• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lindsey Graham Tells Us in Advance That He Will Be Lying Under Oath


Exculpatory evidence has already been presented, in the form of the call transcript and comments by Zelesky.
 

Sure, you can rail about the Republicans not being impartial, but what about the Democrats? They certainly aren’t impartial either. They’re trouncing at the bit to vote guilty for removal. Their minds already made up before the trial begins. So too, the Republicans. Neither side can be impartial. Not when approximately 90% of democrats are in favor of impeachment and removal vs. 90% of Republicans against.

This is nothing new, during Bill Clinton’s trial each senator had already made up their mind also before the trial began. No impartiality there either. There may be two, three, four senators that will weigh the evidence given, then decide which way to vote. But for the rest, minds are closed to whatever evidence is given, their vote pre-determined ahead of time. For the rest, presenting evidence and witnesses is irrelevant, Republican and Democratic.

In our polarized and ultra-high partisan political world, we live in, it’s no surprise one side can’t see their side isn’t impartial at all, but expects the other side to be.
 
So the Ukrainian President was lying when he said he never felt pressure from President Trump to investigate Biden or announce an investigation into Biden?


Yes of course he was, he wanted to continue getting aid.

Why did he set a time on CNN to announce the investigation, then canceled when trump got caught???
 
It is far worse than Watergate. Attempting to extort a foreign power to meddle in our elections is beyond anything Nixon tried to do.

Which article of impeachment was "extortion" again? I never saw the democrats present any evidence of it during their inquiries.

Speaking of the inquiries, what happened to the bribery charge the democrats kept saying Trump was guilty of? Which article of impeachment number is that one?

How about the "obstruction of justice" they swore Trump engaged in and said was absolutely proven based on the Mueller report? Surely that's one of the articles of impeachment... What article number was that one again?

.
 
There was no extortion, bribery, nor quid pro quo

:lamo:lamo:lamo

Maybe if you click your heels together as you repeat that chant over and over again it will make it come true.

Until that point in time trump got caught a d you just can't admit it to yourself...
 
Democratic members of congress said they would impeach Trump, long before the Ukraine story ever hit.

"Russia, if you're listening..."

Good enough for me. And according to the Constitution, absolutely justifiable on that alone.
I DARE you or ANYONE, if you could go back in time to the early days of this republic, and utter something like that in the debates, and watch what would have likely happened.

PS: Mitch McConnell, January 2009, swore a vow to make sure to do everything in his power to make Obama fail.
Spoken like a true dyed in the wool Kentucky "nigger-hater" if ever there was one.

No wonder you love Mitch so much...it's like he's your BFF.
 

Except McConnell sounds like a bigoted rural country bumpkin judge, the kind in a one-traffic light Kentucky town, who owns the towing company, and is the sheriff, and the local judge all at the same time.

McConnell has breathed enough life into the screaming stereotype of the ignorant crooked redneck hillbilly to last through to the age where human beings are populating new planets.
 
:lamo:lamo:lamo

Maybe if you click your heels together as you repeat that chant over and over again it will make it come true.

Until that point in time trump got caught a d you just can't admit it to yourself...

Trump isn't being charged with extortion, bribery, or QPQ. No charge, no crime.
 
:lamo:lamo:lamo

Maybe if you click your heels together as you repeat that chant over and over again it will make it come true.

Until that point in time trump got caught a d you just can't admit it to yourself...

Then I'll ask you...

Which article of impeachment was "extortion" again? I never saw the democrats present any evidence of it during their inquiries.

Speaking of the inquiries, what happened to the bribery charge the democrats kept saying Trump was guilty of? Which article of impeachment number is that one?

How about the "obstruction of justice" they swore Trump engaged in and said was absolutely proven based on the Mueller report? Surely that's one of the articles of impeachment... What article number was that one again?

.
 
Exculpatory evidence has already been presented, in the form of the call transcript and comments by Zelesky.

Really when was zelinski sworn in I must of missed that?

Was it the same time that trump swore his memo was what was actually said???
 
They told Trump 'we're going to get you', because they refused to accept the outcome of the election. This isn't Watergate big guy, the people will turn on you and the Dems for this.

You're really itching for that civil war aren't you? IDK why considering how scared you all are of ANTIFA.
 
You're really itching for that civil war aren't you? IDK why considering how scared you all are of ANTIFA.

Do you think that Americans are going to tolerate selective enforcement of our laws? How would you feel if your candidate had won, and Republican House members told you on day one that they would find a reason to impeach him/her?
 

And?................
 


The obstruction of justice will be charged after he is out of office...
 
Considering there is documented evidence and tapes of Queen Lindsey being as vocally anti-Trump as I am, back in 2016, I'm not surprised.

Some people come to their senses.
 

And?...............
 

Lucy pulled the football away so many times on the Democrats that I wonder why they even play the game anymore. And they call HIM dumb. LOL
 
Do you think that Americans are going to tolerate selective enforcement of our laws? How would you feel if your candidate had won, and Republican House members told you on day one that they would find a reason to impeach him/her?

We’ve tolerated selective enforcement of our laws since the beginning. That’s not changing ever.
 
So you're mad at Democrats for sticking to their promises? No wonder you love Trump.

You mean their promises of impeaching him as soon as he took the oath of office? Yeah. That's a great promise for the do nothing Congress.
 
"Russia, if you're listening..."

"Can't we just drone strike him (Julian Assange)"


Trump was making a joke. I think you know that.


So you have one Republican senator who said that he would make sure Obama's agenda failed. He lied at that, didn't he? Obama got the bailout billions safely into the hands of the banking sharks who wrecked the economy, his crowning achievement.

On the other hand, we have a minimum of a half dozen Democrats in Congress who stated publicly that they would impeach the President. Now they're making good on their promise. Come back when you've got something meatier than accusing me of being a 'nigger hater' (I do take note of your love for using pejoratives like nigger and darkie though).
 
So, that flies entirely in the face of what McConnell plans to do -- i.e., shut it down before it even starts. You lower level cult members need to pay more attention to what your masters are doing.

It may not be what they want to do, but it is what they should do. I march to my own drum. I don't need any personality or politician to tell me what to think. That is why I am conservative. If I needed other people to tell me what to think or how to live I'd be progressive.

Yes of course he was, he wanted to continue getting aid.

Why did he set a time on CNN to announce the investigation, then canceled when trump got caught???

Maybe because the interview was no longer necessary. Let me ask you this skippy, if Biden did extort the former Ukrainian President, how should Trump and Barr go about asking Ukraine for help in an investigation? Oh, and what about the OMB review that eventually justified the aid being sent? Do you think all aid should be allocated regardless of its effectiveness? White House Budget Office Defends Holdup of Ukraine Aid as ‘Pending a Policy Decision’ in Memo | National Review
 
And neither will the Dems.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…