Lev Parnas is now Trump's worst nightmare

[Chomsky]

Though that would make Senate Republicans look [even more] terrible [than usual].

As my brackets suggest, I'm not sure how much perception counts for anymore.

I do believe the GOP over-ruling Roberts displaying partisanship would move the needle a bit, just as impeachment moved the needle significantly. Little bits matter in elections of the type we're facing.

 

[veritas1]

Yawn. Not interested in your penchant for irrelevancies, thanks.

It's totally relevant. It's why they are now whining for the Senate to call witnesses, something they are in no way obligated to do. The House Dems f'ed up. Too bad.

 

[DiAnna]

Did you just copy someone else's post here or the original twitter post and not give credit?? Hmmmmmmmm......plagiarizing is not good.

Yesterday:

Oh, well played! :lol:

 

[Tanngrisnir]

The WB instigated the whole affair. Of course he's a material witness. Schiff's office met the WB three weeks before the complaint was filed. Schiff. of course, lied about that. He's a material witness, too. We should all hear about what coordination went on while the Dems were cooking up this latest fraud.

LOL! Newp. No matter how much your whine and sputter, Schiff is in no way a material witness to twump's crimes and you have no evidence, whatsoever, that he lied.

You should have someone explain to you what 'material witness' means.

Fun!

 

[Tanngrisnir]

It's totally relevant. It's why they are now whining for the Senate to call witnesses, something they are in no way obligated to do. The House Dems f'ed up. Too bad.

No, they've been demanding that the Senate allow witnesses since the impeachment took place.

Yet again you demonstrate that you have absolutely no idea what you're babblign about.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

uh oh---the school marm's are out!!!

View attachment 67271895

LAFFRIOT!!

Plagiarism isn't a good cover for your rank dishonesty.

 

[jnug]

So Parnas really adds nothing but second hand info in this impeachment. As I said earlier, the key witness is Rudy. Without his testimony and without him fingering Trump, you will never get a vote to remove.

I don't want Parnas to testify. Nobody wanted Parnas to testify because he is engaged in an ongoing prosecution and you really can't offer him Congressional Immunity under those circumstances. I must have posted this at least twice already. Lev will STILL be in an ongoing prosecution long after the Impeachment trial is over. Lev is pushing to testify apparently under any circumstances now including no Congressional Immunity and people who have not thought this through are pushing for him to testify all aglow over the Maddow interviews.

The House wanted his documents and his phone data and phone records and they finally got them yesterday. They are revealing and compelling.

All this yammering for Lev to testify is based on his Maddow interview. I STILL don't want him to testify. The House has what it wanted. Thats enough! I don't give a crap what people want based on the Maddow interviews. If people had any idea what they were talking about, they would realize the ridiculousness of this effort to get Lev in front of the Senate.

If there are going to be witnesses, it will be a limited number and Lev simply does not make the cut.

 

[DiAnna]

Keep telling yourself that. To me, it sounds like more of the status quo.

Yeah, in the Kremlin.

 

[veritas1]

LOL! Newp. No matter how much your whine and sputter, Schiff is in no way a material witness to twump's crimes and you have no evidence, whatsoever, that he lied.

You should have someone explain to you what 'material witness' means.

Fun!

That you believe Schiff pretty much says it all.

 

[Tangmo]

Parnas is the Democrat's new Avenatti. Very likely he will end up in the same place Avenatti is headed. I wonder if CNN will hire Parnas?

Putin already hired Trump.

 

[ultmd]

I don't want Parnas to testify. Nobody wanted Parnas to testify because he is engaged in an ongoing prosecution and you really can't offer him Congressional Immunity under those circumstances. I must have posted this at least twice already.

Not necessarily true. As a cooperating witness (with prosecutors in the SDNY), he absolutely could be allowed to testify as a witness. Just depends on the agreement he has with them. And clearly, he's only repeating what he's already told the federal prosecutors at SDNY. That's why he gave the interview to Maddow.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

That you believe Schiff pretty much says it all.

That you can't back up your asinine claim about him and have to resort to your fantasies, and that you don't understand something as simple as the fact that Schiff and Biden were not witness to twump's crimes, and therefore not material witnesses, pretty much says it all.

You're in way over your head.

 

[veritas1]

No, they've been demanding that the Senate allow witnesses since the impeachment took place.

Yet again you demonstrate that you have absolutely no idea what you're babblign about.

The Senate has NO obligation to call witnesses. The fact finding phase is done in the House. The Dems can whine all they want but they can't change the Constitution. BTW, the Dems have been demanding impeachment since November 2016. No partisanship there I tell ya! Utterly hilarious. The best part is going to be watching them get turned into roadkill in 10 months. So, get ready to cry your eyes out!:lamo

 

[veritas1]

That you can't back up your asinine claim about him and have to resort to your fantasies, and that you don't understand something as simple as the fact that Schiff and Biden were not witness to twump's crimes, and therefore not material witnesses, pretty much says it all.

You're in way over your head.

Schiff had contact with the WB. That makes him a fact witness. Just because you believe his lies doesn't change it.

 

[US&THEM]

Yet, the Dems claim that Trump obstructed Congress by asking the opinion of the courts, something he is 100% entitled to do. Turley made this point quite clearly in his testimony.

Yawn, Nixon was charged for obstruction when he used the same tactics. Congress has the “SOLE” power to impeach, it is in the Constitution.

Trump does what he has always done, get caught, deny and then sue. Stay classy.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

The Senate has NO obligation to call witnesses.

Irrelevant. I never addressed that.

The fact finding phase is done in the House.

Ah, yes, more constitutional illiteracy on your part. The Senate can engage in fact finding.

The Dems can whine all they want but they can't change the Constitution.

More fantasy blathering. They haven't demanded the Constitution be changed.

BTW, the Dems have been demanding impeachment since November 2016.

Some, perhaps, and utterly irrelevant to the crimes twump committed.

No partisanship there I tell ya! Utterly hilarious. The best part is going to be watching them get turned into roadkill in 10 months. So, get ready to cry your eyes out!:lamo

Always a pleasure exposing your ignorance and dishonesty.

 

[veritas1]

Putin already hired Trump.

Yea, remember when Trump showed up with that red plastic reset button?:lol:

 

[Chomsky]

Did you just copy someone else's post here or the original twitter post and not give credit?? Hmmmmmmmm......plagiarizing is not good.

Yesterday:

You're mod material! :thumbs:

 

[Tanngrisnir]

Schiff had contact with the WB. That makes him a fact witness. Just because you believe his lies doesn't change it.

No, he didn't. And if he had, it still wouldn't make him a material witness. Fun to watch you bray about things you cannot substantiate.

Your dishonesty is really tripping you up here.

 

[US&THEM]

Schiff had contact with the WB. That makes him a fact witness. Just because you believe his lies doesn't change it.

And you know this fact how?

 

[Tangmo]

The Senate has NO obligation to call witnesses. The fact finding phase is done in the House. The Dems can whine all they want but they can't change the Constitution. BTW, the Dems have been demanding impeachment since November 2016. No partisanship there I tell ya! Utterly hilarious. The best part is going to be watching them get turned into roadkill in 10 months. So, get ready to cry your eyes out!:lamo

You might want to say something we don't already know.

Your predictions and forecasts continue to be the same as the laffable hurricane forecast Trump made while also making an asshat of himself as per.

 

[jnug]

Not necessarily true. As a cooperating witness (with prosecutors in the SDNY), he absolutely could be allowed to testify as a witness. Just depends on the agreement he has with them. And clearly, he's only repeating what he's already told the federal prosecutors at SDNY. That's why he gave the interview to Maddow.

He apparently does not have a cooperation agreement with SDNY and I doubt he is going to get one. If he had one, SDNY would be going banana's right now. I have not seen any bananas from SDNY.

 

[veritas1]

Irrelevant. I never addressed that.

Ah, yes, more constitutional illiteracy on your part. The Senate can engage in fact finding.

More fantasy blathering. They haven't demanded the Constitution be changed.

Some, perhaps, and utterly irrelevant to the crimes twump committed.

Always a pleasure exposing your ignorance and dishonesty.

The Constitution is clear. The House Dems utterly failed and are now whining about their failures while casting about trying to blame Republicans. They get everything they deserve. And more is to come.

 

[veritas1]

You might want to say something we don't already know.

Your predictions and forecasts continue to be the same s the laffable hurricane forecast Trump made while also making an asshat of himself as per.

The Dems have been acting as if McConnell has some obligation to call witnesses. McConnell shouldn't call anybody. Vote it down and get back to work. Oh, wait, the Dems have never started working. Nevermind.

 

[Tangmo]

The Constitution is clear. The House Dems utterly failed and are now whining about their failures while casting about trying to blame Republicans. They get everything they deserve. And more is to come.

Your reading of the Russian constitution does not apply in the USA.