• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lawyers are allowed into Giuliani's NYC apartment after he misses a deadline for turning over assets

Luce

Luce

Weaponized Funk
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
63,519
Reaction score
64,693
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

MSN

www.msn.com

A moving company representative and lawyers were expected to be given access to Rudy Giuliani's Manhattan apartment on Thursday after the former New York City mayor failed to turn over belongings to two former Georgia election workers who won a $148 million defamation judgment against him.

The two sides hurled allegations against each other this week as the deadline for Giuliani to surrender the items passed Tuesday without any of the assets changing hands.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman ordered Giuliani last week to give the election workers, Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, many of his prized possessions. Among them: his $5 million Upper East Side apartment, a 1980 Mercedes once owned by movie star Lauren Bacall, and a variety of other belongings, from his television to a shirt signed by New York Yankees legend Joe DiMaggio to 26 luxury watches.

The moving company representative and lawyers for Freeman and Moss were expected to be let into Giuliani's apartment to see what property was there and estimate the cost of moving items named in Liman's order, according to a court document filed late Wednesday by Aaron Nathan, an attorney for the election workers.

In the document, Nathan said he had talked with Giuliani's lawyers but that they were not ready to turn over any items and could not “even answer basic questions” about the location of the assets.

Giuliani's attorney, Kenneth Caruso, had said in a court filing late Tuesday that his client was ready to hand over the assets but lawyers for Freeman and Moss had not provided instructions on how to do so.

Nathan declined to comment Thursday. The Associated Press left phone and email messages on Thursday with a representative and lawyers for Giuliani.

Voting in West Palm Beach, Florida, on Thursday afternoon, Giuliani did not confirm that anyone had been in his New York apartment. He said he didn't get a chance to defend himself in the Georgia election workers case and said he believes the judgment will be reversed on appeal.

“It will probably be one of the most unfair trials in American history, with the exception of the J6 people," he said, referring to the criminal cases against Trump supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Click to expand...

Rudy woke up on Tuesday and chose public humiliation.
 
Demon said:
I have to wonder what was left in his apartement. Seems to me if he was smart (which of course he is not) he would have cleaned it out.
Click to expand...
I think he is just smart enough to NOT do that. That would move this from a civil trial to a criminal one.
 
Those that get close to Trump and try to ride on his coat tails know what they are doing and get what they deserve. I do feel a little sorry though for the average low IQ maga who have been overcome by the Trump propaganda and find rational thought to difficult.
 
Luce said:
I think he is just smart enough to NOT do that. That would move this from a civil trial to a criminal one.
Click to expand...

I'm assuming there was a list of what was there, but who made the list? Were her attorneys allowed to go in there beforehand? (I really do not know just how these things work)
 
Demon said:
I'm assuming there was a list of what was there, but who made the list? Were her attorneys allowed to go in there beforehand? (I really do not know just how these things work)
Click to expand...
There is in fact an itemized list. 26 luxury watches, some really valuable sports memorabilia, jewelry, furniture, light switches, faucets, light bulbs, etc.
 
Not one single tiny shred of sympathy to a despicable man who would ruin the llives of 2 innocent poll workers. He deserves everything that happens to him.
 
I assume the list was created by an agent of the court. Bailiff or deputy. Larger areas have specialists that do this.

Here, the defendant just goes berserk and burns his house down, then runs for Nogales.
 
Jessie C said:
Not one single tiny shred of sympathy to a despicable man who would ruin the llives of 2 innocent poll workers. He deserves everything that happens to him.
Click to expand...

Agreed, no sympathy for someone who knowingly threw it all away at the alter of Lord Trump, and now his deliberate actions to place two poll workers in danger has come back on him.
 
OrphanSlug said:
Agreed, no sympathy for someone who knowingly threw it all away at the alter of Lord Trump, and now his deliberate actions to place two poll workers in danger has come back on him.
Click to expand...
If I had my way, he'd be up on criminal charges over the poll worker thing.

There's a statute for everything.
 
John Kennedy in his inauguration address in 1961 said

“Those who foolish sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside”

 
Old mother Hubbard.....
 
Mr Person said:
When is MAGA not the victim?
Click to expand...

They are always the victim. Always. That's what fuels MAGA in the first place: their entitlement and any perceived deprivation of it is the offense.
 
Luce said:
They are all architects of their own rewards.
Click to expand...
Donald and crew need to stop whining about self inflicted wounds,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom