• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lies of the Left About the Mueller Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
he's probably up to 101.8% on Rasmussen, though.

It's interesting to me because I can't recall anything else in the last year or so that's dented Trump's support. This seems like it might actually leave a mark. We'll see.
 
I dont know. I offered it as a possible explanation

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

What do you think happened, really? Do you think he was invited? Wouldn't it make sense? He was the face of the investigation. Not matter which side of the aisle you're on you have to admit he's kind of a hero.
 
It's interesting to me because I can't recall anything else in the last year or so that's dented Trump's support. This seems like it might actually leave a mark. We'll see.

i suppose we will. however, among his base, this report is the total exoneration that he claims it is.
 
His tweets seem to suggest that he still feels the report exonerates him. What are you seeing in them thst i am missing?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

His tweets are not those of a person who actually believes they are innocent. His ego is such that even the slightest suggestion of wrong-doing on his part brings out his biggest guns (tweets). The truly innocent would not immediately go on the 'attack' mode, especially so when one has the power of the presidency. He could quietly - I know, quitely is beyond his capacity - order investigations of those he thinks are/were the perpetrators of this 'crime' against him and his 2016 campaign workers.
 
i suppose we will. however, among his base, this report is the total exoneration that he claims it is.

If the poll is meaningful that 3% came from somewhere, but I agree his rabid base seems to have their own reality locked in.
 
Will you please get an English Dictionary and take some English grammar lessons and come back then! This has gotten absurd.
 
Russia and the Trump campiagn both worked in secret to elect Trump. members of the Trump campaign met with Russian well over 100 times, often with the goal of exchanging information related to the election.

It may not be a conspiracy, it may not be criminal, but it was clearly collusion. He might have proved conspiracy had not there been so much obstruction.

But hey, guilty or not, isn't it only important that Trump get away with everything?
 
His tweets are not those of a person who actually believes they are innocent. His ego is such that even the slightest suggestion of wrong-doing on his part brings out his biggest guns (tweets). The truly innocent would not immediately go on the 'attack' mode, especially so when one has the power of the presidency. He could quietly - I know, quitely is beyond his capacity - order investigations of those he thinks are/were the perpetrators of this 'crime' against him and his 2016 campaign workers.
Your right quietly is not his personality but it hardly indicates he is guility of anything. He feels the need to respond to every accusation made against him. I believe after the punching bags the gop has been putting up for the past few decades; that personality is what got him elected.

The left has turned yelling and screaming yo get their way into an art form. Seems people on the right are responding in kind by electing their own big mouth who yells and screams when he foes not get his way.

But i digress from my point...

Trumps tweets are consistent with who he is and they do not indicate he is guility of anything.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
The topic is fonts and memes, which seems to be all you know. Sorry, I'm fresh out.




Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will.



AS PREDICTABLE AS THE SUNRISE....any EXCUSE TO RUN AWAY from the ACTUAL POINTS.
 
1.) The continued claim that , somehow, in the feverish imaginings of Leftgoofyworld, Mueller "found Trump Russia collusion."

Face it Grok, you made a really stupid and foolish victory dance and you got punked by the truth.

We all saw it, and it was hilarious.

Barr lied to you, and you ate it up, and we are all laughing.
 
1.) The continued claim that , somehow, in the feverish imaginings of Leftgoofyworld, Mueller "found Trump Russia collusion."

He SPECIFICALLY STATES that HE DID NOT.


2.) The NEW LIE, that "Mueller told Congress to investigate PRes.Trump."


Complete and TOTAL BULL****... the report says NO SUCH THING, and NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT WAS SAID.


3.) The ridiculous claim that Congress is "ENTITLED" to whatever the House Dunce-o-crat Politburo decides they want. The LEGAL REALITY is that the USAG wasn't evne reuwitre to show Congress a SYLLABLE of the report, BY LAW, by chose to do so by his own volition. The Special Counsel report is required to be made to the USAG....PERIOD. And he did a great job of doing so, redacting only what was required by law.

The SCOTUS established as far back as 1957 that Congress is NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT entity, and does not get to demand "evidence " to try to "FIND CRIMES" it hopes are there: In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes.


