• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Liberalism Is Yesterday's News

I am still amazed at the stupidity of the voters.

I guess trump 1.0 and Brexit should have told me

But I needed Trump 2.0 to drive the point home
 
You haven't stated any facts.

I stated a lot of facts and explained exactly how and why your party is Marxist.

You ignored all of it and engaged in ad hom attacks.

I don't think you understand the first thing about Marxism

How would you know?

One of us has read the Manifesto and Capitol Vol. 1 - you clearly have not. You obviously have no understanding of dialectical materialism or the foundations of the ideas you promote on behalf of your party. I explained the connection between CRT, DEI, and traditional Marxian theory - you called names in response.

.Why are you implying a Nazi connection?

There is a distinct fascist element to the democrat party absolutism. Most of the drones will not even entertain thoughts that are not fed to them directly by the party propaganda corps. It smacks loudly of Berlin, circa 1938.
 
I stated a lot of facts and explained exactly how and why your party is Marxist.

You ignored all of it and engaged in ad hom attacks.

You slathered incoherently about hive minds, demonstrating you are not a serious poster.

How would you know?

One of us has read the Manifesto and Capitol Vol. 1

Lmao you have not Das Kapital.

There is a distinct fascist element to the democrat party absolutism. Most of the drones will not even entertain thoughts that are not fed to them directly by the party propaganda corps. It smacks loudly of Berlin, circa 1938.

Hey do me a favor and Google what political parties the Nazis formed a coalition with
 
ROFL

Never heard of the Wuhan Designer Virus® that was unleashed on America and the world in in 2019? Commonly called "Covid-19". A virus created in the Wuhan Laboratories, funded by the NIH, and conveniently unleashed to thwart the Trump presidency.
Prove this wildly moronic claim.
Hey, crimes against humanity is just one service democrats offer the world.
Why do you post such abject stupidity?
 
It's your side that is rigging them. They are actively attempting to steal a Senate seat in Pennsylvania as we speak. They are even admityting that they are cheating.

:ROFLMAO:

Prove your ridiculous claims. If you can!
 
You slathered incoherently about hive minds,
So your usual "Nuhn Uhn."

demonstrating you are not a serious poster.

More childish insults.

I understand, you don't grasp the subject.

Lmao you have not Das Kapital.
Care to repeat that in English?

Capitol is three volumes, I have read the first.

I can provide a link to an online PDF copy if you want to try and catch up. Alas, most leftists revel in their ignorance, The party tells them what they need to know, any other knowledge is heresy.
Hey do me a favor and Google what political parties the Nazis formed a coalition with

You mean like Joseph Stalin and the USSR?

Oh, MSNBC never told you about that?
 
You mean like Joseph Stalin and the USSR?

Oh, MSNBC never told you about that?

What, this?

"“Never forget that the rulers of present-day Russia are common blood-stained criminals; that they are the scum of humanity"
-Adolf Hitler
 
What, this?

"“Never forget that the rulers of present-day Russia are common blood-stained criminals; that they are the scum of humanity"
-Adolf Hitler

Sounds like Trump talking about his enemies
 
So your usual "Nuhn Uhn."



More childish insults.

I understand, you don't grasp the subject.


Care to repeat that in English?

Capitol is three volumes, I have read the first.

I can provide a link to an online PDF copy if you want to try and catch up. Alas, most leftists revel in their ignorance, The party tells them what they need to know, any other knowledge is heresy.

I like how you admit you haven't even finished the volume. I don't blame you entirely, it's a dry read, but don't go off pretending you know what you're talking about.

I know you haven't read it, or at least digested it, because your entire framework is nonsense. If you actually understood Marxism you would identify that Marx rejected segregating of the working class through ethnicity and nationality because it undermined class consciousness, and you would know therefore that the viewing of legal history through the lens of race relations, which is all Critical Race Theory actually does, bears no relation to the concept of historical materialism as that which underpins Marxist theory.

You mean like Joseph Stalin and the USSR?

Oh, MSNBC never told you about that?

No, not the non-aggression pact, I mean the Coalition in the Reichstag.
 
I like how you admit you haven't even finished the volume. I don't blame you entirely, it's a dry read, but don't go off pretending you know what you're talking about.

ROFL

Read for content. You get too excited wanting to hurl insults and call names, missing what was actually posted.

I know you haven't read it, or at least digested it,

ROFL

Did you want me to post a link so you can try and catch up?

because your entire framework is nonsense. If you actually understood Marxism you would identify that Marx rejected segregating of the working class through ethnicity and nationality because it undermined class consciousness,

So then the initial critical theory involved class, but was perverted by the racism of democrats to morph into CRT. Yet still the dialectic is the core - oppressed verses oppressor.

Marx pitted the unskilled laborer, the proletarian, against the middle class, the bourgeoisie. democrats expand this to race, religion, sexual orientation, and anything else that can be used to pit one segment of society against another.

and you would know therefore that the viewing of legal history through the lens of race relations, which is all Critical Race Theory actually does, bears no relation to the concept of historical materialism as that which underpins Marxist theory.

ROFL

Had you any understanding of marxism, you would grasp critical theory. But you are too busy name calling and hurling insults to discuss, much less learn anything.


Critical Race Theory simply folds the traditional racism of democrats into standard Marxian Critical Theory.

No, not the non-aggression pact, I mean the Coalition in the Reichstag.

Oh, you want to ignore that Hitler was allied with Stalin?

And no, Hitler did not form a coalition with Donald Trump.
 
ROFL

Read for content. You get too excited wanting to hurl insults and call names, missing what was actually posted.

ROFL

Did you want me to post a link so you can try and catch up?

To "catch up" would imply you're ahead, and not in fact face down at the bottom of a well, screaming incoherently about marxists.

So then the initial critical theory involved class, but was perverted by the racism of democrats to morph into CRT. Yet still the dialectic is the core - oppressed verses oppressor.

Marx pitted the unskilled laborer, the proletarian, against the middle class, the bourgeoisie. democrats expand this to race, religion, sexual orientation, and anything else that can be used to pit on segment of society against another.

ROFL

Had you any understanding of marxism, you would grasp critical theory. But you are too busy name calling and hurling insults to discuss, much less learn anything.


Critical Race Theory simply folds the traditional racism of democrats into standard Marxian Critical Theory.

lmao no.

Critical race theory is an off shoot of critical legal theory, which was centered around the role the law plays in maintaining the power structures of society. CRT examined this through the lens of race to determine that the law is an insufficient vehicle for the advancement of civil rights.

Tell me, what did Marx write about the law and jurisprudence?


Oh, you want to ignore that Hitler was allied with Stalin?

No.

And no, Hitler did not form a coalition with Donald Trump.

****ing what? Where did I ever claim that?
 
To "catch up" would imply you're ahead, and not in fact face down at the bottom of a well, screaming incoherently about marxists.

It would imply that I have read the work, which I have, and that you have not - which is obvious.

lmao no.

Critical race theory is an off shoot of critical legal theory, which was centered around the role the law plays in maintaining the power structures of society. CRT examined this through the lens of race to determine that the law is an insufficient vehicle for the advancement of civil rights.

Tell me, what did Marx write about the law and jurisprudence?

LOL;

Marx was a Journalist by trade - he wrote extensively.


You really know very little of this subject.


No.

****ing what? Where did I ever claim that?

You are doing all you can to obfuscate the fact that Stalin and Hitler, being virtually identical in both philosophical and governmental views, were also allies and partners.
 
It would imply that I have read the work, which I have,

You, by your own admission, haven't even finished it.

LOL;

Marx was a Journalist by trade - he wrote extensively.


You really know very little of this subject.

Go ahead and reveal which one of these provides his insight in how Marx viewed the law and matters of jurisprudence.

You are doing all you can to obfuscate the fact that Stalin and Hitler, being virtually identical in both philosophical and governmental views, were also allies and partners.

No, I'm not, because that wasn't even what I was referencing. Did you look up what political parties the Nazis formed a coalition with in the Reichstag?
 
DCCougar said:
MAGAs generally believe what makes them feel good.
That's a whole lot of projection there...
Uh, no. I base my beliefs on evidence -- something MAGAs, and especially Trump, have demonstrably bypassed. Sixty-one Trump lawsuits in 2021, all DISMISSED. Why? That bothersome need for evidence.
 
:ROFLMAO:

Prove your ridiculous claims. If you can!
I suppose you have not been paying attention to the Senate race in that state where Democrat Senator Casey is still refusing to concede defeat and at least three democrat controlled countings are padding a recount by intentionally adding invalid ballots to the count, even after getting slapped by the State supreme court and as of yesterday by the democrat governor Shapiro. They have even admitted they are breaking the law.

 
Back
Top Bottom