Once again, those are some very selective fact...the facts you want to address.Wait, it is a fact the boyfriend fired first and struck the Louisville officer.
it was a lawful search warrant, Taylor was still kn contact with her ex-boyfriend and had taken drugs and money into the apt.
Those are the facts.
They indicted one officer of wanton endangerment and the two officers were not indicted for anything in the killing of Breonna Taylor . The wanton endangerment was for shooting into the apartment from outside. None were indicted for the killing Bronne Taylor. The officer charged with wanton endangerment could get as little as one year in jail. I suspect this is not what the community was expecting/hoping for and that there will be protests which could lead to more riots. I have written this before, stop killing unarmed black people and you will stop having riots.Kentucky grand jury indicts 1 of 3 police officers in fatal Breonna Taylor shooting – but not for her death
A former Louisville detective was indicted on felony charges after shooting into an apartment next door to Breonna Taylor.www.usatoday.com
Not even a reckless homicide charge?
Come on. That's beyond absurd.
Once again, those are some very selective fact...the facts you want to address.
NONE of the above justifies firing 20+ shots randomly into the apartment, btw.
And this announcement today did not address the legality (or lack thereof) of the search warrant. In fact, that's being investigated by the feds, as part of their investigation.
Also there were no drugs found in the apartment, or on Taylor or her boyfriend. And the records indicate that she was NOT "still in contact" with Glover, and had not been for quite some time. Even Glover, himself, who was already in custody when raid on Taylor's apartment was executed, said that.
They had a no knock warrant, which IMO are not a good idea. There are conflicting stories about announcing but they did not need to do.A terrible miscarriage of justice. The wanton endangerment charge is a gross overcharge based on the available facts. The subject they were seeking to arrest had a warrant for dealing drugs; the house they came to was indicated as being part of the drug operation; the officers knocked and announced themselves before entering; upon entering they encountered gunfire directed at them and returned fire in self defense. Breyona Taylor was killed in the ensuing exchange of gunfire. She made choices in her life to associate with known felons---and indications are she may have been complicit in the criminal operations as well.
Play stupid games win stupid prizes. Blame Darwin.
Oh, so the police who LIED on their initial police report are now honest and should be trusted?oh so the main target is now honest and his information should be trusted? The warrant was legal and the Sgt was struck first, I agree the officer who was fired for his actions should be charged and was.
When you knock on a persons door it is now ok for the resident to fire a shot at the door? If they lied on the search warrant then they deserve to be charged. The warrant was legal it was signed.Oh, so the police who LIED on their initial police report are now honest and should be trusted?
Why would the main target lie about something like that? And cell phone records are rather easy to obtain, you know? There is ZERO evidence that Taylor was "still in contact" with her ex. You just made that up, and you know it. There's a very good reason why the LMPD isn't promoting the argument you are defending.
We do not know if the warrant was legal, or not. That issue was NOT addressed by the Ky AG today. So stop with that lie, ok?
This, too, is all b.s. You're just throwing poo at the wall, hoping that some of it sticks (or, at least, goes unchallenged so you can declare it a "fact" later), right?They had a no knock warrant, which IMO are not a good idea. There are conflicting stories about announcing but they did not need to do.
The boyfriend should have been charged, but they dropped the charges later. He randomly shot in the direction he heard noises.
Why must you keep making up lies and resorting to Strawman logic in order to justify yours arguments?When you knock on a persons door it is now ok for the resident to fire a shot at the door? If they lied on the search warrant then they deserve to be charged. The warrant was legal it was signed.
They had a no knock warrant, which IMO are not a good idea. There are conflicting stories about announcing but they did not need to do.
The boyfriend should have been charged, but they dropped the charges later. He randomly shot in the direction he heard noises.
They asked and received a LEGAL NO KNOCK warrant, I don’t agree with the use of such a warrant but nonetheless they legally had it.This, too, is all b.s. You're just throwing poo at the wall, hoping that some of it sticks (or, at least, goes unchallenged so you can declare it a "fact" later), right?
Ask ANY trained police officer about a "knock and announce" in multi-family residence scenario, and you'll be told that it is the officers obligation to identify themselves so loudly that EVERYONE in the vicinity hears them. That clearly didn't happen. Again, of 12 witnesses identified from adjacent apartments, and above/below apartments....only ONE person claims to have heard anything. And that guy was a truck driver who had just got home and was awake watching tv in the apartment directly above Taylor's.
