• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Left wing logic

dave8383 said:
My definition of a weirdo: Anyone who carries without what I think is a good reason.
Click to expand...
Well 50 state governments consider self defense a good reason.
 
bongsaway said:
They have a good reason, they are afraid. Without their guns they ain't real men.
Click to expand...

And we'll just ignore the women who carry, because the fact that women carry makes that statement look pretty stupid.

Metaphorically, your bowl of argument obviously burned out awhile back.
 
TurtleDude said:
but all current liberal gun control laws do is disarm honest folk.
Click to expand...
No honest folks can still get guns. When dishonest folk get them, we can take them away, or fine them, etc. Think speed limits, stop signs, smog checks, drivers licenses.
 
dave8383 said:
Well, 95% of the population doesn't carry, so explain to me why only 5% feels it's nessary.
Click to expand...
You want me to explain to you subjective needs as determined by millions of individuals?

What would that have to do with your characterization of them as "weirdos" anyway?
 
bongsaway said:
Here's my motivation turtle, guns kill people and in my opinion we have way too many deaths from firearms each and every year. Nothing political about it. It's you second amendment nuts who have bastardized the meaning of the second amendment.
Click to expand...
I see how it is. So it's you "car owners" that cause way to many deaths from speeding and reckless driving, blabbing on your cell phones and texting(supposedly illegal)and drunkenness that have "bastardized" the word privilege. Now tell me about nuclear weapons.
 
RF667799 said:
You want me to explain to you subjective needs as determined by millions of individuals?

What would that have to do with your characterization of them as "weirdos" anyway?
Click to expand...

Well, if 95% of the population thinks like me and doesn't carry, you explain to me why I should think of the tiny percentage that does, not including the exceptions, as anything but weird?
 
dave8383 said:
Nonsense. We all live in America. All these weirdos who think they need to carry just make my country more dangerous.
Click to expand...
LOL. I was going too say move to England or Mexico, but I see your location is Massachusetts so your good.;)
 
zsu2357 said:
LOL. I was going too say move to England or Mexico, but I see your location is Massachusetts so your good.;)
Click to expand...

A little humor huh? I like humor. I got some more for you. I have a concealed carry permit. ;)
 
Nickyjo said:
No honest folks can still get guns. When dishonest folk get them, we can take them away, or fine them, etc. Think speed limits, stop signs, smog checks, drivers licenses.
Click to expand...
There's a major difference between firearms and cars.
 
zsu2357 said:
In other words, no one carries since you would never give the ok for a "good reason" IF it were up to you.
Click to expand...

No, in other words, commonsense rules. Something the right at the moment has far too little of.
 
RF667799 said:
And we'll just ignore the women who carry, because the fact that women carry makes that statement look pretty stupid.

Metaphorically, your bowl of argument obviously burned out awhile back.
Click to expand...
I think "metaphorically" there's some comment he wanted to make about the old "over compensating" thing. Which rates with nukes.
 
dave8383 said:
Well, if 95% of the population thinks like me and doesn't carry, you explain to me why I should think of the tiny percentage that does, not including the exceptions, as anything but weird?
Click to expand...
Your argument amounts to everyone who doesn't agree with you is a weirdo. With all due respect, that's like a grade school level argument.
 
Logical1 said:
Now I know I should be flogged for using the words left wing and logic in the same sentence, but here goes.

An analogy to the real world would be------------a wolf attacks a pen of sheep. So all the sheep are forced to take their teeth out!!!

That is a great analogy to what the left wingers want us to do with their insane gun control laws.
Click to expand...
So you think that a sheep armed only with a pair of sheep teeth could kill single-handedly wipe out an entire pack of wolves?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom