- Joined
- Jul 13, 2016
- Messages
- 6,765
- Reaction score
- 955
- Location
- Land of Logic
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
The definition is clear and definitive.......not vague or obtuse in any way.
:2usflag:
:2usflag:
Regardless, if you want to own them, fine, but not around children.The definition is clear and definitive.......not vague or obtuse in any way.
:2usflag:
Regardless, if you want to own them, fine, but not around children.
Legal Definition of PIT BULL
:2usflag:
Again.......
The dogs you pictured looked nothing like pit bulls.
This is a pit bull. The difference is clear.
View attachment 67217253
This is not a difficult thing.........except for the pit bull apologists who want to pretend you can't identify a pit bull--to protect their bastard killer dogs.
:2usflag:
Attacking Pit Bull Dies
Wish we would see more stories like this.
We need more concealed carry.
Police: Waco skateboarder justified in shooting, killing pit bull
:2usflag:
Police seized five dogs and six puppies from the home of the man who was arrested.
Neighbours said the dogs were kept in cages at the back of the house.
Chief Inspector Dave Westby said: 'This was a horrific attack which has resulted in a two-year-old girl suffering extensive injuries to her head and body.
As I said above, the photos he posted don't look anything like pit bulls. I posted a picture of a pit bull.
It looks nothing like his photos.
:2usflag:
The courts have ruled that a person of ordinary intelligence can identify a pit bull......no test needed.
The courts have given us a clear legal definition of a pit bull.
What more do you need? This is not difficult.
:2usflag:
here you are with an American bulldog, which is not a pit bull...
Pit Bull Law and Legal Definition
A "pit bull," is defined as any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds. Dias v. City & County of Denver, 567 F.3d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir. Colo. 2009)
yet, you can't tell an American Bulldog from any of the bull and terrier breeds.
You posted a picture of an American Bulldog, which is not a pit bull, the boston terrier is more of a pitbull than an American bulldog.
Pit Bull Law and Legal Definition
A "pit bull," is defined as any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds. Dias v. City & County of Denver, 567 F.3d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir. Colo. 2009)
More Today's Mayhem.....
American Pit Bulls in England
England has banned several specific types of pit bulls but has not banned all pit bull mongrel breeds.
Dogs pictured in Toxteth garden next to mauling site | Daily Mail Online
:2usflag:
Except......you're wrong.
It IS a pit bull according to the legal definition of a pit bull.
See how that works? It's not all that difficult.
:2usflag:
Impossible
You claimed they have bullet proof heads and need at least 16 bullets to kill.
yeah, not a pit bull, it's none of those 3 breeds listed, and does not conform to the AKC or UKC standards. it's very simple. and yet you missed it.
Pit Bull Law and Legal Definition
A "pit bull," is defined as any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds. Dias v. City & County of Denver, 567 F.3d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir. Colo. 2009)
Except..... you're wrong.
I can and you can't.
:2usflag:
10 dogs in a small apartment, yard, previously out of control, unneutered males, and mastiff mixes.... the issue is not the breed here, once again, it's the owner who had an uncontrolled pack of unneutered dogs in a small confined area
but clearly you can't. That American bulldog is not a pitbull.
Pit Bull Law and Legal Definition
A "pit bull," is defined as any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds. Dias v. City & County of Denver, 567 F.3d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir. Colo. 2009)
Except.....you're wrong.
It has the required "physical traits" named in the legal definition of a pit bull.
See how that works?
:2usflag:
No, the ISSUE is that England has currently only banned a few specific pit bull breeds and not issued a blanket ban on all mongrel pit bull cross breeds.
That failure cost a little girl her face.
England will get it right......it just takes time.
:2usflag:
Except........you're wrong again.
Actually, it is.......and the legal definition of pit bull proves it.
Are you starting to understand it?
:2usflag:
I have no idea how your mind works.
Completely different breeds. you fail
Pit Bull Law and Legal Definition
A "pit bull," is defined as any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds. Dias v. City & County of Denver, 567 F.3d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir. Colo. 2009)
Only.........those are YOUR words.
And your words are not saying the same thing MY words said.
See how that works?
:2usflag: