• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

LGBT adoption and parenting

CLAX1911 said:
Well it would mean things that exist outside of nature. Like demons or ghosts.

but then again I'm not the one saying that gay people are supernatural.
Click to expand...

Big shoot.... so intellectual
 
Helix said:
Masters, as well as decades in the field.

if you're genuinely concerned about mental health and psychological damage of kids, perhaps you should read up on the damage that the remaining homophobic portion of our society is doing to kids. it's a real eye opener, and it makes your position seem darkly ironic.

The Dangers of Homophobia | Psychology Today

Facts About Suicide – The Trevor Project

luckily, younger generations are less scared of LBGT people, so societal views are evolving.
Click to expand...

Who said that the generations are of LBGT people?
 
AmIsraelHai said:
Who said that the generations are of LBGT people?
Click to expand...

this zigzag whatever post ignores my argument, so i'm not going to waste time on it. i'd say that i probably won't waste time on the response to this post, either, but the "probably" would be unnecessary. peace.
 
Helix said:
this zigzag whatever post ignores my argument, so i'm not going to waste time on it. i'd say that i probably won't waste time on the response to this post, either, but the "probably" would be unnecessary. peace.
Click to expand...

Don't loose my time. Just leave. Peace.
 
Helix said:
this zigzag whatever post ignores my argument, so i'm not going to waste time on it. i'd say that i probably won't waste time on the response to this post, either, but the "probably" would be unnecessary. peace.
Click to expand...

Yeah, some people don't seem very interested in discussion.
 
AmIsraelHai said:
As I said I have no problem with the LGBT community, as long the don't change the society.
Click to expand...

Society is changing all the time. Why should it matter if it is gays contributing to that change or not?
 
AmIsraelHai said:
You can't change mother nature.
Click to expand...

Who is trying to do that? And, can you elaborate on what you mean. Can you do it in a clear and rational manner
 
RAMOSS said:
THat is a response that is an evasion. Can't you use a valid source to back up your claim?
Click to expand...

I already did, look on the first page. Tones of references
 
AmIsraelHai said:
I already did, look on the first page. Tones of references
Click to expand...

Well, as The Governess pointed out, many of those sources refute your claim, and the ones that don't are associated with Catholic institutions, not an unbiased source.

Do you have an unbiased source that backs up your claim, rather than refute it???
 
RAMOSS said:
Well, as The Governess pointed out, many of those sources refute your claim, and the ones that don't are associated with Catholic institutions, not an unbiased source.

Do you have an unbiased source that backs up your claim, rather than refute it???
Click to expand...

Your avatar is scary...
 
AmIsraelHai said:
Your avatar is scary...
Click to expand...

Perhaps,.. but more importantly, can you get an unbiased source that does not actually make the exact opposite point you are trying to make? Can you get one, and extract the section that you think is relevant?
 
RAMOSS said:
Perhaps,.. but more importantly, can you get an unbiased source that does not actually make the exact opposite point you are trying to make? Can you get one, and extract the section that you think is relevant?
Click to expand...

You are too smart for that....
 
AmIsraelHai said:
You are too smart for that....
Click to expand...

You are not showing you actually read any of the sources you gave, or understood what they said. Why is that? Can you give a source and extract the points to show you actually read and understood it? Can you show one that is not involved with a religious institution that backs up your claim?? Your previous lists were either associated with a religious institution, or disagreed with you. Why is that? Why are you deflecting from that point?
 
RAMOSS said:
You are not showing you actually read any of the sources you gave, or understood what they said. Why is that? Can you give a source and extract the points to show you actually read and understood it? Can you show one that is not involved with a religious institution that backs up your claim?? Your previous lists were either associated with a religious institution, or disagreed with you. Why is that? Why are you deflecting from that point?
Click to expand...

I told once look the 1st page
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom