I have no idea why you come off saying this bs instead of discussing the facts. Is it some type of defense mechanism to protect a mind from something that may hurt its feelings?
There are countless well educated, very experienced people who are experts in their field saying things about 9/11. Here is one out of many, many of them.
Joel S. Hirschhorn, BS Metallurgical Engineering, MS Metallurgical Engineering, PhD Materials Engineering – Professor of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Senior Staff Member, Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Testified more than 50 times before Congress on technology and science issues. National Governors Association. Consultant to industrial and chemical companies, DOE laboratories, state governments, and public interest organizations.
Quote: "Many technical analyses cast doubt on the official explanation of the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings. More difficult than discovering the truth, however, is convincing most of the public to accept the bitter truth."
"When it comes to 9/11, we face the strong belief that only al-Qaeda caused 9/11. But analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers."
"The immediate reaction is like a cosmic big bang. It would have taken considerable effort by a number of people with expertise and access to the buildings to rig them so that they could be intentionally collapsed when the two jets hit the towers. Tough questions flood in: Who could have engineered all this? Could foreign agents accomplish such complex actions - and if they did, why not take credit for it? If Americans did it, why would they intentionally inflict inevitable mass death and devastation? Worse, they seemingly knew about the plan to fly the jets into the towers."
"Groups of Architects and Engineers want a new, honest and comprehensive study that considers all the evidence for controlled demolition. As a former engineering professor with growing skepticism about the official WTC story I share their concerns. First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions. But let us not allow a possible painful truth block the primary task of determining once and for all what caused the collapse of the WTC towers and building no. 7."
"If those that believe the official 9/11 story - especially elected officials - trust their views, then let them support a serious effort to test the validity of the controlled demolition hypothesis. If they fear and reject doing so, then let us see that as suspicious and unacceptable."
"Horrific possible answers can cause us to shun a question. But clearing our minds of the fear of painful truths is essential to clearing our nation of destructive lies. Otherwise, we stay stuck in a delusional democracy."