4.) That the report DID NOT DEBUNK the DOSSIER: It absolutely CRUSHED the "main pints" of the dossier, as well as the sick, "porn" bull**** that the left has been "circle-jerking" over for two years.


These and the rest of the FAKE NEWS/LEFT LIES will continue from the STILL-TRAUMATIZED LEFT, even after Barr's and Mueller's upcoming testimony further SENDS THEM DOWN IN FLAMES...wait and see....the left just CANNOT HELP ITSELF.





Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will.

Hey Grok. I am surprised you have not opined yet on my thread "A simple question for Trump supporters". With you being one of the most ardent, I expected you to be the first one responding.
 
MADEUP BULL**** from LEFTGOOFYWORLD.


He found NO COOPERATION, PERIOD...an did not stipulate "CRIMINAL" as a qualification.


ANOTHER LIE ABOUT THE MUELLER REPORT TO ADD TO THE LIST....

Barr.webp
 
Hey Grok. I am surprised you have not opined yet on my thread "A simple question for Trump supporters". With you being one of the most ardent, I expected you to be the first one responding.

Grok won't go to a serious thread where he has to answer questions in a serious manner, he would rather make wank threads like this where he can scream and yell and embarrass himself, but he can't fathom how embarrassing it looks.
 
Russia and the Trump campiagn both worked in secret to elect Trump. members of the Trump campaign met with Russian well over 100 times, often with the goal of exchanging information related to the election.

It may not be a conspiracy, it may not be criminal, but it was clearly collusion. He might have proved conspiracy had not there been so much obstruction.

But hey, guilty or not, isn't it only important that Trump get away with everything?

Hillary paid for Russian oppo dirt on Trump, but that will be the next investigation.
 
Grok won't go to a serious thread where he has to answer questions in a serious manner, he would rather make wank threads like this where he can scream and yell and embarrass himself, but he can't fathom how embarrassing it looks.

Careful, grokkie will meme you hard!~
 
Grok won't go to a serious thread where he has to answer questions in a serious manner, he would rather make wank threads like this where he can scream and yell and embarrass himself, but he can't fathom how embarrassing it looks.

Respectfully, the left here has a whole bunch of posters who's primary comments are: liar, imbecile, moron, and "I never said that and you can't prove that I did."

There's not an original thought or crumb of substance among tbem.
 
What evidence did Mueller find concerning a Trump Campaign Russian conspiracy ??

We are still closing in on that. It is still just a matter of time. If we keep yelling witch sooner or later we will burn us a witch. Oh you said evidence. Who needs evidence in a witch hunt. Plus we have him for obstruction of said witch hunt. Now we can burn him for that. We are the Borg you will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. Oh and my unicorn ranch is doing great.
 
We are still closing in on that. It is still just a matter of time. If we keep yelling witch sooner or later we will burn us a witch. Oh you said evidence. Who needs evidence in a witch hunt. Plus we have him for obstruction of said witch hunt. Now we can burn him for that. We are the Borg you will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. Oh and my unicorn ranch is doing great.

I laughed :thumbs:
 
First of all - LOVE the font-tination! Very nicely done! I'm thinking of making:

""FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!"

My new signature.

Serious question: Why do you think Mueller wasn't one of the people standing behind Barr during Friday's press conference?

Nothing in the dossier has been proved wrong.
Do you trust don the con or a mi6 guy?
And the investigation started before the republican paid for dossier came into play
Later Hillary bought it
Dumb knees news spew
 
Hillary paid for Russian oppo dirt on Trump, but that will be the next investigation.

No, she bought it from a repub.
Where DO you get your info?
Gateway pundit?
These zero college rubes don't believe we landed on the moon
 
No, she bought it from a repub.
Where DO you get your info?
Gateway pundit?
These zero college rubes don't believe we landed on the moon

LOL! There wasn't an "it" to buy.
Where do you get your info? Rachel Maddow? Some other Democrat media superPAC?
 
LOL! There wasn't an "it" to buy.
Where do you get your info? Rachel Maddow? Some other Democrat media superPAC?

In October 2015, Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates.
Trump–Russia dossier - Wikipedia

Gee, it seems conservatives began the Fusion GPF/Steele mess. Whoda thunkit?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom