• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Leslie Stahl on Trump's media attack.

Shiftman

Banned
Joined
May 10, 2018
Messages
130
Reaction score
59
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate
When Leslie asked Trump why the constant attacks on the media continued after he won the Republican nomination, Trump told her that by placing doubt about the media, his supporters wouldn't believe anythinq bad that the media might report about him.
SIMPLE manipulation tactic by a "wannabe" dictator/ autocrat.= The exploitation of the essentially dumb and extremely gullible Trump supporters.
 
When Leslie asked Trump why the constant attacks on the media continued after he won the Republican nomination, Trump told her that by placing doubt about the media, his supporters wouldn't believe anythinq bad that the media might report about him.
SIMPLE manipulation tactic by a "wannabe" dictator/ autocrat.= The exploitation of the essentially dumb and extremely gullible Trump supporters.

Not that I don't believe you, because Trump is a vile, dishonorable manipulator of the easily manipulated, but do you have a link?
 

He said, 'You know why I do it? I do it to discredit you all and demean you all so when you write negative stories about me, no one will believe you.' He said that," Stahl told the audience, adding, "So, put that in your head for a minute."

WTF? The man is so out of control he doesn't even attempt to lie about it.

Cue his supporters telling us how absolutely awesome he is to do this, and, well.....HILLARY!
 
He said, 'You know why I do it? I do it to discredit you all and demean you all so when you write negative stories about me, no one will believe you.' He said that," Stahl told the audience, adding, "So, put that in your head for a minute."

WTF? The man is so out of control he doesn't even attempt to lie about it.

Cue his supporters telling us how absolutely awesome he is to do this, and, well.....HILLARY!

And his supporters won't give a crap as long as he keeps being "not Hillary".
 
It's a smart tactic on Trump's part.

We know the multi-media is obsessed with only reporting negative stories. He's just giving back what they are giving him.

Of course, the snowflake multi-media cry like little bitches when Trump slaps them around. That's to be expected.
 
It's a smart tactic on Trump's part.

We know the multi-media is obsessed with only reporting negative stories. He's just giving back what they are giving him.

Of course, the snowflake multi-media cry like little bitches when Trump slaps them around. That's to be expected.

wow...even with him saying he's pulling the wool over your eyes for his own purposes you still defend him.

You guys are sheep looking for a shepherd and obviously you guys have 0 standards.
 
It's a smart tactic on Trump's part.

We know the multi-media is obsessed with only reporting negative stories. He's just giving back what they are giving him.

Of course, the snowflake multi-media cry like little bitches when Trump slaps them around. That's to be expected.
Also...it's not "smart"...it's dishonest. It's reckless. It's not like his idea of any of his methods are novel or even advanced.
 
He said, 'You know why I do it? I do it to discredit you all and demean you all so when you write negative stories about me, no one will believe you.' He said that," Stahl told the audience, adding, "So, put that in your head for a minute."

WTF? The man is so out of control he doesn't even attempt to lie about it.

Cue his supporters telling us how absolutely awesome he is to do this, and, well.....HILLARY!

If he said that, then yes, I agree with you completely. However, it's a "He Said, She Said" at this point, and I don't easily believe either of them. Can I believe that he would say such a thing... Oh yeah, no doubt about it. But until I hear it on a recording or video, I tend to also believe at this point that Stahl could be adding to the quote either knowingly or subconsciously - it isn't hard for our brains to remember what we assume a person meant and add flourishes to quotes from that long ago. I know she's a professional reporter, but she also has a well documented pro-Democrat anti-Republican sway to her reporting, not to say for sure that is true here.

My only point is, I try not to let my confirmation bias allow me to instantly believe things from either the press or politicians just because I can easily see how whatever they may be saying could be true and fit my preconceived view of the target of what they're saying.

That said, Again, I have no problem believing that Trump would do such a thing. The actual funny part is, all politicians manipulate like this, and Trump is so freaking arrogant that he has no problem admitting it because he truly believes that even if he admits what he's doing (like what he said about shooting a person in the street) that his supporters will continue to support him, regardless. That's the funny part. The sad and scary part is he's probably right about his supporters.
 
When Leslie asked Trump why the constant attacks on the media continued after he won the Republican nomination, Trump told her that by placing doubt about the media, his supporters wouldn't believe anythinq bad that the media might report about him.
SIMPLE manipulation tactic by a "wannabe" dictator/ autocrat.= The exploitation of the essentially dumb and extremely gullible Trump supporters.

Did anyone ever think his motive differed from that? That attestation is one few truthful things Trump's said in recent years.

Speaking of Trump's having sat down to give a formal interview, not only is he vying to avoid being interviewed by Mueller/the grand jury, he's also not done a formal press conference in some 400+ days, the longest of any POTUS in the past half century. Aside from brief Q&As with other heads of state wherein he routinely refuses to answer tough questions posed to him, all Trump does is have one-way communication: he tweets or calls Fox & Friends/Hannity and rants, but he steers well clear of Fox's "hard news" professional journalists like Chris Wallace and Bret Baier.
 
It's a smart tactic on Trump's part.

We know the multi-media is obsessed with only reporting negative stories. He's just giving back what they are giving him.

Of course, the snowflake multi-media cry like little bitches when Trump slaps them around. That's to be expected.

So with the NOKO deal in shambles, when was the last time Swampy ever did anything good?
 
Also...it's not "smart"...it's dishonest. It's reckless. It's not like his idea of any of his methods are novel or even advanced.

Since Trump just gives them what he gets from them, you aren't saying anything good about the media, are you?
 
So with the NOKO deal in shambles, when was the last time Swampy ever did anything good?

???

What on earth does NK have to do with this?

Oh...wait...never mind. Just another deflection.

Moving on...
 
wow...even with him saying he's pulling the wool over your eyes for his own purposes you still defend him.

You guys are sheep looking for a shepherd and obviously you guys have 0 standards.

I don't need his tactics to show me how screwed up the media is, but low-info people do.

Of course, it works the other way, as well. There are plenty of anti-Trumpers who don't care about the nonsense from the media, but their useful idiots are influenced...so it's all a good thing.
 
From the video at the linked article:

  • He really is the same off camera that he is on camera, exactly the same.
    That observation isn't surprising for others have said as much. All the same, that his private bearing matches his public one is actually among the more disconcerting things about him. Some may say that they like that because it shows he's genuine, authentic, etc. Well, yes, and I can appreciate that, but his authenticity doesn't negate the reality that his being consistently a vulgar rube necessarily means too that there really is "nobody home," that there's no "there" there.

    Appreciating Trump's authenticity is like appreciating that a cobra has reared up and presented itself. Yes, one knows that the serpent is indeed deadly, but that awareness doesn't obviate the fact that beast is deadly. Trump had the temerity to refer to other folks as animals, but a snake in the grass is precisely the kind of animal Trump is.

    32356255021_6f9b2df332_b.jpg


    King+Cobra+Life-Size+Snake+Statue.jpg
 
???

What on earth does NK have to do with this?

Oh...wait...never mind. Just another deflection.

Moving on...

I asked you a direct question. Name the last time Swampy did something good. You claimed that the media's coverage shouldn't be all negative....So what should they cover?
 
wow...even with him saying he's pulling the wool over your eyes for his own purposes you still defend him.

You guys are sheep looking for a shepherd and obviously you guys have 0 standards.

the tRump lemmings seek someone to tell them what to think. that explains the widespread evangelistic following
 
Also...it's not "smart"...it's dishonest. It's reckless. It's not like his idea of any of his methods are novel or even advanced.

he's simple and so are they
 
I asked you a direct question. Name the last time Swampy did something good. You claimed that the media's coverage shouldn't be all negative....So what should they cover?

Heck, I'll tell you the first time Trump did something good: The day he was inaugurated he tossed an Obama EO in the trash.
 
Heck, I'll tell you the first time Trump did something good: The day he was inaugurated he tossed an Obama EO in the trash.

That was over a year ago. Got any actual accomplishment that don't include Russian help?
 
If he said that, then yes, I agree with you completely. However, it's a "He Said, She Said" at this point, and I don't easily believe either of them. Can I believe that he would say such a thing... Oh yeah, no doubt about it. But until I hear it on a recording or video, I tend to also believe at this point that Stahl could be adding to the quote either knowingly or subconsciously - it isn't hard for our brains to remember what we assume a person meant and add flourishes to quotes from that long ago. I know she's a professional reporter, but she also has a well documented pro-Democrat anti-Republican sway to her reporting, not to say for sure that is true here.

My only point is, I try not to let my confirmation bias allow me to instantly believe things from either the press or politicians just because I can easily see how whatever they may be saying could be true and fit my preconceived view of the target of what they're saying.

That said, Again, I have no problem believing that Trump would do such a thing. The actual funny part is, all politicians manipulate like this, and Trump is so freaking arrogant that he has no problem admitting it because he truly believes that even if he admits what he's doing (like what he said about shooting a person in the street) that his supporters will continue to support him, regardless. That's the funny part. The sad and scary part is he's probably right about his supporters.

True statement, Beau. It's definitely a "he said-she said" at this point.

Lesley Stahl could be a liar, I don't know. I know for sure Trump is a liar, and a manipulator. I don't know the facts either way, but if I had to trend one way or another, I'll trend towards her because I know what he is. I can only guess what she is.
 
Not that I don't believe you, because Trump is a vile, dishonorable manipulator of the easily manipulated, but do you have a link?

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/t...tml?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=fb&guccounter=1
President Donald Trump told the veteran "60 Minutes" journalist Lesley Stahl that he bashes the press to "demean" and "discredit" reporters so that the public will not believe "negative stories" about him, Stahl said.


Proof that Trump knows he is lying, it's all just an act to manipulate his base, who are easy marks.
 
Since Trump just gives them what he gets from them, you aren't saying anything good about the media, are you?

He gets a lot of negative news stories because a lot of negative things are happening. The whole Pruit situation...a public official charging tax payers a lot of money for frivolous things, getting cheap rent from a lobbyist, and barring specific news agencies from a news conference and then not being fired/disciplined for it would be a huge scandal that would see a ton of coverage. It's one of many things happening in the Trump White House.
 
If he said that, then yes, I agree with you completely. However, it's a "He Said, She Said" at this point, and I don't easily believe either of them. Can I believe that he would say such a thing... Oh yeah, no doubt about it. But until I hear it on a recording or video, I tend to also believe at this point that Stahl could be adding to the quote either knowingly or subconsciously - it isn't hard for our brains to remember what we assume a person meant and add flourishes to quotes from that long ago. I know she's a professional reporter, but she also has a well documented pro-Democrat anti-Republican sway to her reporting, not to say for sure that is true here.

My only point is, I try not to let my confirmation bias allow me to instantly believe things from either the press or politicians just because I can easily see how whatever they may be saying could be true and fit my preconceived view of the target of what they're saying.

That said, Again, I have no problem believing that Trump would do such a thing. The actual funny part is, all politicians manipulate like this, and Trump is so freaking arrogant that he has no problem admitting it because he truly believes that even if he admits what he's doing (like what he said about shooting a person in the street) that his supporters will continue to support him, regardless. That's the funny part. The sad and scary part is he's probably right about his supporters.



https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/t...tml?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=fb&guccounter=1


There's a link to a video, though it's not a clip, it's entire interview. Trump uses the fascist dictator's playbook.
 
Last edited:
I don't need his tactics to show me how screwed up the media is, but low-info people do.

Of course, it works the other way, as well. There are plenty of anti-Trumpers who don't care about the nonsense from the media, but their useful idiots are influenced...so it's all a good thing.

You complain about the media but is Trump honest? Can you trust that the things Trump says are true?
 
Back
Top Bottom