There was ZERO reason to charge the boyfriend. He fired ONE shot, and it was NOT "random". It was directly at the first person that busted through his door. He hit the cop in his thigh, before the 3 cops opened fired and RANDOMLY fired 20+ shots in 3 directions...killing Breonna. Breonna's boyfriend (who that actually laid eyes on) wasn't even wounded. And he was entirely within his rights to fire upon anyone intruding into the apartment. Even the LMPD acknowledges that.
You keep bringing up the suspect. There were more than one person arrested the main target ran a drug business out of multiple properties. Drug dealers are able to utilize multiple residences for their illegal activities, therefore him being in custody has zero to do with your lame argument.Why must you keep making up lies and resorting to Strawman logic in order to justify yours arguments?
Taylor's boyfriend didn't fire a shot until the door flew off and the first man busted into the apartment.
And a signed warrant is NOT necessarily a legal warrant. Also, they already had the suspect in custody at the time they busted into Taylor's apartment. They raided and arrested the suspect 40 minutes before the raid on Taylor's apt.
Geez, man...enough with the dumb stuff, already.
Majority of narcotics officers do not wear cameras. They have changed that in Louisville from what i have read.Where the hell are the body cam videos? THAT absence deserves punishment.
They asked and received a LEGAL NO KNOCK warrant, I don’t agree with the use of such a warrant but nonetheless they legally had it.
you have continuously made up stuff and you question my posts? Get real.
First, it's not "community" but the rioting and looting thugs.They indicted one officer of wanton endangerment and the two officers were not indicted for anything in the killing of Breonna Taylor . The wanton endangerment was for shooting into the apartment from outside. None were indicted for the killing Bronne Taylor. The officer charged with wanton endangerment could get as little as one year in jail. I suspect this is not what the community was expecting/hoping for and that there will be protests which could lead to more riots. I have written this before, stop killing unarmed black people and you will stop having riots.
They had a no knock warrant, which IMO are not a good idea.
There are conflicting stories about announcing but they did not need to do.
The boyfriend should have been charged, but they dropped the charges later. He randomly shot in the direction he heard noises.
More made up b.s.You keep bringing up the suspect. There were more than one person arrested the main target ran a drug business out of multiple properties. Drug dealers are able to utilize multiple residences for their illegal activities, therefore him being in custody has zero to do with your lame argument.
Not even a reckless homicide charge?
Come on. That's beyond absurd.
Once again, those are some very selective fact...the facts you want to address.
The Castle Doctrine applies to black people, too, you know? Anyone is entitled to defend their home with lethal force. And Breonna's boyfriend stated that they heard nothing but loud knocking when the door was busted-in. He returned fire, as was his right. But, regardless.....NONE of the above justifies firing 20+ shots randomly into the apartment, btw.
And this announcement today did not address the legality (or lack thereof) of the search warrant. In fact, that's being investigated by the feds, as part of their investigation.
Also there were no drugs found in the apartment, or on Taylor or her boyfriend. And the records indicate that she was NOT "still in contact" with Glover, and had not been for quite some time. Even Glover, himself, who was already in custody when raid on Taylor's apartment was executed, said that.
Ask ANY trained police officer about a "knock and announce" in multi-family residence scenario, and you'll be told that it is the officers obligation to identify themselves so loudly that EVERYONE in the vicinity hears them.
That clearly didn't happen. Again, of 12 witnesses identified from adjacent apartments, and above/below apartments....only ONE person claims to have heard anything. And that guy was a truck driver who had just got home and was awake watching tv in the apartment directly above Taylor's.
There was ZERO reason to charge the boyfriend.
He fired ONE shot, and it was NOT "random". It was directly at the first person that busted through his door. He hit the cop in his thigh, before the 3 cops opened fired and RANDOMLY fired 20+ shots in 3 directions...killing Breonna. Breonna's boyfriend (who that actually laid eyes on) wasn't even wounded. And he was entirely within his rights to fire upon anyone intruding into the apartment. Even the LMPD acknowledges that.
That's because Taylor's ol' man was firing at the cops, while Taylor was sitting next to him. There was no no-knock warrant and cops knocked on the door, right before Kenneth Walker opened fire.
I guess you believe anything a republican Trump loving, McConnell loving AG tells you. This whole thing was a set up to protect the cops from the get go. No body cams when one of the citizen videos shows a body cam. Lies on the original report that said she was not injured. One witness said he heard them announce, but many others said they didn't.
I wouldn't be surprised if those people burn down the courthouse and the police HQ. The city of Louisville in in for a world of sh**.
It sounds like you're giving some good advice to Donald Trump.Good rule of thumb, don't associate with criminals, pick better friends and partners. No skin color is immune to poor life choices.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?