irrational fear of it's cost, for years now.You don't live in France, I gather. It is out of context to show people (who don't speak French but live in France) where to go to see a doctor who speaks English?
Moreover, National Healthcare in Europe costs "peanuts" compared to the privatized rip-off version in America.
From here: Investopedia: 6 Reasons Healthcare Is So Expensive in the U.S.
"The Bottom Line":
Thanks!
What this thread about?
The French Labour Force Survey estimates that on 1 January 2016 there were 148,800 British citizens living in France while the latest French INSEE census estimated there to be 151,800 British citizens living in France in 2014.Oct 6, 2017
According to the American embassy in Paris, as of 2015, there are about 150,000 to 200,000 American citizens residing in France.
I really don't think you know how debate forums work. Is your English that horrible?
Multiple people have asked what this thread is about yet you can't tell them. Which is why it was a failure and nobody had anything to discuss other than your laziness. Maybe Facebook is better for your reposts.I will take you out of your misery as regards my participation on this forum.
You go on Ignore ...
Thanks!
What this thread about?