Jack Reacher said about the military something like... some join to serve their country... some join because their family does and some join as a legal means to kill a person. We seem to be seeing this last one more and more regarding the police with the video technology that is everywhere now. What are your thoughts?
Jack Reacher isn't nearly as good as some people seem to think.
Jack Reacher said about the military something like... some join to serve their country... some join because their family does and some join as a legal means to kill a person. We seem to be seeing this last one more and more regarding the police with the video technology that is everywhere now. What are your thoughts?
Hmmm... :think:
No.
The actions of a small fraction of police officers is not reflective of the vast majority who do their jobs as best they are able.
We ignore the vast majority who do their jobs, because we see the sensationalized actions of a few and project their faults onto the whole. :twocents:
Two fictions in one post, neither of great import.
Not nearly the best make-believe out there. I like John MacLean- none of these navel-gazing attempts to explore and rationalize and justify, just, "Yippee kiyay, motherf***er!"
/threadIt's probably easier to get away with random murder as a civilian than to get away with murder under the watchful eye of authority, if one just wants to kill.
Jack Reacher said about the military something like... some join to serve their country... some join because their family does and some join as a legal means to kill a person. We seem to be seeing this last one more and more regarding the police with the video technology that is everywhere now. What are your thoughts?
You don't think any cops become cops as a legal means to kill?
Jack Reacher said about the military something like... some join to serve their country... some join because their family does and some join as a legal means to kill a person. We seem to be seeing this last one more and more regarding the police with the video technology that is everywhere now. What are your thoughts?
Yes. I believe people who choose to make careers in law enforcement do so to benefit society at large. Relatively, few law officers use a gun outside a practice range during their careers. I don't find your paranoia justified.
When people post veiled childish insults for no reason I tend to ignore those posts...
What about the officer that is going to the gun range 3 times a week? Little overboard dontcha think?Yes. I believe people who choose to make careers in law enforcement do so to benefit society at large. Relatively, few law officers use a gun outside a practice range during their careers. I don't find your paranoia justified.
Everything you say about police is based upon your paranoia toward police. That isn't intended as an insult, it is an obvious observation.
What about the officer that is going to the gun range 3 times a week? Little overboard dontcha think?
Not trusting is not paranoia any more than trusting is delusional... and I am not calling you delusional.
A bit of advice... subjective posts with sophomoric reasoning is not a good look.
No. You are unable to objectively review your own words. Your fears are far greater than issues of trust. And your insults in the guise of advice, more desperate.
You don't think any cops become cops as a legal means to kill?
Oh FFS.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2017/
This is a database that tracks police shootings. There are approx 1.6 million law enforcement personnel. A handful of cops ever draw their weapon, let alone have the requirement to pull the trigger. The raw data proves that the vast majority of incidents involve cops and armed citizens resisting arrest.
Not every cop is perfect. Cops are society...and since there are some real ****heads in society it stands to reason that some will find their way onto the force. But the ridiculously vast majority? Come on...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?