I heard someone calling for help one day right after I had gotten married and went suburbia. I grabbed a bat and ran out the door, it was a neighbor. Two pitbulls were latched onto his dog. Some girl was arriving there to, and she told me not to hurt the dogs. I ignored her and asked the guy, whose property we were on, what he wanted to do. He said he'd prefer to just restrain the dogs. They were like robots, they completely ignored us, they were filled with bitemark holes from his dog. We had to pry their mouths off (flashlight and bat), and then pin the dogs, they just looked at his dog the entire time, eerie stuff. That took considerable time and effort even though they were fairly small sized and exhausted. AC finally showed up and took them.
I don't hate pitbulls, but I don't think they are a responsible breed to own, breed, etc. I think the argument of "so when does banning start/stop" is just slipper slope fallacy. Ultimately choices our ours to make as a society. It doesn't mean put them down, it just means phase them out naturally (no new owners, no new breeders, etc.) Everything is grey and has pros/cons, pit bulls are just too far in the "unnecessarily dangerous' category IMO. Given all the other breeds one can own, it's just not a public issue of freedom to need to own a specific breed IMO.
I do like seeing pro gun control liberals use the same arguments pro-gun folks use, and vice-versa, on this issue though. It's really surreal to see that in this thread.