- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Because, like you, they are wrong.
Organizations often take political stances for political reasons.......often, as in your case, wrong stances and often disagreeing with their own members.
Here's a link to a list of trained professionals and academics who want strong and immediate action against pit bulls.
A clip of just a few examples:
Safety Before Pit Bulldogs: Animal Science Experts on Pit Bulls
:2usflag:
The United States Department of Education has designated the AVMA as the accrediting body for the 30[4] schools of veterinary medicine in the United States. In this capacity, the AVMA develops and maintains educational standards for these institutions to ensure the qualifications and competency of graduates of veterinary schools.[5]
Interesting.
You know there are "credible scientists" who deny climate change too right? If you have an agenda you have an agenda. What I don't see...is any link to studies. Just links to people with opinions. Not studies. People who are...again...NOT BACKED by the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of their peers.
So. In your opinion...the vast majority of professionals who are responsible for accrediting the 30 vet schools in the United States as well as associated with 89,000 vets and of course...provide the major basis of scholarly research on animal medicine...is wrong?
Lol. Nice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk